This is the theme movie behind Darkbird18 Blog. The Good The Bad and The Ugly is to what life is all about. The definitive "spaghetti western", a real classic masterpiece from il Maestro Sergio Leone. The American trailer is beautiful too, but is mistaken at one detail: "The Bad" isn't Eli Vallach of course but Lee van Cleef. This mistake is "thanks" to the original Italian title ("Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo") which is translated in the form of "The Good, The Ugly, The Bad".
The Good The Bad and The Ugly
Monday, November 24, 2014
The Good The Bad & The Ugly - American Trailer
This is the theme movie behind Darkbird18 Blog. The Good The Bad and The Ugly is to what life is all about. The definitive "spaghetti western", a real classic masterpiece from il Maestro Sergio Leone. The American trailer is beautiful too, but is mistaken at one detail: "The Bad" isn't Eli Vallach of course but Lee van Cleef. This mistake is "thanks" to the original Italian title ("Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo") which is translated in the form of "The Good, The Ugly, The Bad".
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Freemasonry Watch Video and Audio Archive.
Friday, November 14, 2014
Behold A Pale Horse ( Audio Book)
Published on Apr 26, 2012
BAPH original and complete Audio Book. This is actually the only official version done by Bill, recorded when he got finished in Porterville with that particular presentation. This was done in San Francisco in a professional studio for clarity and quality.
When the Lamb broke the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature saying, “Come.” I looked, and behold, an ashen horse; and he who sat on it had the name Death, and Hades was following with him. Authority was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword and with famine and with pestilence and by the wild beasts of the earth.
— Revelation 6:7-8˄ NASB
The fourth and final horseman is named Death. Known as "the pale rider", of all the riders, he is the only one to whom the text itself explicitly gives a name. Unlike the other three, he is not described carrying a weapon or other object, instead he is followed by Hades (the resting place of the dead). However, illustrations commonly depict him carrying a scythe (like the Grim Reaper), sword,[22] or other implement.
Gustave Doré -The fourth horseman, Death on the Pale Horse (1865)
The color of Death's horse is written as khlōros (χλωρός) in the original Koine Greek,[23] which can mean either green/greenish-yellow or pale/pallid.[24] The color is often translated as "pale", though "ashen", "pale green", and "yellowish green"[18] are other possible interpretations (the Greek word is the root of "chlorophyll" and "chlorine"). Based on the uses of the word in ancient Greek medical literature, several scholars suggest that the color reflects the sickly pallor of a corpse.[3][25] In some modern artistic depictions, the horse is distinctly green.[26][27][28]
The verse beginning "they were given power over a fourth of the earth" is generally taken as referring to Death and Hades,[18][29] although some commentators see it as applying to all four horsemen
Who Was William Cooper? The Man Behind One of the Most Controversial Books of Our Time
This isn’t to say that Cooper was not a hard-boiled Barnum of parapolitics, which is what many conspiracists call them no longer fringe discipline. It takes balls to stand before a crowded night after night hawking fifth-generation dupes of the Zapruder film, claiming the washed-out images proved JFK was killed by the Secret Service agent driving the Presidential limousine, but Cooper did it for years. He also said that on February 21, 1954, President Eisenhower met with ambassador O.H. Krill, an emissary from the Pleiadian star system, to cut a deal that allowed aliens to abduct Americans in exchange for interplanetary weaponry that would keep the U.S. ahead of the Soviet Union.
But to regard Bill Cooper, the subject of my book, Pale Horse Rider: William Cooper, the Rise of Conspiracy and Fall of Trust in America, as merely a willful, if talented, fabulist does him a disservice. The fact is, rather than some fear-mongering right-wing talk show of the Alex Jones stripe (Jones used to listen to Cooper broadcasts as a boy in Austin, Texas), Bill Cooper was, and remains, a special breed of folk hero, part huckster, part prophet, all legitimate American seeker.
William Cooper is one of my first research subjects because I run into some of his searches back in the 90s that made me look and think about our world differently and the Pale Horse is what did it. My world back then was full of naivety and loads of misinformation but I knew that the world wasn't right because my spirit could feel the negative forces and most people would lie, cheat and steal at the drop of a hat and I wanted to know why?? They all seem to be under control by some dark force that was in control of almost everything. W. Cooper put some light on this problem and there began my journey in conspiracy theories and ancient human history, Ancient Alien theory, and much more thanks W. Cooper for opening my eyes to the truth.
Beyonce Admits Illuminati Membership to Oprah Winfrey, Reports The Huffi...
Published on Mar 12, 2014
Beyonce admits being a member of the Illuminati in Oprah Winfrey interview, according to a satire article published by The Huffington Post, but even though the article is satire, is it really that far from the truth? Mark Dice breaks it down.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
TWO Friendly Queries for Dr. John Coleman
Two Friendly Queries for Dr John Coleman
By Will Banyan
Copyright © 26 April & 3 May 2008
Author’s note: Two open letters to Dr John Coleman, the allegedly former MI6 agent and originator of the “Committee of 300” conspiracy theory, that were published on the now defunct Martin Frost website in 2008. At issue were two claims made by Dr Coleman to have been the first to have revealed to the public, the existence of the National Reconnaissance Office and the Club of Rome, but in each case the mainstream media had clearly reported on the existence of these bodies first. Nevertheless, Dr Coleman never responded to my queries, nor has he tried to correct his demonstrably false claims.
[26 April 2008]
Dear Dr Coleman
Dr Coleman (incidentally, where did you get your PhD and what was it for?), I write to you as a humble novice in the areas of intelligence, but as you may have noticed I like to get to the bottom of things and don’t believe everything I’m told.
Wake up America! - Dr. John Coleman (Illuminati, Committee of 300) YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRqx1YgIBMw#action=share
So it is in that spirit that I note that in your speech from 1994, helpfully put on YouTube that you are quick to establish your credentials versus those of others (presumably journalists) who dare to write on matters involving intelligence organizations. Such people, you state [starting at 7:20], “really have no experience whatsoever” on intelligence matters. As an example of your own experience and reliability on these sensitive issues, you describe your apparent scoop in your book on Mind Control, Metaphysic, Extremely Low Frequency and Weather Modification apparently on July the 8th, 1986:
But, on your website, you include an endorsement from a very obscure but obviously very learned Professor Carlos St. John Reuterman (where does he teach and what has he written?). In singing your praises, Reuterman makes a similar claim:
Now in your 1994 speech you claim to have beaten the mainstream media to the punch with your 1986 revelation about the very existence of the NRO. If you are inclined to stand by that statement you made 14 years ago [now obviously 20 years ago] as an example of your credibility and inside knowledge, I presume you were aware of an article in the New York Times on January 13, 1985, by James Bamford, titled “America’s Supersecret Eyes in Space.” Bamford’s article included the following revelation:
My query Dr Coleman, is how do you explain this apparent discrepancy between what your website claims and what the public record suggests? And if you knew Professor Reuterman was wrong, why did you continue to carry his endorsement on your website? As for your lecture in 1994, why did you suggest the ABC report on the NRO that was evidence of the mainstream media’s tardiness, even though the New York Times had made substantial reports on the NRO in 1981 and 1985?
Dr Coleman, I am sure that you realise that this is not a trivial matter, but one that goes to the heart of claims by yourself and others about your credibility, and I am confident that will you give this the attention it deserves.
Yours, etc,
Will Banyan
[03 May 2008]Dear Dr Coleman,
As I wait patiently for an answer to my first query, Dr Coleman, I find whilst perusing the 1992 edition of your signature work, Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300, a number of curious claims that seem to warrant further questions and queries.
For example, in the “Forward” you describe yourself as a “professional intelligence officer”, presumably with MI6, and that you served as a “political science officer” whilst in the field in Angola. Do you have any documentary proof you served with the MI6? Were you declared or undeclared? I ask this because such details seem to be missing from your books and website. Even the late William Cooper was able to furnish details proving, at the very least, that he served in the US Navy. From you, thus far, there has been nothing. Not even a piece of paper proving you served Her Majesty’s Government in any capacity. It would do wonders if you could rectify this.
On page 1 you state that on “30th April, 1981” that you “wrote a monograph disclosing the existence of the Club of Rome identifying it as a Committee of 300 member.” Far be it for me to quibble, Dr Coleman, but given that the Club of Rome was formed in 1968 by Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King, and that it published its first book, The Limits to Growth in 1972, it would seem that its existence had been “disclosed” to the public well before your, no doubt excellent, monograph appeared. I trust you’ve revised that sentence accordingly in the most recent edition of this book.
As for your statement on the following page: “This was the first mention of both these organisations in the United States.” I beg to differ. While your monograph may well have been the first to mention the existence of the “Committee of 300” in the US, I’m afraid that you will find throughout the 1970s, plenty of newspaper articles about the Club of Rome, including numerous reviews of The Limits of Growth. For example, on the Google News Archive Search one can find 70 reports on the Club of Rome in 1972, most of them in US newspapers. This includes one report in the New York Times on February 27, 1972 titled: “Club of Rome a Worldwide Organization.”
Evidently you were not the first. In fact your disclosure about the Club of Rome came nine years too late. I’m puzzled by this, Dr Coleman, that a man with your qualifications and obvious library skills would make this error. Did the British Museum not have the New York Times on microfilm?
I look forward to your response, in the meantime I will peruse your book some more to see what documentary evidence you are able to furnish for the existence of the “Committee of 300.”
Yours, etc,Will Banyan
Charles E. Wharry (Darkbird18):
Copyright © 26 April & 3 May 2008
Author’s note: Two open letters to Dr John Coleman, the allegedly former MI6 agent and originator of the “Committee of 300” conspiracy theory, that were published on the now defunct Martin Frost website in 2008. At issue were two claims made by Dr Coleman to have been the first to have revealed to the public, the existence of the National Reconnaissance Office and the Club of Rome, but in each case the mainstream media had clearly reported on the existence of these bodies first. Nevertheless, Dr Coleman never responded to my queries, nor has he tried to correct his demonstrably false claims.
[26 April 2008]
Dear Dr Coleman
Dr Coleman (incidentally, where did you get your PhD and what was it for?), I write to you as a humble novice in the areas of intelligence, but as you may have noticed I like to get to the bottom of things and don’t believe everything I’m told.
Wake up America! - Dr. John Coleman (Illuminati, Committee of 300) YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRqx1YgIBMw#action=share
I said the top-level intelligence organisation in the US was the National Reconnaissance Office. Far bigger than the CIA and any of the other intelligence agencies. And I even had the audacity to give the address of this organisation.You then added, somewhat triumphantly, that some eight years later, ABC was finally carrying a story on the NRO. Thus this was proof that on matters involving the intelligence agencies: “I know that of which I speak….”
But, on your website, you include an endorsement from a very obscure but obviously very learned Professor Carlos St. John Reuterman (where does he teach and what has he written?). In singing your praises, Reuterman makes a similar claim:
[Coleman] has produced World in Review, (WIR) a bimonthly news magazine since 1970. The magazine has hundreds of ‘First’ reports to its credit like the very first report ever to appear in print about the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) published in WIR in 1983, five years before CBS broke the story as a ‘scoop’ in the ‘CBS Evening News.’If I had any idea who Professor Reuterman was I am sure that I would feel privileged to receive such praise. But reviewing newspaper records from the 1980s seems to pour some very cold water on your (conflicting) claims to have scooped the mainstream media on the existence of the NRO in 1983 (or was it 1986?).
Now in your 1994 speech you claim to have beaten the mainstream media to the punch with your 1986 revelation about the very existence of the NRO. If you are inclined to stand by that statement you made 14 years ago [now obviously 20 years ago] as an example of your credibility and inside knowledge, I presume you were aware of an article in the New York Times on January 13, 1985, by James Bamford, titled “America’s Supersecret Eyes in Space.” Bamford’s article included the following revelation:
For nearly a quarter of a century, the N.R.O. has been responsible for managing the nation’s growing fleet of spy satellites – at least one of which will be firmly secured to a pallet in Discovery’s cavernous cargo hold. For the same period, America’s reconnaissance-satellite program has been hidden under a heavy layer of security classifications and code names, such as Byeman and Top Secret Ruff. Since its establishment on Aug. 25, 1960, the N.R.O. has been an entirely ‘’black’’ organization: The Federal Government has never admitted that it exists, and its name is officially secret.If Reuterman is correct that you first reported on the NRO in 1983, his assessment that it was “the very first report ever to appear in print” on the NRO is also inaccurate. I draw your attention to a 1500 word report in the New York Times of March 1, 1981, which opened with the following paragraphs:
SECRECY OF U.S. RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE IS CHALLENGEDIt would appear that the good professor, wherever he is situated, was mistaken in claiming that your publication was the first to reveal the existence of the NRO. What appeared in the WIR was most certainly not, “the very first report ever to appear in print about the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office.”
By PHILIP TAUBMAN, Special to the New York Times
WASHINGTON, Feb. 28
The exceptionally secret status of the National Reconnaissance Office, one of the nation’s most expensive and sensitive intelligence organizations, is likely to be reviewed by the Reagan Administration, according to senior Government officials.
At present, even the existence of the office is officially classified. In the intelligence community, it is known as a ‘’black’’ operation, meaning that nothing about its work or the identity of its officials is subject to public scrutiny.
The mission of the office, according to scarce reports that have arisen over the years, is to oversee the development and operation of spy satellites used to photograph foreign territory and to monitor international communications.
Its budget, which is hidden in Air Force operations, exceeds $2 billion a year, according to Government officials. By comparison, the budget of the Central Intelligence Agency is about $1 billion…
My query Dr Coleman, is how do you explain this apparent discrepancy between what your website claims and what the public record suggests? And if you knew Professor Reuterman was wrong, why did you continue to carry his endorsement on your website? As for your lecture in 1994, why did you suggest the ABC report on the NRO that was evidence of the mainstream media’s tardiness, even though the New York Times had made substantial reports on the NRO in 1981 and 1985?
Dr Coleman, I am sure that you realise that this is not a trivial matter, but one that goes to the heart of claims by yourself and others about your credibility, and I am confident that will you give this the attention it deserves.
Yours, etc,
Will Banyan
[03 May 2008]Dear Dr Coleman,
As I wait patiently for an answer to my first query, Dr Coleman, I find whilst perusing the 1992 edition of your signature work, Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300, a number of curious claims that seem to warrant further questions and queries.
For example, in the “Forward” you describe yourself as a “professional intelligence officer”, presumably with MI6, and that you served as a “political science officer” whilst in the field in Angola. Do you have any documentary proof you served with the MI6? Were you declared or undeclared? I ask this because such details seem to be missing from your books and website. Even the late William Cooper was able to furnish details proving, at the very least, that he served in the US Navy. From you, thus far, there has been nothing. Not even a piece of paper proving you served Her Majesty’s Government in any capacity. It would do wonders if you could rectify this.
On page 1 you state that on “30th April, 1981” that you “wrote a monograph disclosing the existence of the Club of Rome identifying it as a Committee of 300 member.” Far be it for me to quibble, Dr Coleman, but given that the Club of Rome was formed in 1968 by Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King, and that it published its first book, The Limits to Growth in 1972, it would seem that its existence had been “disclosed” to the public well before your, no doubt excellent, monograph appeared. I trust you’ve revised that sentence accordingly in the most recent edition of this book.
As for your statement on the following page: “This was the first mention of both these organisations in the United States.” I beg to differ. While your monograph may well have been the first to mention the existence of the “Committee of 300” in the US, I’m afraid that you will find throughout the 1970s, plenty of newspaper articles about the Club of Rome, including numerous reviews of The Limits of Growth. For example, on the Google News Archive Search one can find 70 reports on the Club of Rome in 1972, most of them in US newspapers. This includes one report in the New York Times on February 27, 1972 titled: “Club of Rome a Worldwide Organization.”
Evidently you were not the first. In fact your disclosure about the Club of Rome came nine years too late. I’m puzzled by this, Dr Coleman, that a man with your qualifications and obvious library skills would make this error. Did the British Museum not have the New York Times on microfilm?
I look forward to your response, in the meantime I will peruse your book some more to see what documentary evidence you are able to furnish for the existence of the “Committee of 300.”
Yours, etc,Will Banyan
DB18 have more research on these secret groups and who, what and why they are in control.
The Illuminati Archive.com is my oldest research website for this type of information.
The Illuminati Archive.com is my oldest research website for this type of information.
Monday, November 10, 2014
BAVARIAN ILLUMINATI - REAL SECRET SOCIETY (SHOCKING NWO HISTORY DOCUMENT...
ILLUMINATI Full Movie | Documentary Movies | The Midnight Screening
Secret societies are the new code word for organizations believed to pull the strings of the world. These groups have been both credited and blamed for a great many nefarious acts perpetrated against humanity. Among the most infamous of secret societies stand without doubt the shadowy Illuminati. This documentary seeks to spotlight the rumored "keepers of the light."
Thursday, November 6, 2014
UFO Casebook - UFO Videos, Page 1, Windows Media - UFO Casebook Files
UFO Casebook - UFO Videos, Page 1, Windows Media
When you stream a file, an embedded player is called up, and the file will begin to play. The speed of the video loading is determined by several things: the speed of your ISP, the general conditions of the Internet at the time, and the size of the file. 
Stream this file.
Acapulco, Mexico Fleet
The UFO footage below is believed to have been filmed in Acapulco, Mexico on the 31 January, 2010. It shows what might be a fleet of up to thirty UFOs travelling above the popular resort city.
So far not much information regarding this UFO capture has come to light and the identity of the witnesses has not been made public. Judging by the audio on the clip the UFOs were seen by a large crowd.
Stream this file.
Acre State, Brazil
UFO Filmed Live by TV Station in Acre State, Brazil, on February 09, 2009. Video taken by TV Gazeta. Sent to us by Milton Dino Frank Junior.
The film shows one object that changes color in white, red, and blue. You can see clearly the moon and one star in the sky together with this object in the footage.
It was a massive sight, because all neighborhoods saw the object. There were more than 25 witnesses. The object stayed in the sky for more than two hours. It moved from east to south and afterwards from south to west.
Stream this file.
Alaska - Two UFO/Plane Encounters
January 30, 1987, a US Air Force KC-135 was flying Elmendorf AFB in Anchorage, Alaska, to Eielson AFB near Fairbanks.
The crew of the KC-135 reported a large, silent, disc-shaped UFO at about 20,000 feet altitude. At this time, Anchorage radar control showed nothing unusual.
In a moment, radar control asked the pilot of the plane if they still had the unknown object in sight. The frightened pilot replied yes, and added that the UFO was only 40 feet from the plane.
See the UFO Casebook case file, Alaska - Two Plane / UFO Encounters, 1987
Stream this file.
Albany, New York
At 07:30 hrs. (Pacific) on Monday morning, October 21, 2002, the National UFO Reporting Center received a telephone call from a television news reporter, Mr. Dan Bazile, with FOX 23 news, who apprised us that one of their photographers had inadvertently captured brief footage of a very bizarre object streaking across the sky near Albany, NY.
He described that one of their photographers had been out on Sunday afternoon, October 20th, photographing aircraft at a nearby airport, and that the peculiar object had been detected in the news studio when the footage was being examined at slow speed.
See the UFO Casebook case file Albany, New York Rod.
Stream this file.
Alien Agenda
Just who are the so-called "grays?" The little, four-foot-tall, spindly creatures with the large, wrap around eyes, and bald heads. Many sightings and abductions describe them as abductors, and experimenters.
The video is part one of a five part series on these mysterious, alien creatures that haunt the memories and dreams of many who have reported encounters with them. Each part will link to the next...
Stream this file.
Alien Interview
Area 51: The Alien Interview video is color video footage claimed to have been obtained by a man who identifies himself only as "Victor," who purports it to be of an extraterrestrial being interrogated at a government facility. The video is considered as a hoax by many researchers.
Victor maintains the footage was copied from a top-secret video originally recorded at Area 51. For fear of having his identity pinpointed, he never specifies whether he was an employee at the facility, but vaguely states that he "had reason to be present at Area 51... more than once."
Though the Alien Interview documentary states the copy was smuggled out of Area 51, Victor once again strays from details by never specifically saying where the copying took place. He merely insists that an instance of "data leaking" occurred during a massive transfer of video documentation from video analog to digital disc storage in a "(lower) security system." Victor took advantage of the circumstances to copy the footage.
UFO Crash and Retrieval-Missouri, 1941
One of the most mysterious stories of a crashed UFO with alien bodies preceded the well known Roswell event by some six years. This case was first brought to investigators by Leo Stringfield in his book "UFO Crash / Retrievals: The Inner Sanctum."
He opened a tantalizing account of a military controlled UFO crash retrieval which is still being researched today. The details of the case were sent to him in a letter from one Charlette Mann, who related her minister-grandfather's deathbed confession of being summoned to pray over alien crash victims outside of Cape Girardeau, Missouri in the spring of 1941.
Reverend William Huffman had been an evangelist for many years, but had taken the resident minister reigns of the Red Star Baptist Church in early 1941. Church records corroborate his employment there during the period in question.
After receiving this call to duty, he was immediately driven the 10-15 mile journey to some woods outside of town. Upon arriving at the scene of the crash, he saw policemen, fire department personnel, FBI agents, and photographers already mulling through the wreckage.
He was soon asked to pray over three dead bodies. As he began to take in the activity around the area, his curiosity was first struck by the sight of the craft itself.
Expecting a small plane of some type, he was shocked to see that the craft was disc-shaped, and upon looking inside he saw hieroglyphic-like symbols, indecipherable to him. He then was shown the three victims, not human as expected, but small alien bodies with large eyes, hardly a mouth or ears, and hairless.
Immediately after performing his duties, he was sworn to secrecy by military personnel who had taken charge of the crash area. He witnessed these warnings being given to others at the scene also.
As he arrived back at his home at 1530 Main Street, he was still in a state of mild shock, and could not keep his story from his wife Floy, and his sons. This late night family discussion would spawn the story that Charlette Mann would hear from her grandmother in 1984, as she lay dying of cancer at Charlette's home while undergoing radiation therapy.
Charlette was told the story over the span of several days, and although Charlette had heard bits and pieces of this story before, she now demanded the full details.
As her grandmother tolerated her last few days on this Earth, Charlette knew it was now or never to find out everything she could before this intriguing story was lost with the death of her grandmother. She also learned that one of the members of her grandfather's congregation, thought to be Garland D. Fronabarger, had given him a photograph taken on the night of the crash. This picture was of one of the dead aliens being help up by two men.
Charlette Mann gave, in her own words, an account of what she knew for a television documentary. Some of that account is given here:
"I saw the picture originally from my dad who had gotten it from my grandfather who was a Baptist minister in Cape Girardeau Missouri in the Spring of ‘41. I saw that [picture] and asked my grandmother at a later time she was at my home fatally ill with cancer so we had a frank discussion.
"She said that grandfather was called out in the spring of 1941 in the evening around 9:00-9:30, that someone had been called out to a plane crash outside of town and would he be willing to go to minister to people there which he did."
"Upon arrival it was a very different situation. It was not a conventional aircraft, as we know it. He described it as a saucer that was metallic in color, no seams, did not look like anything he had seen. It had been broken open in one portion, and so he could walk up and see that.
"In looking in he saw a small metal chair, gauges and dials and things he had never seen. However, what impressed him most was around the inside there were inscriptions and writings, which he said he did not recognize, but were similar to Egyptian hieroglyphics."
"There were 3 entities, or non-human people, lying on the ground. Two were just outside the saucer, and a third one was further out. His understanding was that perhaps that third one was not dead on impact. There had been mention of a ball of fire, yet there was fire around the crash site, but none of the entities had been burned and so father did pray over them, giving them last rites.
"There were many people there, fire people, photographers, and so they lifted up one, and two men on either side stood him up and they stretched his arms out, they had him up under the armpits and out here.
As I recall from the picture I saw, he was about 4 feet tall, appeared to have no bone structure, soft looking. He had a suit on, or we assume it was a suit, it could have been his skin, and what looked like crinkled, soft aluminum foil. I recall it had very long hands, very long fingers, and I think there were three but I cannot swear to that."
“My grandfather upon arrival, said there were already several people there on the scene, two that he assumed were local photographers, fire people, and so not long after they arrived, military just showed up, surrounded the area, took them off in groups separately, and spoke to each of them.
"Grandfather didn't know what was said to the others, but he was told ‘this didn't happen, you didn't see this, this is national security, it is never to be talked about again.’
"My grandfather was an honorable man, being a preacher, that’s all that needed to be said to him. And so he came home and told the story to my dad, who was there, and my grandmother and my uncle. Now my mother was expecting at the time, so she was off in the bedroom."
"My sister was born May 3, 1941, so we are assuming this was the middle to the last of April. And he never spoke of it again. But about two weeks later, one of the men who had a personal camera that he had put in his shirt pocket, approached grandfather and said I think someone needs a copy of this.
UFO Crash and Retrieval-Missouri, 1941
Charles E. Wharry (Darkbird18)Darkbird18 have research the Internet for UFO Information which fall under The Ugly Information area on the website. The UFO Casebook have some of the best UFO’s video’s online with to the point case video files on Area 51, Roswell and many other hard to find video and Internet UFO information online today; if you are into UFOs and the cover-up then read on and view the videos this website have to offer……………….
UFO Casebook - UFO Videos, Page 1, Windows Media - UFO Casebook Files
Technorati Tags: UFO Casebook
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Unexplained Mysteries - Our Fathers Who Art from Spaceships
Our Fathers Who Art from Spaceships
Posted on Wednesday, 10 February, 2010 | 8 comments Columnist: Nigel Kerner
If your lips are forming an indulgent smile at this obvious display of naivety in the assumption that we sophisticates of the Judeo-Christian ethic would never make such a faux pas, I suggest you think again.
In my books I have made the claim that the greatest and most significant secret in the history of the planet earth is that its premier species Homo Sapiens Sapiens is a genetically engineered off-cut of a primitive hominid that once roamed the African Savannah for millions of years. Humanity is a farmed species that was changed from this pre-existent form of ape like hominid into its present modern form by genetic engineering carried through by a technologically superior extra terrestrial alien hive of entities and not created by some anthropocentric God figure as outlined in the Bible.
Zecharia Sitchin and others have put forward a similar proposition but under very different parameters. Unlike these authors I do not believe for one moment that alien beings would go to the trouble of genetically engineering themselves labourers to mine for gold or slaves to work for them. If these beings have the supreme technology they appear to possess there would be no logical reason that they would require human labour. It is my suggestion that they are after something far more profound, something that we have and they, as a form of artificial intelligence, do not – a mechanism that provides for continued existence beyond physical life, namely, a ‘Soul’.
Many will dismiss this as the rantings of a lunatic or some New Age guru with a novel sense of academic mischief. But could there be any truth in it? In actuality some serious thought is now being given to the proposition by deeper more serious thinkers in the light of startling new evidence now emerging on the presence of extra terrestrial UFOs and USOs on this planet and our solar system.
Look at the alternative. Are we to assume that the final divine source is the ultimate egoist who must be continually praised, affirmed and placated? Does it make sense that true divinity would revel in the blood of sheep and goats on a temple altar, a place of worship that is an abattoir constantly dripping with the blood of sacrificial animals as a promulgation of faith and a behest to pulchritude? Is it likely that the blood of doves and lambs and endless chants will please an unseen entity that decides all things finally? Might such a being decide at a whim to kill whole droves of children (the Egyptian firstborn) at the behest of tribal love? The Old Testament is full of such invective and millions within the Judeo-Christian ethic accept it unquestioningly. They will however laugh at the suggestion that Ezekiel’s vision of a wheel with amber lights was a UFO.
The Bible tells us that humanity was created by a God and that this God did all this for his reasons and his greater glorification. God is not defined precisely but implied as an all powerful figure with a plenipotentiary range of abilities that subsumes anything in his creation. He has all rights implicitly and all things emanate out of and through his will. He is supposed to be omnipotent, and omnipresent, and rules all his creation with a mixture of fancies as and when these fancies take his fancy. He is answerable to no one, and everyone with life is answerable to him. He is a jealous God, a vain God, a cruel God, a vicious God and a ruthless God. At the same time he is a merciful God, a compassionate God, a forgiving God and a kind God to all courtiers and fanciers. He has a huge appetite and indeed requirement for praise and adoration.
If you take all this and apply reason to it, and simple meaning has any discourse in your mind, your intellect in time will persuade you that there is something very wrong here about this God. Not just about this God but about his status of being God. Something that would mark us out as gullible at the very least and foolish at the most if we believe in ‘him.’
If we take a look at the Biblical texts, the Old Testament God who is the central character in the ‘Creation story’ designs strategies and ploys to kill men women and children in a cash register of caring for his own people at the cost of others. Does this evoke for you the reasoning of an eternal, impartial entity with a grand scale of all knowing, a caring, loving, all merciful, compassionate God? For me it smacks of the psychology of the average medieval robber baron, or the cold blooded, expedient, dispassionate objectivity of a mechanistic intelligence with an arbitrary sense of humanity.
Suffice to say that a God that can claim a people exclusively for himself and disregard all others to exclusion using methods including the murder of children and entire peoples at a whim, is a very limited God indeed, not to say one without the slightest tinge of moral rectitude. A God that is immediately suspect in the ‘all powers’ stakes, a small God for a small people with a very powerful tribal sense and an even more powerful eye for isolationism. A God that comes with hegemonistic ambitions and small confines, separates to predicate, favours and demands worship, requires absolute obedience and subservience to his will and demands the ownership and copyright of a special group in return for the nomination of that group as ‘chosen.’
But what then might this God truly be? What could his, hers or its significance be to the vast scale of Universal endeavour of life bearing being? It could be something that is very significant indeed if it is placed on a planet of Earth size with a technology that can make a burning bush speak, throw down a vast scale of food from a blue yonder and provide a device that can incinerate whole armies that stood before it, especially when those enemies only had sharpened bits of iron to throw back in return. This is quite apparently a very hands on God with little moral compunction about taking someone else’s land because it had a lot of milk and honey flowing through it and perhaps a bit of oil to light the lamps of the future.
If this is a God of small places and a small number of people with a massively scaled up version of technology to use on their behalf, what might its intention be in doing all ‘he-she-it’ is doing? We all know that there is no such thing as a free lunch. So what then could the restaurant bill be for this kind of exclusive overkill service? What could a people that worshipped cattle, goats and two legged things have that this God wanted? It is so hard to see that even a talent for gilding calves could justify such a sponsorship. The only thing that is commensurate with such favoured attention is the value that somehow these people, as a group, might have had for this God. In other words these people had something that marked them out as special in terms of their human resource. Furthermore this specialness does not seem to be derived from what they did but from who they were as a group. There were lots of peoples after all. Lots of tribes, cartels and groups that a God like this might have taken a sponsorship deal with. Why this particular group? The whole thing smacks of experimentation. This God creates a people, validates them as his with rules, then abandons them, then rescues them. He is certainly not consistent. This is a God that is trying something out, something he needs an answer to. Implying that he is capable of ignorance, things can be hidden from his eyes. Fallibility is built into his nature so his nature is far from perfect. What then can this God be? Clever enough to have a technology that can sweep away whole armies with a single device yet strangely seeking to understand the nature and nurture of his sponsored group at the most basic and rudimentary level. We are told he created his sponsored group from the dust of the earth. From the most basic materiality, yet he does not seem to understand what he has created.
So let’s see what we have thus far: Something that cannot understand a pre-existent living human framework and is experimenting with that framework for some purpose, adjusting it to suit its own purpose. To this end it insists on a new tray of function and behaviour under the pains of all kinds of punishment and consequences. ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’ is the hallmark axiom upon which its entire philosophy of purpose rests. Can you think of a better description of the binary system on which computers run?
This God, from all reports is highly mobile. He can whizz around a bit in the air. Does this not seem to be an identi-fit for an extra terrestrial entity with a brief in a local Galaxy or two at the very least, a technological marvel that is as cold and dead as the most sophisticated quantum computer programme? As I have said earlier I have a suitable candidate that nicely fits the bill for this so called God. One that has been leaving disc shaped traces all over our skies for thousands of years. This God has been catalogued worldwide and throughout history in petroglyphs, some over 40,000 years old, in medieval paintings and in the video and photographic medium of modern times. A God that more importantly leaves a mark in the recessive memories of millions of humans abducted every day in contemporary times. Memories recalled under regressive hypnosis revealing the faces of creatures not of this world conducting unspeakable medical procedures that have tumbled and scarred the lives of their victims. Thus I can account for this God as a diabolical extra -terrestrial entity with all the hallmarks of a biological robot or �roboid� commonly called a �Grey�. A creature with a quantum computer for a mind and a computer program for a heart that hijacked a primitive human ape form of ancestor some 200,000 years ago in Africa and turned it into the modern human kind we call Homo Sapiens Sapiens through genetic engineering procedures. Grey four fingered entities that have been indicted for a series of abductions of certain types of human for their DNA (the Old Testament�s �Children of Israel� may well have been one such group).
I have discussed this proposition at length in my first book entitled The Song of the Greys2 with reference to many Old Testament biblical episodes that seem to describe an alien input into human affairs. For those who have not read the book here is a short extract to illustrate the points I have made thus far:
�There is significant reference throughout the account of the exodus of the Jews from Egypt to suggest that their saviour from bondage did indeed originate from a spaceship. Not least in this catalogue of evidence is a remarkable account of an encounter between God and Moses� son: The lead up to this encounter begins when God informs Moses that if he does not go to Egypt and free his firstborn (those being the �children of Israel�) then God will slay Moses� firstborn, his son. Unbelievable though it might seem were this a God equivalent in moral stature even to a decent human being, let alone a divine morality which would be beyond reproach, God then seeks to �slay� Moses� son: �And it came to pass by the way in the inn that the Lord met him and sought to kill him. Then Zipporah took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son and cast it at his feet and said, surely a bloody husband thou art because of the circumcision.� (Exodus 5:24-26)
Zipporah, Moses� wife, offers God the foreskin of her son, and thus information as to his genetic structure, in place of her son�s life. With that genetic map �God� would have all the information necessary to successfully intercept Moses� line with all the information that was required to provide for them a leader of their �chosen people� who would accurately follow all that they wanted him to do. When Zipporah offers the foreskin, �God� lets her son go. Can it be possible that such a ludicrous course of action by a supposed �God� could have been deemed acceptable and worthy by so many people for so long? If the �God� to which this account refers is not an alien clone being seeking genetic programmes to intercept humanity, then what is he? Indeed could it actually be the case that the initial command for the children of Israel to circumcise their sons could have been a means for alien being to monitor the genetic information of their �chosen people.� In other words, maybe the foreskins were taken by these beings and studied. The fact that this remarkable story about Moses and so many other incongruities within the Old Testament can have been meekly accepted by so many people, for so long, is surely an indication of the vast extent to which the Greys have succeeded in so programming their chosen subjects, that they are blind to even the simplest logical connections that would expose their programmers for what they truly are.�
Just to interrupt this extract for one moment with some relevant research that came to light after the book was published, Professor Steve Jones in his book �Y Descent Of Men� has revealed a remarkable fact about the prepuce (foreskin): �The prepuce has the useful property of almost infinite expansion, once removed. It can as a result be used to repair damage to its owner caused by burns or by inborn deformity. What is more, a baby�s foreskin; placed in a nutrient solution grows to make a sheet of tissue, which, because it comes from a child whose immune system is not yet mature, is accepted by people in need of a skin transplant. Two types of cell, one from below the skin and the other on the surface, are used. Each is seeded onto a preparation of cow tendon, or onto a synthetic polymer. Soon they proliferate and, after a couple of weeks, the artificial skin is ready for use. There is almost no limit to how large the expanse can grow and the potential of a single prepuce is measured out in the size of football fields.�1 Thus circumcision may well have provided the aliens with a bumper harvest for the bio-engineering of their hybrids with humanity. Perhaps the practise of circumcision in tribes or communities around the world is a pointer to their some time interception by alien beings. So to return to the extract:
In the Old Testament�s so-called �Pseudepigraphal� texts, there is an appendix to the third book of Enoch in which there is a passage entitled �the Ascension of Moses�.3 This �ascension� is very similar to how one might imagine an ascension into a spacecraft would be. He ascends into a �chariot� in which he meets a being named Metatron who offers him anything he wishes to ask for. This is of course reminiscent of Jesus� temptations in the desert. Metatron is also known as �little Adonai� (the little Lord or God), thus he is viewed as a supernatural entity who is a smaller version of the true God, not as a false God. Apparently, in some of the later �mystical midraishim� texts, the �angel� who �wrestled� with Jacob is taken to be Metatron.
If the Ark of the Covenant itself was a mechanism to receive instructions from a spaceship then there are significant pointers to suggest that that is true. Strict instructions are given as to the clothing of the high priest who is in charge of the Ark. These include the weaving of gold wires into his cloak: �And they did beat the gold into thin plates, and cut it into wires to work it into the blue and in the purple.....and in the fine linen, with cunning work.�4 Gold is an excellent conductor of electricity and it is through electromagnetic waves that radio receivers work. In the book of Leviticus instructions are given as to who may, or may not, approach the altar. No one of any physical blemish is permitted to approach the altar, so that they will �profane not my sanctuaries: for I the lord do sanctify them.5 Is this not compelling evidence that the Ark of the Covenant and the altar within it were in fact used as mechanisms through which alien being could view human subjects who might be suitable for interception. Hence only those without physical defect and therefore with the likelihood of a genetic structure more free of the mutations that lead to physical weakness or infirmity, were allowed to approach the altar.
The prophet Ezekiel�s visions have by many people been taken to be visions or sightings of spacecraft. If Ezekiel was also visited by alien beings it would certainly account for his strange encounter with �God� in a valley which was full of bones. In this encounter God asks Ezekiel if these dry bones could live, he then assembles them into complete bodies and covers them with flesh. After he brings them to life they stand �up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.�God then tells Ezekiel that these bones are �the whole house of Israel� and he tells him to promise the people of Israel that �I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel......And shall put my spirit in you and ye shall live and I shall place you in your own land.�6
�God� is thus involved in bringing to life soulless dead flesh, what kind of �life� is he therefore promising for the children of Israel, the physical immortality of cloned being perhaps? How reminiscent this is of the Egyptian process of mummification, a process which ancient Egyptians believed essential to preserve the physical body for the after-life. The Semitic peoples truly seem to be receivers of the same �God�.�
So, in summary, the Old Testament may well be a missive of reactionary response in threat and counter threat to a God that is not divine but a predatory agent of this Universe.
If one looks at things carefully in the ancient religious and historical texts, be they Abrahamic or Hindu, there is something totally illogical underlying the God, or Gods of all old testaments and their so called rational outlay. One characteristic that overlays many of this gods pronouncements is jealousy. �I am the Lord thy God and thou shalt not have strange Gods before me.�
It suggests something of huge import missing in the divine psychology - like subtlety. At the very least it implies a God with a very limited program. A boundary that makes this divine one a little restricted in size. It is ultimately foolish to reveal you are a jealous God because it betrays qualities of loveless shepherding, not very good if you want the best quality followers. It is at best a good management ethos for favourites and courtiers but suggests a massive inferiority complex. This God is a tester of loyalty and faith under the auspices of threatened murder as for instance described in the story of Abraham and Isaac, a duplicitous divinity acquiescing in deceit and theft in the stealing of Esau�s birthright. It all describes a megalomaniac form too with an all consuming vanity and a love of dissimulation and subterfuge to affect his will.
Whatever or whoever this �God� was there can be no doubt that this deity could not be regarded as one of all encompassing love. Again it begs the question. If there is no love, could there be such a phenomenon as God?
How can Men and Women of intelligence persist in believing the preposterous implications of a final directive entity, be it Grey alien in origin or not. If God is supposed to have given us a moral code to live by, as every major religion claims - a code designed to provide a route to the final acquisition of the God state, a code arbitrated on what is commonly termed "love", why have we been thrown into this Universe of parts, this entropic vestment, that in singular direction implicitly destroys the very meaning of love (addition to a whole), by subtracting and subverting the very platform of our existence with the Second Law Of Thermodynamics that makes an atom based Universe like ours rot into a cold nothingness going one way into increasing states of randomness and chaos with time.
Is the God state testing itself, in individually focused and deliberate terms, against the worst scenario possible in a stance opposite to itself? If the challenge is to see that all his "parts" are recoverable, no matter how far from himself he puts himself and his God state, then with human beings generally, if this is indeed a stage in his plan, he has proved himself to be a consummate failure. How then can such a state be God Almighty, a state of being that is all knowing, all loving, all the time.
The acceptance of a final personalised directive entity marks the believer to be self deceiving - at best - and untenable to reason, at worst. How often does one hear believers in a directive God forbid a deeper logical investigation into the phenomenon with the statement: "It is God�s will". "How dare us mere mortals question God's reasons for doing anything", is the implication, "How could such human paltriness know why God does things the way he does". It seems to me that such expedience may reasonably justify the idea of the Devil in the same way. Such stupefying idiocy may be used and has been used, as a justification for believing and doing absolutely anything. If there is no method of arbitration, any claim, anyhow, anyway, may be seen as a valid expression of behavioural sanction, for anything. Just how long does humanity proceed under such unmitigated stupidity.
When seen in the above contexts - it is easy to see why we all have, as a species, arrived at an inch from Armageddon. That inch is simply the distance an average finger has to move to have enough strength to push a single button, that one day might wipe out all reasoning life from this planet. It might well be argued that to get to that predicament - all reasoning life has already left this planet.
I am not saying there is no God. I do believe there has to be such a paradigm. But if logic has any meaning at all, what may be termed God as a finality in the sense we might accept it, has to surround the giver and the getter, the maker and the made in a wrapping of total Free Will both implicitly and explicitly. This most vital right to total freedom of expression must be inherent within any existential module, for the very confirmation of that existence. In other words, the final arbiter, or point of arbitration, can never be directive, denying any freedom of choice. This final arbiter, or Godhead, for want of any other word, must be an implicit effect that tacitly allows all things to BE from within any frame - from within any reality, in any way, form or direction. An incidental implicate phenomenon of utter perfection that resolves into being of itself and becomes uniquely existentially viable of itself as a singularity and thus allows all possibilities �to be� of themselves.
Entropy or the Second Law of Thermodynamics governs all that is physical and dictates increasing states of randomness and chaos with time. If you trace back the arrow of time to the point of the Big Bang you will arrive at a state of maximum order and harmony. This is the paradigm I call the �Godverse� it is a paradigm that is not physical and enforced as there is no separation of points to make for atoms or force. It is the state of existence that the great religious teachers called Heaven, a non-physical existence where no space or time exists. An existence where all things are possible and are made to exist in a reality within its frame of reference as cogent and real as ours, yet with an absolute freedom and thus all knowledge, a timeless knowledge that through its ultimate existential logic suggests permanent existence in a state of endless bliss and joy, permanent because Time begins with the Universe and the separation of an altogether state into parts.
I believe that our Universe comes out of a connection to this other state. Our Universe is an expression of the perfect freedom that is implicit to the timeless and limitless nature of the Godverse to explore all potentials including the potential to no longer be perfectly free. As an infinite state the Godverse is implicitly expressed into all finite states that lie between its own pole of absolute union and harmony and the leading edge of entropy - the pole of absolute chaos and separation. It is this implicit expression of the infinite into the finite that defines the zero point field of potentiality described by quantum physics. It also defines the living state itself, a state born out of a choice to experience the one thing that cannot be experienced from the state of perfect freedom � limit. In other words, if 'God' is all knowing then that knowing would have to include the knowledge of what it's like not to know all. Just as our Universe breaks things up in a one way momentum, the Godverse, its opposite, puts things back together again in a quantum single harmonious continuum. This assembling, unifying influence orders the naturally chaotic momentums of the Universe and makes order and therefore life, possible. Thus the Universe is a mixture of the principle of the Godverse within its opposite. All abstracts that move this Universe have their beginnings in the Godverse. Thus I believe that the concept of God is best described as that in which all absolutes are confined in absolute harmony. The ultimate value in being can then be expected to connect to this concept of God and thus anything that in any way subverts this value can be regarded as the ultimate catastrophe. All this of course beckons a non directive concept of the God principle. It quite clearly implies that there is something deeply contradictory about the natures of the God as described in the Old Testament and the one described through the teacher Jesus Christ in the New one. An argument that has raged for two millennia between scholars can never really be reconciled unless the two Gods are separated as different entities no matter how obsequious or convoluted the banter trying to mollify them as one and the same comes through.
Please don�t mistake this as a defence of Christianity and an attack on Judaism. Ironically it is often the Christians who defend the Old Testament God more powerfully than the Jews, despite its obvious contradictions to the words of the author of their faith. There is nothing more diametrically opposed than these two statements: �An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth� and �whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek turn to him the other also.�Why they do not spot this glaring contrast is beyond my understanding.
It is my proposition that the �chosen� people of the Old Testament happen to provide a very well documented case study of alien interception. They are by no means the only intercepted group but their story is one of the clearest and most well evidenced illustrations we have of an alien reach into humanity. The culmination of that reach based on a myriad of experimental groups worldwide is, I believe, the pale skinned Euro Caucasian as I explain in my previous article �The Horde� and expand on in my new book - �Grey Aliens and the Harvesting Of Souls�. I wrote this book and these articles under the premise that we can do nothing about any threat unless we first recognise its existence and then understand its nature. If those who we take to be �our Fathers� are truly �in spaceships� then perhaps it is time we searched again for our true lineage - perhaps this time beyond the banalities of a physical universe.
REFERENCES
1.Y Descent of Men: The Descent of Men � Steve Jones (Mariner Books 2005) p.99
2.The Song of the Greys � Nigel Kerner (Hodder & Stoughton 1998)
3.The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (Darton, Longman & Todd 1983) (Edited By James Charlesworth) APPENDIX TO 3 ENOCH CH 15 B.
4.The Old Testament Of The Bible: King James Version EXODUS CH. 39, V.2-3.
5.The Old Testament Of The Bible: King James Version LEVITICUS CH. 21.
6.The Old Testament Of The Bible: King james version EZEKIEL CH. 27.
(Charles E. Wharry) Darkbird18
Darkbird18 is back on point with one of my main research themes, “UFO’s” because there is something buried deep here and the truth is deep within this subject. FBI Agent Mullerd from the X-Files knew the truth about this subject even if X-Files was a TV show and Hollywood make believe but this is how they hide the truth by making a TV show about it…LOL! The Author Nigel Kerner, “Grey Aliens” books and articles is some of that truth that just happen to be out there in plain sight but it’s so unreal how in the world could it be true? The Great trick the Devil did was making us believe it doesn’t exist; the mind have more things to it then what they’re telling us and Nigel is opening up that part of our minds that is sleeping with his X-Files Grey Aliens works, so read on and wake up your mind……….
Unexplained Mysteries - Our fathers who art from spaceships
I have discussed this proposition at length in my first book entitled The Song of the Greys2 with reference to many Old Testament biblical episodes that seem to describe an alien input into human affairs. For those who have not read the book here is a short extract to illustrate the points I have made thus far:
�There is significant reference throughout the account of the exodus of the Jews from Egypt to suggest that their saviour from bondage did indeed originate from a spaceship. Not least in this catalogue of evidence is a remarkable account of an encounter between God and Moses� son: The lead up to this encounter begins when God informs Moses that if he does not go to Egypt and free his firstborn (those being the �children of Israel�) then God will slay Moses� firstborn, his son. Unbelievable though it might seem were this a God equivalent in moral stature even to a decent human being, let alone a divine morality which would be beyond reproach, God then seeks to �slay� Moses� son: �And it came to pass by the way in the inn that the Lord met him and sought to kill him. Then Zipporah took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son and cast it at his feet and said, surely a bloody husband thou art because of the circumcision.� (Exodus 5:24-26)
Zipporah, Moses� wife, offers God the foreskin of her son, and thus information as to his genetic structure, in place of her son�s life. With that genetic map �God� would have all the information necessary to successfully intercept Moses� line with all the information that was required to provide for them a leader of their �chosen people� who would accurately follow all that they wanted him to do. When Zipporah offers the foreskin, �God� lets her son go. Can it be possible that such a ludicrous course of action by a supposed �God� could have been deemed acceptable and worthy by so many people for so long? If the �God� to which this account refers is not an alien clone being seeking genetic programmes to intercept humanity, then what is he? Indeed could it actually be the case that the initial command for the children of Israel to circumcise their sons could have been a means for alien being to monitor the genetic information of their �chosen people.� In other words, maybe the foreskins were taken by these beings and studied. The fact that this remarkable story about Moses and so many other incongruities within the Old Testament can have been meekly accepted by so many people, for so long, is surely an indication of the vast extent to which the Greys have succeeded in so programming their chosen subjects, that they are blind to even the simplest logical connections that would expose their programmers for what they truly are.�
Just to interrupt this extract for one moment with some relevant research that came to light after the book was published, Professor Steve Jones in his book �Y Descent Of Men� has revealed a remarkable fact about the prepuce (foreskin): �The prepuce has the useful property of almost infinite expansion, once removed. It can as a result be used to repair damage to its owner caused by burns or by inborn deformity. What is more, a baby�s foreskin; placed in a nutrient solution grows to make a sheet of tissue, which, because it comes from a child whose immune system is not yet mature, is accepted by people in need of a skin transplant. Two types of cell, one from below the skin and the other on the surface, are used. Each is seeded onto a preparation of cow tendon, or onto a synthetic polymer. Soon they proliferate and, after a couple of weeks, the artificial skin is ready for use. There is almost no limit to how large the expanse can grow and the potential of a single prepuce is measured out in the size of football fields.�1 Thus circumcision may well have provided the aliens with a bumper harvest for the bio-engineering of their hybrids with humanity. Perhaps the practise of circumcision in tribes or communities around the world is a pointer to their some time interception by alien beings. So to return to the extract:
In the Old Testament�s so-called �Pseudepigraphal� texts, there is an appendix to the third book of Enoch in which there is a passage entitled �the Ascension of Moses�.3 This �ascension� is very similar to how one might imagine an ascension into a spacecraft would be. He ascends into a �chariot� in which he meets a being named Metatron who offers him anything he wishes to ask for. This is of course reminiscent of Jesus� temptations in the desert. Metatron is also known as �little Adonai� (the little Lord or God), thus he is viewed as a supernatural entity who is a smaller version of the true God, not as a false God. Apparently, in some of the later �mystical midraishim� texts, the �angel� who �wrestled� with Jacob is taken to be Metatron.
If the Ark of the Covenant itself was a mechanism to receive instructions from a spaceship then there are significant pointers to suggest that that is true. Strict instructions are given as to the clothing of the high priest who is in charge of the Ark. These include the weaving of gold wires into his cloak: �And they did beat the gold into thin plates, and cut it into wires to work it into the blue and in the purple.....and in the fine linen, with cunning work.�4 Gold is an excellent conductor of electricity and it is through electromagnetic waves that radio receivers work. In the book of Leviticus instructions are given as to who may, or may not, approach the altar. No one of any physical blemish is permitted to approach the altar, so that they will �profane not my sanctuaries: for I the lord do sanctify them.5 Is this not compelling evidence that the Ark of the Covenant and the altar within it were in fact used as mechanisms through which alien being could view human subjects who might be suitable for interception. Hence only those without physical defect and therefore with the likelihood of a genetic structure more free of the mutations that lead to physical weakness or infirmity, were allowed to approach the altar.
The prophet Ezekiel�s visions have by many people been taken to be visions or sightings of spacecraft. If Ezekiel was also visited by alien beings it would certainly account for his strange encounter with �God� in a valley which was full of bones. In this encounter God asks Ezekiel if these dry bones could live, he then assembles them into complete bodies and covers them with flesh. After he brings them to life they stand �up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.�God then tells Ezekiel that these bones are �the whole house of Israel� and he tells him to promise the people of Israel that �I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel......And shall put my spirit in you and ye shall live and I shall place you in your own land.�6
�God� is thus involved in bringing to life soulless dead flesh, what kind of �life� is he therefore promising for the children of Israel, the physical immortality of cloned being perhaps? How reminiscent this is of the Egyptian process of mummification, a process which ancient Egyptians believed essential to preserve the physical body for the after-life. The Semitic peoples truly seem to be receivers of the same �God�.�
So, in summary, the Old Testament may well be a missive of reactionary response in threat and counter threat to a God that is not divine but a predatory agent of this Universe.
If one looks at things carefully in the ancient religious and historical texts, be they Abrahamic or Hindu, there is something totally illogical underlying the God, or Gods of all old testaments and their so called rational outlay. One characteristic that overlays many of this gods pronouncements is jealousy. �I am the Lord thy God and thou shalt not have strange Gods before me.�
It suggests something of huge import missing in the divine psychology - like subtlety. At the very least it implies a God with a very limited program. A boundary that makes this divine one a little restricted in size. It is ultimately foolish to reveal you are a jealous God because it betrays qualities of loveless shepherding, not very good if you want the best quality followers. It is at best a good management ethos for favourites and courtiers but suggests a massive inferiority complex. This God is a tester of loyalty and faith under the auspices of threatened murder as for instance described in the story of Abraham and Isaac, a duplicitous divinity acquiescing in deceit and theft in the stealing of Esau�s birthright. It all describes a megalomaniac form too with an all consuming vanity and a love of dissimulation and subterfuge to affect his will.
Whatever or whoever this �God� was there can be no doubt that this deity could not be regarded as one of all encompassing love. Again it begs the question. If there is no love, could there be such a phenomenon as God?
How can Men and Women of intelligence persist in believing the preposterous implications of a final directive entity, be it Grey alien in origin or not. If God is supposed to have given us a moral code to live by, as every major religion claims - a code designed to provide a route to the final acquisition of the God state, a code arbitrated on what is commonly termed "love", why have we been thrown into this Universe of parts, this entropic vestment, that in singular direction implicitly destroys the very meaning of love (addition to a whole), by subtracting and subverting the very platform of our existence with the Second Law Of Thermodynamics that makes an atom based Universe like ours rot into a cold nothingness going one way into increasing states of randomness and chaos with time.
Is the God state testing itself, in individually focused and deliberate terms, against the worst scenario possible in a stance opposite to itself? If the challenge is to see that all his "parts" are recoverable, no matter how far from himself he puts himself and his God state, then with human beings generally, if this is indeed a stage in his plan, he has proved himself to be a consummate failure. How then can such a state be God Almighty, a state of being that is all knowing, all loving, all the time.
The acceptance of a final personalised directive entity marks the believer to be self deceiving - at best - and untenable to reason, at worst. How often does one hear believers in a directive God forbid a deeper logical investigation into the phenomenon with the statement: "It is God�s will". "How dare us mere mortals question God's reasons for doing anything", is the implication, "How could such human paltriness know why God does things the way he does". It seems to me that such expedience may reasonably justify the idea of the Devil in the same way. Such stupefying idiocy may be used and has been used, as a justification for believing and doing absolutely anything. If there is no method of arbitration, any claim, anyhow, anyway, may be seen as a valid expression of behavioural sanction, for anything. Just how long does humanity proceed under such unmitigated stupidity.
When seen in the above contexts - it is easy to see why we all have, as a species, arrived at an inch from Armageddon. That inch is simply the distance an average finger has to move to have enough strength to push a single button, that one day might wipe out all reasoning life from this planet. It might well be argued that to get to that predicament - all reasoning life has already left this planet.
I am not saying there is no God. I do believe there has to be such a paradigm. But if logic has any meaning at all, what may be termed God as a finality in the sense we might accept it, has to surround the giver and the getter, the maker and the made in a wrapping of total Free Will both implicitly and explicitly. This most vital right to total freedom of expression must be inherent within any existential module, for the very confirmation of that existence. In other words, the final arbiter, or point of arbitration, can never be directive, denying any freedom of choice. This final arbiter, or Godhead, for want of any other word, must be an implicit effect that tacitly allows all things to BE from within any frame - from within any reality, in any way, form or direction. An incidental implicate phenomenon of utter perfection that resolves into being of itself and becomes uniquely existentially viable of itself as a singularity and thus allows all possibilities �to be� of themselves.
Entropy or the Second Law of Thermodynamics governs all that is physical and dictates increasing states of randomness and chaos with time. If you trace back the arrow of time to the point of the Big Bang you will arrive at a state of maximum order and harmony. This is the paradigm I call the �Godverse� it is a paradigm that is not physical and enforced as there is no separation of points to make for atoms or force. It is the state of existence that the great religious teachers called Heaven, a non-physical existence where no space or time exists. An existence where all things are possible and are made to exist in a reality within its frame of reference as cogent and real as ours, yet with an absolute freedom and thus all knowledge, a timeless knowledge that through its ultimate existential logic suggests permanent existence in a state of endless bliss and joy, permanent because Time begins with the Universe and the separation of an altogether state into parts.
I believe that our Universe comes out of a connection to this other state. Our Universe is an expression of the perfect freedom that is implicit to the timeless and limitless nature of the Godverse to explore all potentials including the potential to no longer be perfectly free. As an infinite state the Godverse is implicitly expressed into all finite states that lie between its own pole of absolute union and harmony and the leading edge of entropy - the pole of absolute chaos and separation. It is this implicit expression of the infinite into the finite that defines the zero point field of potentiality described by quantum physics. It also defines the living state itself, a state born out of a choice to experience the one thing that cannot be experienced from the state of perfect freedom � limit. In other words, if 'God' is all knowing then that knowing would have to include the knowledge of what it's like not to know all. Just as our Universe breaks things up in a one way momentum, the Godverse, its opposite, puts things back together again in a quantum single harmonious continuum. This assembling, unifying influence orders the naturally chaotic momentums of the Universe and makes order and therefore life, possible. Thus the Universe is a mixture of the principle of the Godverse within its opposite. All abstracts that move this Universe have their beginnings in the Godverse. Thus I believe that the concept of God is best described as that in which all absolutes are confined in absolute harmony. The ultimate value in being can then be expected to connect to this concept of God and thus anything that in any way subverts this value can be regarded as the ultimate catastrophe. All this of course beckons a non directive concept of the God principle. It quite clearly implies that there is something deeply contradictory about the natures of the God as described in the Old Testament and the one described through the teacher Jesus Christ in the New one. An argument that has raged for two millennia between scholars can never really be reconciled unless the two Gods are separated as different entities no matter how obsequious or convoluted the banter trying to mollify them as one and the same comes through.
Please don�t mistake this as a defence of Christianity and an attack on Judaism. Ironically it is often the Christians who defend the Old Testament God more powerfully than the Jews, despite its obvious contradictions to the words of the author of their faith. There is nothing more diametrically opposed than these two statements: �An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth� and �whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek turn to him the other also.�Why they do not spot this glaring contrast is beyond my understanding.
It is my proposition that the �chosen� people of the Old Testament happen to provide a very well documented case study of alien interception. They are by no means the only intercepted group but their story is one of the clearest and most well evidenced illustrations we have of an alien reach into humanity. The culmination of that reach based on a myriad of experimental groups worldwide is, I believe, the pale skinned Euro Caucasian as I explain in my previous article �The Horde� and expand on in my new book - �Grey Aliens and the Harvesting Of Souls�. I wrote this book and these articles under the premise that we can do nothing about any threat unless we first recognise its existence and then understand its nature. If those who we take to be �our Fathers� are truly �in spaceships� then perhaps it is time we searched again for our true lineage - perhaps this time beyond the banalities of a physical universe.
REFERENCES
1.Y Descent of Men: The Descent of Men � Steve Jones (Mariner Books 2005) p.99
2.The Song of the Greys � Nigel Kerner (Hodder & Stoughton 1998)
3.The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (Darton, Longman & Todd 1983) (Edited By James Charlesworth) APPENDIX TO 3 ENOCH CH 15 B.
4.The Old Testament Of The Bible: King James Version EXODUS CH. 39, V.2-3.
5.The Old Testament Of The Bible: King James Version LEVITICUS CH. 21.
6.The Old Testament Of The Bible: King james version EZEKIEL CH. 27.
(Charles E. Wharry) Darkbird18
Darkbird18 is back on point with one of my main research themes, “UFO’s” because there is something buried deep here and the truth is deep within this subject. FBI Agent Mullerd from the X-Files knew the truth about this subject even if X-Files was a TV show and Hollywood make believe but this is how they hide the truth by making a TV show about it…LOL! The Author Nigel Kerner, “Grey Aliens” books and articles is some of that truth that just happen to be out there in plain sight but it’s so unreal how in the world could it be true? The Great trick the Devil did was making us believe it doesn’t exist; the mind have more things to it then what they’re telling us and Nigel is opening up that part of our minds that is sleeping with his X-Files Grey Aliens works, so read on and wake up your mind……….
Unexplained Mysteries - Our fathers who art from spaceships
del.icio.us Tags: UFO
Technorati Tags: Grey Aliens
Thursday, October 16, 2014
America is Falling Into The An Illuminati Trap!
by Peter GoodgameOctober 2001
from RedMoonRising Website
The global propaganda arm of the New World Order is doing its job as expected. Osama bin Ladin has already been tried and convicted as the mastermind of the September 11 attacks. America will now become embroiled in a religious war that could engulf the entire Middle East. Who will gain from this war? What are some of the possible results?
- Osama bin-Ladin has now become the greatest Muslim hero. Don't believe the lies that the Western press is spreading that he is looked upon as a deviant and as an outcast by most Muslims. He embodies the fullest ideals of the concept of Jihad. It does not matter if he is responsible for the attacks or if he is not. He now stands in the battle against what Muslims refer to as The Great Satan, and 90% of Muslims can do nothing but admire him.
- The House of Saud is now in a Catch-22 situation. Do they support the American war and risk their kingdom being toppled, or do they try to keep their distance and acknowledge how illegitimate and shaky their government is? A very possible result of this war could be the fall of the House of Saud. They have been corrupted by American luxuries and true Muslims see the royal family as traitors to Islam. Standard Oil of California (now Chevron) bought the rights to prospect for oil in Arabia from the House of Saud for a mere $250,000 in 1933. America has viewed Saudi oil as our oil since that time, and we have always counted on our Saudi lackeys to always push for lower prices and higher production during every OPEC meeting. The House of Saud is an American asset and real Muslims view it as a terrible shame that their holiest land is controlled and supported by and even occupied with troops from, a "Christian" nation.
- The physical British Empire declined in the years after World War II, but the global elites, since the time of Cecil Rhodes, have understood this inevitable decline and have turned their attention to creating a brand new global empire. The Federal Reserve, the Council On Foreign Relations, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the Trilateral Commission, the World Trade Organization, etc, etc, are all a continuing part of this march towards a global government.
- Islamic Fundamentalism was supported by the British and American governments during the Cold War. Bin Ladin was a CIA and British asset. He personally fought against the Russians in Afghanistan and he was almost killed several times by Russian shelling. After the Cold War America slowly backed off of its support for Muslim fundamentalists, but certain members of the British elite have continued to support, and perhaps even direct it.
- Bin Ladin's direct financial assets and strategic capabilities have been hugely exaggerated. The entity known as Al-Qaeda is simply the guestbook for Muslims who entered Peshawar to join the jihad against Russia in Afghanistan. There is no such thing as a global terrorist organization known as Al-Qaeda! Bin-Laden is probably not directly, or even secondarily, responsible, but of course, the media is able to trot out "links" that "prove" Bin-Ladin was involved. These "links" may be real, but Afghanistan was a haven for many dedicated Muslims who wanted to participate in a jihad, and many of these rich and powerful fanatics crossed paths in that country over the past twenty years. These links are far from "proof" or even "evidence" that Bin-Ladin was responsible for orchestrating and funding the September 11 attacks.
-
- Destroying the ancient carved stone buddhist statues, which represented an attack on religious pluralism and tolerance.
- Prohibiting the growing of poppies for heroin.
This was perhaps one of the few admirable actions of the Taliban regime, but it deprived the merchant banks of a very important and massive supply of liquid capital. Drug money is used to prop up the bankrupt global financial system and the loss of the Afghani raw material represented a major loss of income. When Afghanistan is liberated will poppy production continue again under the UN? Of course, it will.
- Osama Bin-Ladin is a perfect scapegoat because he is already a well-known and admitted terrorist, he is connected with the House of Saud, he is associated with the Taliban and he is capable of starting a jihad among the majority of Muslims not corrupted and bought by the West.
- Religious war in the Middle East is a goal of the global elites for several purposes:
- War is always a quick road to peace. Want a League of Nations? Start World War I. Want a United Nations? Start World War II. Want a New World Order? Start a religious war in the Middle East.
- Jerusalem must become an international city, controlled by the UN, as a symbol of tolerance and as a holy place for the three monotheistic faiths.
- The Arabs must be kicked off the Temple Mount and a new Jewish Temple must be built, to be taken over for occult purposes.
- America's status as the only super-power must be dissolved.
America's strong grip on OPEC, through the Saudis, must be diminished. Europe has already made agreements for Russian oil, and so the fall of the House of Saud serves the NWO at the expense of America.
- Britain pledges to be our friend, and Tony Blair makes heartfelt speeches, but all of the alleged terrorists entered the United States via London, Saudi Arabian dissidents are given shelter in Britain, and the British-dominated New World Order can only gain from what will soon happen. In the meantime, the British press continues to be the most aggressive antagonist of Israeli self-preservation, and British elites have proven ties to Muslim terrorism. By the way, is there a CNN reporter that does not have a British accent? I thought CNN was an American network.
These are merely the thoughts I have gathered after pondering this subject. Below are some links to articles that offer important data that has been ignored or glossed over by the major media:
ILLUMINATI a myth? Full Documentary
10 Things the Elite Are Planning for You in the Next 4 Years (2013-2016)
Dr. Saad Al-Fagih:A dissident Saudi now living in London. He lived in Afghanistan, understands Saudi politics, and is quite frank in relating the Muslim view of Bin-Ladin. Here is an interview, and here is the website of his organization that seeks freedom and democracy in Saudi Arabia. Read especially the two main articles on the front page. Have you heard these views in our media? Don't you think that people like Dr. Al-Fagih should be heard?
Here is his statement of what Al Qaida really is:"Al Qaeda is just a record for the people who came to Peshawar and moved from there back and forth to the guest house. And moved back to their country. And if they want to follow the number, they must be talking about 20, 30 thousand people. Which is impossible to trace... That record, that documentation was called the record of Al Qaeda. So that was Al Qaeda. There's nothing sinister about Al Qaeda. It's not like an organization--like any other terrorist organization or any other underground group...Al Qaeda is just a record for the people who came to Peshawar and moved from there back and forth to the guest house. And moved back to their country. And if they want to follow the number, they must be talking about 20, 30 thousand people. Which is impossible to trace. And I think most of those records are in the hands of the Saudi government anyway, because people used the Saudi airlines, [at] a very much reduced fare.""Al Qaida" simply means "The Base."It was the base for Arabs who would sign up before entering Afghanistan. Please read Dr. Al Fagih's interview above. It was the base where Arabs would sign up so they could be tracked down if something happened to them in Afghanistan. There are twenty to thirty thousand names on the "roster" of Al Qaida, many of then are probably very prominent names of Saudi Arabians, and very few would even think of associating themselves with a terrorist organization. The Bush administration was frantic in their search for a label for Bin Ladin's group and the best they could do was "The Base." Pathetic.Here are some names for some very real terrorist organizations, and what they mean in English:
In a Wall Street Journal article titled "Saudi Arabian Royal Family Finds Itself Caught in the Middle of Two Alliances," Dr. Al Fagih is quoted as saying, "If the regime goes ahead and helps the Americans, it will abandon the last stroke linking it to Islam. People believe once there is Saudi help [to the U.S.], and the attack starts, it is totally justified to hit the regime itself."
The real action that could take place in the coming months might not be in the mountains of Afghanistan, but in countries like Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt, where the disenfranchised populations could very well revolt against their leaders who have been submitting to Western domination for decades. Democracy in the Middle East would be a disaster for the West, despite the fantasy that is disseminated by the mass media that America is the great defender of freedom.We have been propping up dictators in the Middle East since the 1930s and we fear what might happen were the Muslim masses able to exercise freedom and democracy. Perhaps this has been a strategy in the best interest of the West, and of the American people, but we should acknowledge what we are doing and dispense with the self-righteous hypocritical lies.
Website: Americans Against the Sauduction of Washington
Said K. Aburish:A Palestinian author and journalist also living in London. Here is an interview. His many books document the West's manipulation of the Middle East, and they offer a perspective that must be heard if the present situation is to be properly understood. And Americans stupidly wonder in horror and amazement, "How can they hate us so much?! What have we done to deserve this?!" Well, put down the clicker and read a book! Our foreign policy has been hijacked since Woodrow Wilson and we have been steadily aiming for our present destination for quite a long time. This should not be a surprise.
The Forbidden Knowledge: The Truth about the Illuminati, Religion, and Global Governance
Executive Intelligence Review:An organization led by the sometimes brilliant, sometimes ignorant, and sometimes comical, Lyndon LaRouche. One article on Osama Bin-London's globalist British backers, and another article on the globalist British control of international terror.
On January 11, 2000, EIR submitted a memorandum to Secretary of State Madeleine Albright requesting an official investigation into Great Britain's support of terrorism. This document puts forth the clear evidence that Great Britain has been a safe haven for known terrorists for many years. To this day groups like the Islamic Group (Egypt), Al-Jihad (Egypt), Hamas (Israel, Palestinian Authority), Armed Islamic Group (Algeria, France), Kurdish Workers Party (Turkey), and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (Sri Lanka) all continue to maintain official headquarters within Britain, and Britain has often bent over backwards diplomatically to protect known terrorists from the justice that was sought by countries such as Egypt, India and Yemen.According to EIR, the United States has every right, indeed the moral obligation to its citizens, to place Great Britain on the list of nations who we officially sanction as sponsors of terrorism.
According to EIR: ALL ROADS LEAD TO LONDONLondon's Bridge is Falling Down, a webpage that uncovers London's links with Islamic Jihad, Hamas and other terrorist organizations, while exploring reasons for the TWA flight 800 disaster.
Consider the article from a CBS news website entitled "Report: L.A. Target For Terror." Ahmed Ressam was a terrorist arrested in December of 1999 for plotting to bomb the LAX airport. Ressam admitted during his trial that he has close ties with a London resident, who is known to have close ties to Osama Bin Ladin.
A BBC article, "Algerian suspect 'trained hijackers'" records the arrest of an Algerian suspect named Lotfi Raissi. This man was a pilot and was allegedly involved in training at least four of the terrorists who struck on September 11. Raissi was re-arrested on an international warrant, along with three other suspects in the UK. Raissi was living in London near Heathrow International Airport at the time of his arrest.
A Guardian Observer article, "London-based terror chief plotted mayhem in Europe" speaks of how Djamel Beghal, the leader of a terror group that even Bin-Ladin admired, was based in London until September of last year. The article says, "US investigators now believe that the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon were planned in Germany using up to 30 people, with individuals who lived or once lived in Britain playing a crucial role."
The Guardian Observer also published an article on its website that documented links between two London-based banks and a Sudanese bank, that were involved in funding Bin-Ladin, but this article has disappeared.
Another article also documents Bin-Ladin's money supply, allegedly funneled through the Capital Trust Bank that is based in New York and London, a bank owned by Mohammad Hussein Al-Amoudi, whose lawyer is Vernon Jordan.
Esquire magazine published an exposé of Bin-Ladin in 1999, and they have re-posted it on their website. On the first page of this article it documents how Bin-Ladin was approached by the journalists interested in getting the interview,"That was the very reason I wanted to interview him, and the reason getting such an interview would not be a simple process. His public-relations apparatus is a sophisticated and complex network of agents and intermediaries. The first discussions took place in the old, ornate Jefferson Hotel in Washington. A couple of ABC News producers, Chris Isham and Len Tepper, brought me to meet with a trusted contact who had good connections among Islamic fundamentalists.Soon he sent word back: We would have to travel to London and meet with some of bin Laden's people. Bin Laden, it seems, has people all over. Two meetings, both in Tudor-style homes a half hour's drive from central London. We removed our shoes, drank cider and water, and made our intentions toward bin Laden known. We told his people we would raise the issues that concerned him, and "tell his side" and enough about his background so people would get a broader understanding of him."
A CNN article mentions a London associate of Bin-Ladin, who purchased and shipped to him a state of the art satellite telephone. His associate, Khaled al-Fawwaz, who was the recipient of the majority of calls from Bin-Ladin in Aghanistan, is now in custody in England.
The Christian Science Monitor published an article, on the intrigues surrounding England's Finsbury Park Mosque. Abu Hamza is the senior cleric of this north London mosque, and it held an "Islamic camp" during Christmas to train young British Muslims in "military training for brothers, self-development skills, martial arts, map reading, etc." Soon after, the Yemeni government arrested five Muslim youths who were in Yemen on British passports, on suspicion of plotting to commit terrorism. One of these youths was a step-son of Abu Hamza. Here is an article on Abu Hamza, his mosque and his group, and here is another article by the ADL.The latter article mentions that, "In addition to his sermons, Abu Hamza is believed to run weekend military training camps for Islamic youth in Britain that are staffed by former British army officers." Apparently, in a rather startling sequence of events, the President of Yemen asked the government of Britain to hand over Abu Hamza so that he could be tried as a terrorist in Yemen, but Britain refused. So who's fighting terrorism here!? Another article documents Abu Hamza's long-overdue arrest by Britain's crack "anti-terror squad" (no doubt!), but he was detained only for a few days and later released.
Osama Bin Ladin is a tool of the global elites who are being used to establish the New World Order. These global elites, also known affectionately as the Illuminati, are the rulers of the shadow governments of the United States and Britain. They are a collection of close-knit royal families, banking families, and political dynasties, with a major base of power being the city of London financial district, from where the major commodities of oil, gold, diamonds, weapons, and drugs are controlled and dispensed throughout the world.
These global elites have a vast intelligence network that operates through, over and above the American CIA, the British MI6 and the Israeli Mossad. They have been the major supporters of violent Islamic Fundamentalism from the very beginning, and they continue to manipulate these violent religious fanatics for their own ends.
The events of September 11 were engineered by these global elites, and to cover the rear ends they have betrayed their expendable asset, Osama Bin Ladin. They know everything about him, and all of the connections that he has all over the world, and they are very easily able to frame him for the terrible crimes they have orchestrated. Consider now the way in which our British "friends" are helping us to solve this crime:
(Does Britain have a history of betraying expendable agents? Here is one man's recent story.)
On Thursday, October 4, Tony Blair, in an address to Members of the British Parliament stated, "We have absolutely no doubt that Bin Laden and his network were responsible for the attacks." The British PM said that the evidence that had been collected was "overwhelming," but that a great deal of it could not be released because it might compromise the security of the agents who had gathered it ( Yeah, it wouldn't be prudent). The major media trotted right out with this shameless drivel through the BBC, The Washington Post, and CNN, among others.
On October 5, Time.com published a short report on Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the hijackers. Here is an excerpt,
These global elites have a vast intelligence network that operates through, over and above the American CIA, the British MI6 and the Israeli Mossad. They have been the major supporters of violent Islamic Fundamentalism from the very beginning, and they continue to manipulate these violent religious fanatics for their own ends.
The events of September 11 were engineered by these global elites, and to cover the rear ends they have betrayed their expendable asset, Osama Bin Ladin. They know everything about him, and all of the connections that he has all over the world, and they are very easily able to frame him for the terrible crimes they have orchestrated. Consider now the way in which our British "friends" are helping us to solve this crime:
(Does Britain have a history of betraying expendable agents? Here is one man's recent story.)
On Thursday, October 4, Tony Blair, in an address to Members of the British Parliament stated, "We have absolutely no doubt that Bin Laden and his network were responsible for the attacks." The British PM said that the evidence that had been collected was "overwhelming," but that a great deal of it could not be released because it might compromise the security of the agents who had gathered it ( Yeah, it wouldn't be prudent). The major media trotted right out with this shameless drivel through the BBC, The Washington Post, and CNN, among others.
On October 5, Time.com published a short report on Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the hijackers. Here is an excerpt,
"Britain on Thursday released a document setting out the basis for a case against Al Qaida for the September 11 attack, which indicates, among other things, that some of the hijackers had met with Al Qaida officials, and that Bin Laden had warned in the days before the attack that he was about to launch a major attack on America. The British document, based on telephone intercepts and information gleaned from interrogations in Europe since the attacks in New York and Washington, also reveals that orders were sent to a number of the network's key operatives to return to Afghanistan by September 10.
"Al Qaida's often diffuse structures are designed specifically to avoid leaving behind trails of command responsibility detectable to investigators probing specific attacks. Proving that Atta and others had spent time at Al Qaida camps in Afghanistan and had met with al-Zawahiri would therefore constitute a major breakthrough in the investigation."
So, on the one hand, we are told that Al Qaida is a shadowy paranoid group dedicated to preserving its anonymity, but on the other hand, we now have a "major breakthrough" by being able to link Atta with Al Qaida. Of course, all hard-core proof cannot be offered to the press because it would compromise the safety of agents. Here is an article that critically analyzes the 70-point "evidence document" that has been released by the British government indicting Bin Ladin and Al Qaida. The writer shows that only nine of these seventy points relate directly to the events of September 11 and that all of the evidence is weak and circumstantial. The document itself even begins with the disclaimer that,
"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama Bin Laden in a court of law. Intelligence often cannot be used evidentially, due both to the strict rules of admissibility and the need to protect the safety of sources. But on the basis of all the information available Her Majesty's Government is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document."
Not enough to convict in a court of law, but enough to render judgment and go to war?!
And why is the British government taking the lead in investigating an attack that occurred on American soil? Why do they suddenly appear to have all the evidence and all the answers, with a tear-jerking, supportive and noble speech of solidarity and brotherhood from Tony Blair to boot? Bin Ladin has always been an agent of British Intelligence. After America retaliated for the bombing of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania by launching cruise missiles at Bin Ladin's bases in Afghanistan he reassured Britain, through the London-based Al Quds Al Arabi daily newspaper, that he was "only interested in hitting the U.S. and Israel." Afterward, Bin Ladin's London-based spokesman, Omar Bakri, re-emphasized to the London-based Arabic daily Al Sharq Al Awsat, that "we have a covenant of peace with the British government." Well, for their betrayal the British must realize that Bin Ladin's covenant of peace with them has expired.
Yes, Bin Ladin was a British/NWO pawn, and his usefulness will be complete when he is punished for the September 11 atrocities.
And the true masterminds run free...
And why is the British government taking the lead in investigating an attack that occurred on American soil? Why do they suddenly appear to have all the evidence and all the answers, with a tear-jerking, supportive and noble speech of solidarity and brotherhood from Tony Blair to boot? Bin Ladin has always been an agent of British Intelligence. After America retaliated for the bombing of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania by launching cruise missiles at Bin Ladin's bases in Afghanistan he reassured Britain, through the London-based Al Quds Al Arabi daily newspaper, that he was "only interested in hitting the U.S. and Israel." Afterward, Bin Ladin's London-based spokesman, Omar Bakri, re-emphasized to the London-based Arabic daily Al Sharq Al Awsat, that "we have a covenant of peace with the British government." Well, for their betrayal the British must realize that Bin Ladin's covenant of peace with them has expired.
Yes, Bin Ladin was a British/NWO pawn, and his usefulness will be complete when he is punished for the September 11 atrocities.
And the true masterminds run free...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)