by James Corbett
October 18, 2020
from CorbettReport Website
by Official Account - Plandemic Documentary Series
August 18, 2020
from BitChute Website
Information sent by Don Ferguson
Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, 'Plandemic II: Indoctornation,' tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic.
David Martin is the creator of the world’s first quantitative public equity index - the CNBC IQ100.
He served as Chair of Economic Innovation for the UN-affiliated Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization and has served as an advisor to numerous Central Banks, global economic forums, the World Bank and International Finance Corporation, and national governments.
Dr. Martin has pioneered global programs to bring corporate and stock market transparency to multi-national extractive industries and has been instrumental in bringing the world’s largest white-collar criminals to justice.
https://plandemicseries.com/
Gravitas: Pfizer's abusive vaccine deals
1976 Swine Flu Fraud - CBS 60 Minutes
Omicron 'Shocker': It's Mostly Hitting The Vaxxed
Registered nurse Nicole Sirotek shares what she saw on the front lines in NYC
A 'Disturbing Uptick' in Cancers and Viral Disorders | CLIP
Billions Took The 666 Billions Took The 666 Mark But You Didn't, take COVID_ Vaccine
WATCH: Prof Dolores Cahill – ‘Everyone Who Has Had an mRNA Injection Will Die Within 3-5 Years’
Insider trading in the US Senate
The "failure" of US medical intelligence
The shut down of the US' pandemic early warning system in September 2019
The record numbers of CEOs quitting their jobs
The Federal Reserve's moves in the Repo market in September 2019,
...and several other signs that those in positions of power knew that 2020 was going to be the year of COVID.
But April seems like an eternity ago and many more pieces of suspiciously predictive activities been dug up in the meantime.
So, in the interest of continuing this exploration, let's examine 10 more signs of plandemic foreknowledge...
1) Crimson Contagion
In 2019 the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) held a pandemic exercise called Crimson Contagion, which, the mainstream press notes, was "eerily similar" to the current scamdemic...
The exercise scenario envisioned a novel strain of pandemic influenza originating in China and being brought back to the US by international tourists.
So why did the exercise make it into the mainstream press at all? Because of Orange Man Bad (Trump), of course.
More specifically, it provides the "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US" cover story for this neo-9/11, subtly reinforcing the narrative by suggesting that COVID-19 is a real and existential threat to the US and that the valiant leadership of the HHS tried to warn the White House about PPE shortages and other preparedness shortcomings.
Extra points if you recognize this drill from my coverage of it in COVID-911 - From Homeland Security to Biosecurity.
2) Canada's Pandemic Warning System Shut Down Right Before COVID-19
Canada's international alert system for disease outbreaks - the Global Public Health Intelligence Network, or GPHIN, which, The Globe and Mail helpfully inform us, is "highly regarded" - was "silenced" by the Canadian government in early 2019.
And we all know what happened at the end of 2019...
This story once again serves to bolster the mainstream narrative by portraying the novel coronavirus as a real and existential threat that could have been prevented if only the government had plowed more money into its public health department and paid more attention to the epidemiologists (who, as we have seen this year, never get anything wrong).
3) "Simulation" of the Deliberate Release of a Lethal Respiratory Pathogen Planned for 2020
The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board is a body convened by the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO) that seeks to,
"ensure preparedness for global health crises"...
In their 2019 "Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies," they warned, apropos of absolutely nothing, of the,
"very real threat of a rapidly moving, highly lethal pandemic of a respiratory pathogen killing 50 to 80 million people and wiping out nearly 5% of the world's economy."
They also set a number of goals for 2020, including:
The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
But don't worry, guys! That's just a "simulation," and we all know that drills never go live...
4) The WHO Warns of "New Normal" of Pandemic Outbreaks... in 2019
Last June, Dr. Michael Ryan - the executive director of the WHO's health emergencies program - told BBC News that,
"We are entering a very new phase of high impact epidemics and this isn't just Ebola."
In case you didn't get the warning, he added:
"This is a new normal, I don't expect the frequency of these events to reduce."
Look out, folks, we've got a regular Nostradamus here.
Dr. Ryan, it should be noted, is the same WHO official who announced that the "new normal" of the COVID-19 era involves governments forcibly removing those suspected of infection from their homes and separating them from their families.
Oddly, he forgot to mention that part when speaking to the BBC last year.
5) A Comic Book Published by the EU Envisioned 'A Global Pandemic Stopped by the EU'
This one has to be seen to be believed:
What you are looking at is a page from 'Infected,' a comic book published by the EU Publications Office in 2012...
No, you read that right:
A comic book published by the EU Publications Office...
And what's the story of this comic book adventure?
During a tour of a P4 biosecurity lab in China, a time traveler from the year 2111 arrives to warn the assembled scientists that, in the future, a pandemic will ravage the planet.
In order to prevent the calamity, the time traveler provides the scientists with a some vials of biological material that he says will be necessary to "nip any pandemic in the bud."
Terrorists try to steal the material *blah blah blah*, man scratched by a monkey *yadda yadda*, global infectious outbreak *etc., etc.*, and then... (you guessed it!)... the EU saves the day through an unprecedented global health campaign dubbed "The Way Forward."
Yes, luckily for humanity, the EU-led "one health" approach saved us all from this "new era" of zoonotic pandemic outbreaks that we have just entered...
Personally, if I were a citizen of the EU I'd be upset that some portion of my taxes go toward paying for the production of propaganda schlock like this.
After all, these are the same people who produced the dumbest propaganda video ever.
Oh, and just for the record, although the imaginary P4 lab in the comic is said to be in "Beijing," China's first (and only) P4 lab is in fact in Wuhan.
6) COVID-19 Test Kits Being Sold in 2017?
The World Bank runs a website called the World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) that tracks global trade data by product using their "Harmonized System" (HS) tracking codes.
On September 4, 2020, they posted data on COVID-19 test kits that raised some eyebrows. You see, the website indicated that these COVID-19 test kits were being sold as far back as 2017!
Proof positive that the whole thing was planned years in advance, right?
Sigh...
A cursory glance at the data would give even the most credulous truther pause for thought about the significance of this "find."
If we were to take this posting at face value, then we have to believe that not only were 58 separate countries producing and exporting these COVID-19 test kits (meaning that tens of thousands of people would have been involved in their production, sale, shipping and storage), but that countries like Switzerland were producing over 2,000,000 kg worth of these kits (valued at a cool $23 billion) without a single person anywhere in this supply chain asking,
"What's COVID-19, anyway?",
...and not a single person coming out afterward to say,
"You know, I thought it was odd that we were exporting billions of dollars worth of these COVID-19 test kits, but it was even weirder when COVID-19 was identified and named three years later"...
Or, you know, the test kits were general medical test kits that were relabeled for COVID-19 use in April of this year and retroactively relabeled in the WITS system.
Because that's exactly what the fact checkers are saying...
And you know what? I believe them. ("Oooooooh, I just knew James was a globalist shill!" jeers the crowd.)
The World Customs Organization even announced the reclassification in April of this year.
This is another example of how poorly researched information gets passed around online so that the fact-checkers can arrive on their white horses and save the day by dispelling the obvious misinformation (Gates and the God gene vaccine at the CIA, anyone?).
So I don't consider this one plandemic foreknowledge at all, but thought I would throw it in to put the debunking on record.
7) A White House Advisory Group published a report on 'How a Pandemic Would Ravage the Economy'... in September 2019
In September 2019 the White House's Council of Economic Advisors published a report on "Mitigating the Impact of Pandemic Influenza through Vaccine Innovation."
The report warned,
"the potentially large health and economic losses in the United States associated with influenza pandemics," estimating that such a pandemic would cause "from $413 billion to $3.79 trillion" worth of damage to the economy.
And, as the title suggests, it argues that,
"[n]ewer technologies, like cell-based or recombinant vaccines" could help drastically mitigate that damage...
Unsurprisingly, the usual MSM presstitutes used the story to reinforce the narrative that,
pandemic diseases are the new normal, that the US is woefully unprepared to fight the war on the invisible enemy, and that investment in novel vaccine technologies can help save the country from economic ruination...
8) Central Bank Gold Repatriation
You might remember back in 2013 when Germany's Bundesbank issued a remarkable statement announcing that they would repatriate 674 tons of their gold holdings from the New York FED.
You may even remember that they specifically set a 2020 deadline for that repatriation.
But did you know that Austria's central bank followed suit in 2015 with an announcement that they, too, would repatriate the country's gold by 2020?
And did you know that the Polish central bank repatriated 100 tonnes of its gold from the Bank of England's vaults in a series of secret airlifts ending in November 2019?
All of these pieces of evidence led analysts like Ronan Manly to predict that,
2020 would be the year of the great "system reset," a transformation of the world financial system that would ultimately be used to usher in a new international monetary order...
This has nothing to do with a pandemic, of course, but then again, neither does the financial crisis we're living through.
The truth is that the current financial meltdown has been gathering steam for years and was well underway for at least a year prior to any of this COVID-19 hysteria.
"Following the money" to track down the real perpetrators of this crime seems as good advice for would-be scamdemic investigators as it is for 9/11 investigators.
Conclusion
As you can see, there were many different warnings that a pandemic emergency was set to take place this year.
As you can also see,
there is no "smoking gun" that proves anything specific about COVID-19.
Even worse, many of these "warnings" actually serve to bolster the narrative that this scamdemic really is an 'emergency' - one that we could have prevented if only we'd thrown more money at Big Pharma and given more power to the public health technocrats.
But such is the nature of these large-scale events.
Amateur sleuthers get caught up searching for the single, undeniable "smoking gun" and lose sight of the bigger picture.
The bigger picture here is that - exactly as demonstrated in,
...the groundwork for the emergence of the biosecurity state has been carefully laid over the course of the past two decades (at least).
From the passage of emergency health legislation to the creation of new pandemic preparedness offices to the signing of international health treaties, this medical martial law infrastructure has ensured that - regardless of whether it is real or fake, planned or unplanned,
any public health crisis could be used as the trigger for the beginning of the biosecurity era...
By all means, keep looking for that smoking gun (and, if you happen to find it, let me know in the comments below).
But unless we discuss What No One is Saying about the Corona Crisis and address the root of this new biosecurity paradigm, the bioterrorists will get away with their scam...
by Beda M. Stadler
July 01, 2020
from Weltwoche Website
translated by Back to Reason
July 01, 2020
from Medium Website
The coronavirus is slowly retreating.
What actually happened in the past few weeks?
The experts have missed basic connections.
The immune response against the virus
is much stronger than we thought.
The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th.
The author, Beda M. Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist, and professor emeritus.
Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland, he also likes to use provoking language, which should not deter you from the extremely important points he makes.
This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally.
I am advocating for local measures according to local situations. And I advocate for looking at real data rather than abstract models.
I also suggest to read to the end, because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2.
Why Everyone was Wrong
The Coronavirus is Slowly Retreating
by Beda M Stadler
This is not an accusation, but a ruthless taking stock [of the current situation].
I could slap myself because I looked at Sars-CoV2- way too long with panic. I am also somewhat annoyed with many of my immunology colleagues who so far have left the discussion about COVID-19 to virologists and epidemiologists.
I feel it is time to criticize some of the main and completely wrong public statements about this virus.
Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.
But let's look at this one by one.
1. A new virus?
At the end of 2019 a coronavirus, which was considered novel, was detected in China.
When the gene sequence, i.e. the blueprint of this virus, was identified and was given a similar name to 2002 identified Sars, i.e. Sars-CoV-2, we should have already asked ourselves then how far [this virus] is related to other coronaviruses, which can make human beings sick.
But no, instead we discussed from which animal as part of a Chinese menu the virus might have sprung.
In the meantime, however, many more people believe the Chinese were so stupid as to release this virus upon themselves in their own country.
Now that we're talking about developing a vaccine against the virus, we suddenly see studies that show that this so-called novel virus is very strongly related to Sars-1 as well as other beta-coronaviruses which make us suffer every year in the form of colds.
Apart from the pure homologies in the sequence between the various coronaviruses which can make people sick, [scientists] currently working on identifying a number of areas of the virus in the same way as human immune cells identify them.
This is no longer about the genetic relationship, but about how our immune system sees this virus, i.e. which parts of other coronaviruses could potentially be used in a vaccine.
So:
Sars-Cov-2 isn't all that new, but merely a seasonal cold virus that mutated and disappears in summer, as all cold viruses do - which is what we're observing globally right now.
Flu viruses mutate significantly more, by the way, and nobody would ever claim that a new flu virus strain was completely novel.
Many veterinary doctors were therefore annoyed by this claim of novelty, as they have been vaccinating cats, dogs, pigs, and cows for years against coronaviruses.
2. The fairy tale of no immunity
From the World Health Organization (WHO) to every Facebook virologist (sic), everyone claimed this virus was particularly dangerous because there was no immunity against it because it was a novel virus.
Even Anthony Fauci, the most important advisor to the Trump administration noted at the beginning of every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it.
Tony and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US, because we worked in related fields back then. So for a while, I was pretty uncritical of his statements since he was a respected colleague of mine.
The penny dropped only when I realized that the first commercially available antibody test [for Sars-CoV-2] was put together from an old antibody test that was meant to detect Sars-1.
This kind of test evaluates if there are antibodies in someone's blood and if they came about through an early fight against the virus.
[Scientists] even extracted antibodies from a llama that would detect Sars-1, Sars-CoV-2, and even the Mers virus. It also became known that Sars-CoV-2 had a less significant impact in areas in China where Sars-1 had previously raged.
This is clear evidence urgently suggesting that our immune system considers Sars-1 and Sars-Cov-2 at least partially identical and that one virus could probably protect us from the other.
That's when I realized that the entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity, but in reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement. That wasn't science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone.
To this day there isn't a single antibody test that can describe all possible immunological situations, such as:
if someone is immune, since when, what the neutralizing antibodies are targeting and how many structures exist on other coronaviruses that can equally lead to immunity.
In mid-April, work was published by the group of Andreas Thiel at the Charité Berlin, a paper (Presence of SARS-CoV-2-reactive T-cells in COVID-19 patients and healthy donors) with 30 authors, amongst them the virologist Christian Drosten.
It showed that in 34 % of people in Berlin who had never been in contact with the Sars-CoV-2 virus showed nonetheless T-cell immunity against it (T-cell immunity is a different kind of immune reaction, see below).
This means that our T-cells, i.e. white blood cells, detect common structures appearing on Sars-CoV-2 and regular cold viruses and therefore combat both of them.
A study by John P.A. Ioannidis of Stanford University - according to the Einstein Foundation in Berlin one of the world's ten most cited scientists - showed that immunity against Sars-Cov-2, measured in the form of antibodies, is much higher than previously thought.
Ioannidis is certainly not a conspiracy theorist who just wants to swim against the stream; nonetheless, he is now being criticized because the antibody tests used were not extremely precise.
With that, his critics admit that they do not have such tests yet.
And aside, John P.A. Ioannidis is such a scientific heavyweight that all German virologists combined are a lightweight in comparison.
3. The failure of modelers
Epidemiologists also fell for the myth that there was no immunity in the population.
They also didn't want to believe that coronaviruses were seasonal cold viruses that would disappear in summer. Otherwise, their curve models would have looked differently.
When the initial worst-case scenarios didn't come true anywhere, some now still cling to models predicting a second wave.
Let's leave them their hopes:
I've never seen a scientific branch that manoeuvred itself so much into the offside.
I have also not yet understood why epidemiologists were so much more interested in the number of deaths, rather than in the numbers that could be saved.
4. Immunology of common sense
As an immunologist, I trust a biological model, namely that of the human organism, which has built a tried and tested, adaptive immune system.
At the end of February, driving home from the recording of [a Swiss political TV debate show], I mentioned to Daniel Koch [former head of the Swiss federal section "Communicable Diseases" of the Federal Office of Public Health] that I suspected,
there was a general immunity in the population against Sars-Cov-2.
He argued against my view.
I later defended him anyway, when he said that children were not a driving factor in the spread of the pandemic.
He suspected that children didn't have a receptor for the virus, which is of course nonsense.
Still, we had to admit that his observations were correct.
But the fact that every scientist attacked him afterward and asked for studies to prove his point, was somewhat ironic.
Nobody asked for studies to prove that people in certain at-risk groups were dying.
When the first statistics from China and later worldwide data showed the same trend, that is to say, that almost no children under ten years old got sick, everyone should have made the argument that children clearly have to be immune.
For every other disease that doesn't afflict a certain group of people, we would come to the conclusion that that group is immune.
When people are sadly dying in a retirement home, but in the same place other pensioners with the same risk factors are left entirely unharmed, we should also conclude that they were presumably immune.
But this common-sense seems to have eluded many, let's call them "immunity deniers" just for fun.
This new breed of deniers had to observe that the majority of people who tested positive for this virus, i.e. the virus was present in their throats, did not get sick.
The term "silent carriers" was conjured out of a hat and it was claimed that one could be sick without having symptoms. Wouldn't that be something!
If this principle from now on gets naturalised into the realm of medicine, health insurers would really have a problem, but also teachers whose students could now claim to have whatever disease to skip school, if at the end of the day one didn't need symptoms anymore to be sick.
The next joke that some virologists shared was,
the claim that those who were sick without symptoms could still spread the virus to other people.
The "healthy" sick would have so much of the virus in their throats that a normal conversation between two people would be enough for the "healthy one" to infect the other healthy one.
At this point we have to dissect what is happening here:
If a virus is growing anywhere in the body, also in the throat, it means that human cells decease.
When [human] cells decease, the immune system is alerted immediately and an infection is caused.
One of the five cardinal symptoms of infection is pain.
It is understandable that those afflicted by Covid-19 might not remember that initial scratchy throat and then go on to claim that they didn't have any symptoms just a few days ago.
But for doctors and virologists to twist this into a story of "healthy" sick people, which stokes panic and was often given as a reason for stricter lockdown measures, just shows how bad the joke really is.
At least the WHO didn't accept the claim of asymptomatic infections and even challenges this claim on its website.
Here a succinct and brief summary, especially for the immunity deniers, of how humans are attacked by germs and how we react to them:
If there are pathogenic viruses in our environment, then all humans - whether immune or not - are attacked by this virus.
If someone is immune, the battle with the virus begins.
First we try to prevent the virus from binding to our own cells with the help of antibodies. This normally works only partially, not all are blocked and some viruses will attach to the appropriate cells.
That doesn't need to lead to symptoms, but it's also not a disease. Because the second guard of the immune system is now called into action.
That's the above mentioned T-cells, white blood cells, which can determine from the outside in which other cells the virus is now hiding to multiply.
These cells, which are now incubating the virus, are searched throughout the entire body and killed by the T-cells until the last virus is dead.
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome.
The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left.
Correct:
Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
That's exactly what happened, when there was the global news, even shared by the WHO, that 200 Koreans who already went through Covid-19 were infected a second time and that there was therefore probably no immunity against this virus.
The explanation of what really happened and an apology came only later, when it was clear that the immune Koreans were perfectly healthy and only had a short battle with the virus. The crux was that the virus debris registered with the overly sensitive test and therefore came back as "positive".
It is likely that a large number of the daily reported infection numbers are purely due to viral debris.
The PCR test with its extreme sensitivity was initially perfect to find out where the virus could be. But this test can not identify whether the virus is still alive, i.e. still infectious.
Unfortunately, this also led some virologists to equate the strength of a test result with viral load, i.e. the amount of virus someone can breathe out. Luckily, our day care centers stayed open nonetheless.
Since German virologist missed that part, because, out of principle, they do not look at what other countries are doing, even if other countries' case numbers are falling more rapidly.
5. The problem with corona immunity
What does this all mean in real life?
The extremely long incubation time of two to 14 days - and reports of 22 to 27 days - should wake up any immunologist. As well as the claim that most patients would no longer secrete the virus after five days.
Both [claims] in turn actually lead to the conclusion that there is - sort of in the background - a base immunity that contorts the events, compared to an expected cycle [of a viral infection] - i.e. leads to a long incubation period and quick immunity.
This immunity also seems to be the problem for patients with a severe course of the disease.
Our antibody titre, i.e. the accuracy of our defence system, is reduced the older we get.
But also people with a bad diet or who are malnourished may have a weakened immune system, which is why this virus does not only reveal the medical problems of a country, but also social issues.
If an infected person does not have enough antibodies, i.e. a weak immune response, the virus slowly spreads out across the entire body.
Now that there are not enough antibodies, there is only the second, supporting leg of our immune response left:
The T-cells begin to attack the virus-infested cells all over the body.
This can lead to an exaggerated immune response, basically to a massive slaughter:
this is called a Cytokine Storm.
Very rarely this can also happen in small children, in that case called Kawasaki Syndrome.
This very rare occurrence in children was also used in our country to stoke panic. It's interesting, however, that this syndrome is very easily cured.
The [affected] children get antibodies from healthy blood donors, i.e. people who went through coronavirus colds...
This means that the hushed-up [supposedly non-existent] immunity in the population is in fact used therapeutically.
What now?
The virus is gone for now.
It will probably come back in winter, but it won't be a second wave, but just a cold.
Those young and healthy people who currently walk around with a mask on their faces would be better off wearing a helmet instead, because the risk of something falling on their head is greater than that of getting a serious case of Covid-19.
If we observe a significant rise in infections in 14 days [after the Swiss relaxed the lockdown], we'd at least know that one of the measures was useful.
Other than that I recommend reading John P.A. Ioannidis' latest work in which he describes the global situation based on data on May 1st 2020:
People below 65 years old make up only 0.6 to 2.6 % of all fatal Covid cases.
To get on top of the pandemic, we need a strategy merely concentrating on the protection of at-risk people over 65. If that's the opinion of a top expert, a second lockdown is simply a no-go.
On our way back to normal, it would be good for us citizens if a few scaremongers apologized.
Such as doctors who wanted a triage of over 80 year old Covid patients in order to stop ventilating them.
Also media that kept showing alarmist videos of Italian hospitals to illustrate a situation that as such didn't exist.
All politicians call for "testing, testing, testing" without even knowing what the test actually measures.
And the federal government for an app they'll never get to work and will warn me if someone near me is positive, even if they're not infectious.
In winter, when the flu and other colds make the rounds again, we can then go back to kissing each other a little less, and we should wash our hands even without a virus present.
And people who'll get sick nonetheless can then don their masks to show others what they have learned from this pandemic.
And if we still haven't learned to protect our at-risk groups, we'll have to wait for a 'vaccine' that will hopefully also be effective in at-risk people.
Excess Deaths in 2021 Point to Depopulation Agenda
Question– Why is mortality in Scotland higher in 2021 than 2020?
Answer– Because more people are dying. And the reason more people are dying is that more people have been vaccinated. In other words, there’s a link between rising mortality and the Covid-19 vaccine.
Question– You can’t prove that.
Answer– You’re right, I can’t. The evidence is all circumstantial. But it is compelling, all the same. For example, rising mortality isn’t just happening in Scotland. It’s happening in many of the countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. They’re all seeing a significant uptick in all-cause mortality. Why is that? What are they doing differently in 2021 than they did in the years before?
Question– I can see what you’re getting at, but I still don’t think you have enough evidence to make your case.
Answer– Okay, then you tell me: Why are more people dying in 2021 than 2020? And, keep in mind, all-cause mortality isn’t just up a bit; it’s smashing the five-year average. Check out this recent post from Alex Berenson at Substack:
Scotland is 87% adult vaccinated; weekly deaths are now 30% above normal
Oct 14, This is from the Public Health Scotland’s Covid-19 Daily Dashboard:
“The 315 excess deaths logged last week represents a 30% increase on the five-year pre-pandemic average for this time of year. This marks the 20th consecutive week with excess deaths above the five-year average and the highest since the week ending January 10, 2021.”
Even excluding Covid deaths they were almost 20% above normal for the most recent week, and the trend is rising.” (“Scotland is 87% adult vaccinated; weekly deaths are now 30% above normal”, Alex Berenson Substack)
Oct 14, This is from the Public Health Scotland’s Covid-19 Daily Dashboard:
“The 315 excess deaths logged last week represents a 30% increase on the five-year pre-pandemic average for this time of year. This marks the 20th consecutive week with excess deaths above the five-year average and the highest since the week ending January 10, 2021.”
Even excluding Covid deaths they were almost 20% above normal for the most recent week, and the trend is rising.” (“Scotland is 87% adult vaccinated; weekly deaths are now 30% above normal”, Alex Berenson Substack)
Question– But how can you build a case on data from just one country? It’s ridiculous.
Answer– But it’s not just Scotland. The same rule applies to many of the countries that launched vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. Here’s more from Berenson:
Add Germany – Europe’s most populous nation – to the countries seeing unusually high all-cause mortality that is NOT Covid-related.
In September, Germany reported almost 78,000 deaths, more than 10 percent higher than the expected figure, German government demographers said earlier this week.
Press: “Mortality figures (in Germany) in September, 2021: 10% above the median of previous years.” (“It’s not just the UK; all-cause deaths are also now running well above normal in Germany (80% adults fully vaccinated)”, Alex Berenson Substack)
And then there’s this is from Data Analyst’s Twitter account (check out the charts):
Data Analysis @Data_is_Louder
·
Oct 26
COVID mystery Denmark, Finland and Norway excess deaths are higher than in their worst Covid outbreak. These mysterious excess deaths happened in time conjunction with vaccination rollout.
Denmark ––“5 months is a row 2021 has broken the 10-year record of people dying from all causes…..Covid-19 deaths close to zero during the same period.”
The same is true in Ireland, UK and Israel. Take a look at England (Ages 10 to 59 years old.)
What’s so disturbing about this chart is that it shows how the vaccines target the young. “While the COVID death toll has been largely confined to the elderly… it’s the young who are bearing the brunt of vaccine injury. According to VigiAccess, the adverse event database for the World Health Organization, 41% of the more than 2.4 million vaccine injuries reported so far are among those under age 44, and just six percent are among people over age 75.” (“The real pandemic has just begun, and it’s COVID shot-induced heart attacks in the young”, Lifesite News)
That’s something you’re not going to read in the media, and for good reason, too. Because it would undermine their lethal objective to continue hyping the vaccine.
Here’s more from quantitative analyst Joel Smalley:
Weekly deaths update from the CDC. “Despite” being over 80% fully vaccinated, since 24-July, over 65s deaths in Florida are 14% higher than same period last year. “Despite” at least 50% full vaccination in the under 65s, deaths are up 46% and will rise as reporting catches up.
The examples are everywhere across the Internet. You don’t have to look very far. Wherever mass vaccinations took place, there, too, morality has risen. And–once again–these are not Covid deaths. These are mainly heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, circulatory diseases and neurological issues; the same vaccine-induced ailments we were warned about by the physicians and scientists who’ve been telling us the truth from the start. Turns out they were right after all.
Simply put, the vaccines are increasing fatalities, not reducing them. They are making matters worse not better. They are perpetuating the crisis not ending it.
And that is why the red line in the chart is pointing upward. It’s an indication that the death toll will continue to rise as long as we continue to do what we are doing now, inoculating millions of people with a cytotoxic pathogen that triggers blood clots, inflammation and autoimmunity. Here’s another chart of Scotland with a short comment from The Daily Skeptic:
“…. the presence of a Covid epidemic was not seen in summer 2020, but is seen in summer 2021. What differs between the two years? The glaringly obvious answer is the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination. There was no COVID-19 vaccination programme in 2020, but there was rollout of Covid vaccinations in a sequential way to increasingly younger age groups in 2021, a pattern that we see in the manifestation of excess deaths. …. The Yellow Card adverse events reporting system,…. has already recorded over 1,700 deaths in the U.K. population associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. There is therefore a prima facie case for COVID-19 vaccination being a contributing factor to the dramatic rise in summer excess deaths in Scotland in 2021.”
(“Are Vaccines Driving Excess Deaths in Scotland, a Professor of Biology Asks”, The Daily Skeptic)
Have you noticed how the media is trying to cover-up the sudden surge in mortality?
Here’s a good example from an article at the UK Telegraph:
“While focus remains firmly fixed on Covid-19, a second health crisis is quietly emerging in Britain. Since the beginning of July, there have been thousands of excess deaths that were not caused by coronavirus. According to health experts, this is highly unusual for the summer. Although excess deaths are expected during the winter months, when cold weather and seasonal infections combine to place pressure on the NHS, summer generally sees a lull.
This year is a worrying outlier.
According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), since July 2 there have been 9,619 excess deaths in England and Wales, of which 48 per cent (4,635) were not caused by Covid-19.
So if all these extra people are not dying from coronavirus, what is killing them?
Data from Public Health England (PHE) shows that during that period there were 2,103 extra death registrations with ischemic heart disease, 1,552 with heart failure, as well as an extra 760 deaths with cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and aneurysm and 3,915 with other circulatory diseases.” (“Thousands more people than usual are dying … but it’s not from Covid“, Telegraph)
So, according to the article, there were:
- 24% more heart failure deaths than baseline
- 19% ischaemic heart disease
- 16% cerebrovascular disease (strokes)
- 18% other circulatory diseases
All of these cerebrovascular, cardiac and circulatory ailments didn’t suddenly drop from the sky in 2021. They are vaccine-generated injuries. Can you see that?
And they are all linked to the spike protein, which is the “biological mechanism of action” that “damages blood vessels, organs, and causes blood clots, and that can kill a human being?” (Quote: Dr Peter McCullough)
Have you wondered why more people died this year of Covid than in all of 2020?
According to Johns Hopkins, Covid killed 353, 000 people in the United States in 2020. But in just 10 months in 2021, 390,000 people have died. How can that be? After all:
(Note: To read this full article click on this link: Excess Deaths in 2021 Point to Depopulation Agenda)
by Paul Levy
June 05, 2020
from AwakenInTheDream Website
For almost twenty years I've been writing about an invisible, contagious death-creating virus that no one is immune to that has been insidiously spreading and replicating itself throughout the human species.
This deadly disease is a virus of the mind - the Native Americans call it "Wetiko" - that literally cultivates and feeds on fear and separation.
The Anatomy of Covid-19
A psycho-spiritual illness, it is a psychosis in the true sense of the word, "a sickness of the spirit."
The origin and medium of operations of the Wetiko virus is none other than the human psyche.
This mind-virus acts itself out through our blind-spots in such a way so as to hide itself from being seen - keeping us in the dark, so to speak.
A collective psychosis, Wetiko can be envisioned as "the bug" in the system that has been ravaging our species for as long as anyone can remember.
It is a true game-changer to recognize that the coronavirus is literally a materialization in our world - a REVELATION - of the immaterial and heretofore invisible Wetiko virus that exists deep within the collective unconscious of humanity.
This is to say that what is playing out in the Covid-19 'pandemic' (with all the various political, social and financial reactions to it in our world, as well as what it brings up inside of our minds) can help us to begin to see the deeper underlying and more dangerous Wetiko 'pandemic' - a collective psychological infection - that has been plaguing humanity from time immemorial.
Wetiko is a unique form of mind-blindness that renders us blind to our blindness (i.e., we don't realize we are blind, but fancy ourselves as clear-seeing).
Pointing at Wetiko in its own unique way, The Gnostic Gospels says,
"The darkness comes to anesthetize the intelligence and spread the cancer of mind blindness."
Seeing how the Wetiko mind-virus surreptitiously works - both out in the world and especially within our own minds (which is the only place it can be confronted and potentially dissolved) - is its worst nightmare, for to see it takes away its raison d'etre, which is to perpetuate itself.
Seeing Wetiko simultaneously dispels its power over us while empowering ourselves.
This is why healing the "cancer of mind blindness" - and seeing Wetiko - is of such importance...
Covid-19 could potentially be the lens that helps us bring into focus and see Wetiko.
Multiple Vectors of Transmission
It is a limited and overly one-sided materialistic viewpoint which thinks that Covid-19 is solely a physical virus.
Having multiple facets of operation and channels of influence, the virus is multi-dimensional in its impact - it is affecting our world in practically every way imaginable. Besides its obvious physical aspect, Covid-19 also has a psychological vector of transmitting itself into our minds (via our unconscious reactions of fear, stress, anxiety, etc.).
The 'mental' vector of the virus spreads much more quickly, as it is exponentially more contagious than its biological counterpart, propagating itself through the channel of our shared unconscious blind-spots and fears.
In other words, the contagion of fear - the fuel for the Wetiko mind-virus that is being inflamed by Covid-19 - spreads faster than any physical virus is able to.
Like an entity with many tentacles, in addition to its physical and mental components, Covid-19 also has an interpersonal, behavioral vector of transmission. In other words, in affecting our minds (and thus, how we think and feel), Covid-19 impacts our behavior, which in turn influences how we interact with each other and the world around us.
This is to say that the virus deeply impacts the underlying social matrix that fashions human culture, leaving no stone unturned in its effects upon our world.
Like a multi-headed hydra, the virus has a countless legion of effects.
In addition to making people physically sick, some of whom die, the virus,
makes people afraid, creates enormous stress, changes governmental policies around the world, impacts the financial markets, inspires power grabs and profiteering from all sorts of unsavory people and institutions, feeds into and provides a pretext for totalitarian agendas, affects how often we leave our homes, influences what we think about, where we place our attention, what we wear when we go out in public, transforms the way we interact with each other and renders our future completely uncertain, in that it might either destroy our civilization or herald in a new historical epoch...
Covid-19 has so gotten into our heads that it has even intruded, in one form or another, into many people's dreams.
Recognizing that Covid-19 has multiple vectors of transmission opens up our vision to begin to see how - just like a symbol in a dream - the virus is revealing something deeper than itself.
Like Wetiko, Covid-19 is a field phenomenon, which is to say it doesn't exist as an isolated entity that independently exists on its own, walled off from the environment, but rather, it exists in relation to and as an expression of the field in which it arises.
When we get right down to it, the boundary between where the virus ends and the world begins becomes indistinguishable.
Even though on one level Covid-19 is a physical virus that has seemingly invaded our world, being a field phenomenon means that all of its myriad effects and repercussions throughout every area of our lives are not separate from the virus itself.
The virus has an energetic body that extends itself out into the world, and its effects in our world are its expression, the spore prints of its subtle body, so to speak.
The irony is that the effect of the virus' subtle body in our world are anything but subtle. Encoded within the physical pathogen are hidden catalysts that trigger us in ways that are beyond the merely physical.
In other words,
the virus triggers reactions within the human psyche to itself, reactions which are not separate from the virus but are part of the virus' "operational body" (i.e., how the virus surgically operates on us).
Just like the rays of the sun are not separate from the sun, but are its energetic expression, all of the virus' ripple effects into our world (and within our minds) are appendages of the virus' nonlocal energetic body that are continuous and co-extensive with the virus itself.
It greatly behooves us to step out of our dualistic mind-set, expand our limited and fragmented vision and see the actual true nature of the virus from a more wholistic perspective.
For example, if the moon's reflection appears in the ocean, the image of its reflection in the water can't be separated out from either the moon, the ocean or the mind that perceives the reflection - they are all part of one whole quantum system.
The moon isn't causing the reflection any more than the ocean (or our mind) is - all of these interrelated factors are interdependently reciprocally co-arising with each other so as to produce the resultant effect (the image of the moon's reflection in water that is arising within our minds).
To think of them as separate parts interacting with each other is a cognitive error preventing us from seeing the deeper whole system that is openly revealing itself through their shared interplay.
Or think of the ocean's waves - the ocean isn't in any way separate from its waves, the waves are its unmediated expression.
The ocean isn't causing the waves, the waves aren't the effect of the ocean - the waves ARE the ocean...
The myriad effects on our behavior that the virus has activated throughout human global society are based on our reactions - both conscious and unconscious - to its presence in our world.
Our reactions are, in turn, mediated through and shaped by the human psyche, which is the medium of operations for Wetiko.
This points to that the Wetiko mind-virus, at least in part, is influencing our reactions and hence, our behavior - both individually and collectively - to the physical virus.
Similar to how at the quantum level - which is to say at the reality level - mind and matter interpenetrate each other so fully as to reveal themselves to be indivisible, the physical virus and the psychological virus are not two separate things interacting, but are inseparable aspects of a greater whole unified quantum field in which mind and matter are one.
In other words, when we contemplate the biochemical, physical virus under the microscope of our mind from a whole systems point of view, it becomes impossible to differentiate the physical virus from the psychological virus, as they both reciprocally feed into and off of each other - it is thus impossible to tell where one ends and the other begins.
In in-forming and coordinating our unconscious reactions to Covid-19, the Wetiko mind-virus is like the stage manager behind the scenes, influencing our psychological state and thereby orchestrating our behavior from beneath our conscious awareness.
Cloaking itself under the cover of the global 'pandemic', the Wetiko mind-virus is then able to materially incarnate - taking on physical form - into our world by influencing our internal reactions to the physical virus.
The effects of the virus on our world can only be separated out from the virus in thought only, which is to say that the idea that the virus is separate from its effects is just that - an idea - with no basis in reality.
The idea that objects exist separate from their effects is an expression of the same unconscious conceptual blind-spot that spawns our sense of self that thinks it exists separate from others and the environment.
At the quantum level there is no difference between what something is (its being) and what effects it has (its doing), which is to essentially replace the world of material substances with a world populated by actions, events and inseparable processes in ever-flowing or constant movement.
To view the virus from a whole systems point of view is to recognize that the virus and its eco-system (which in our case happens to be the whole planet) are one seamlessly interconnected whole quantum system with no separable parts anywhere to be found.
This is to say that the virus and its myriad effects in our world and within our minds, when all seen together as interrelated aspects of a greater whole, are both literally and symbolically the revelation of something deeper.
This something deeper is the Wetiko mind-virus...
Topic of Topics
Imagine if we are somehow able to completely eradicate Covid-19 from the universe and life would return to "normal" and we would return to "business as usual."
We shouldn't be under any illusions... the world we lived in prior to the advent of the coronavirus 'pandemic' ("the good old days") was,
a world gone mad, riddled through and through by Wetiko psychosis.
It was just easier to deny this, as our madness had become normalized.
Wetiko had rendered us oblivious to our own madness, compelling us to act against our own best interests in a self-destructive way.
It was a world, due to our Wetiko-inspired madness, in which we were enacting collective suicide on a mass scale (for example, destroying the biosphere, the life support system of the planet), rushing as fast as we could towards our own self-destruction.
The emergence of the coronavirus into our world can be just another distraction from the deeper, more deadly Wetiko mind-virus that has forever plagued our species, or it could be recognized to be the very revelation of this mind-virus, finally exposing it to the disinfecting light of day.
How it actually manifests depends upon whether we recognize what it is potentially revealing to us or not...
It should get our attention that every person or group of people that have discovered Wetiko (by whatever name we call it) unanimously consider it to be the most important topic (it has been called "the topic of topics") - there's not even any competition - to understand in our world today.
Wetiko is at the very root of every crisis we face:
climate change (including our lack of response, our confusion around the topic and the hidden agendas attached to it)
the threat of nuclear war
social injustice
political malfeasance
financial corruption
endless war etc...
Called by many different names throughout history, the spirit of Wetiko renders every other issue secondary, for Wetiko is the over-arching umbrella that contains, subsumes, informs and underlies every form of self-and-other destruction that our species is acting out seemingly uncontrollably in our world today on every scale.
The less Wetiko is recognized, however, the more seemingly powerful, and dangerous it becomes.
If we don't come to terms with what Wetiko is revealing to us, however, nothing else will matter, as there will be no more human species.
Both the coronavirus and the Wetiko virus share a similar evil genius as far as how they covertly operate.
Just like a physical virus isn't really alive by itself, but needs to hijack and colonize living cells to replicate itself in order to take on a semblance of life, the same is true for the Wetiko mind-virus.
Wetiko, like a vampire, can't live on its own vital force, for it has none.
Instead, it takes on a seeming life of its own through feeding on the fear and sense of separation it elicits in people.
Once someone falls under Wetiko's deadly spell, they become the unwitting purveyors of this virus of the mind to the world.
In his recent article, "Searching for the Anti-Virus - Covid-19 as Quantum Phenomenon," Martin Winiecki writes,
"Wetiko - often referred to as a mind virus - propagates the deep-seated illusion of seeing oneself desperately confined to the cage of a separated ego.
From this perspective of isolation, others appear either as competitors or as prey.
In a worldview in which fear is the basic condition, fight and exploitation seem rational, empathy ridiculous and sentimental...
Wetiko has numbed our hearts, blurring our ability to perceive both the sacredness and the pain of life, both outside and inside ourselves.
Innumerable beings are perishing due to this chronic inability to feel empathy."
On one level our common enemy is Covid-19, but on a deeper level our shared adversary is our unconscious ignorance of our inter-connectedness with each other.
It is this very ignorance and the fear that accompanies the physical virus that is the food for the Wetiko mind virus...
ME Disease
Before finding the name Wetiko, I had been tracking this seeming entity and realized it was a self-perpetuating aberration of the human ego, so I called it "Malignant Egophrenia" (a.k.a., "ME disease").
The essence of ME disease is to mistakenly identify with a fictitious identity, a false version or imposter of ourselves, through which we become an impersonator of our true self (this is why Wetiko is referred to as "the counterfeiting spirit" in The Apocryphal texts of The Bible).
If we fall under the thrall of Wetiko/ME disease, we unconsciously use the creative genius of our own mind to imprison ourselves into a limited, constricted identity in which we think - and compulsively recreate and endlessly reinforce the illusion - that we exist as a "separate self" that is alien to the rest of the universe.
We then grasp onto this false identity, defending it at all costs, and yet, this "self" that we are protecting doesn't even exist in the way we've been imagining it does.
In essence, we are then investing - and wasting - our life force in contracting against and obstructing our own light due to something that has no actual existence except in our imagination.
This is simultaneously the cause and the effect of Wetiko psychosis...
In this "self"-created and endlessly self-perpetuating process - which is both an expression of and results in not knowing who we truly are - we then try to find answers to our self-created problems that are the result of our disoriented viewpoint by looking outside of ourselves.
This takes us away from both the source and solution of the problem, which is within ourselves.
When this plays out not only within the individual but collectively as a species, the whole thing becomes madness on an industrial scale, as we see evidence all around us in the world today.
The whole benighted project(ion) is not just sponsored by Wetiko, it is the revelation of Wetiko for those who have eyes to see.
I first learned about the word Wetiko from Professor and indigenous author Jack Forbes in his classic book on Wetiko called Columbus and other Cannibals.
Forbes writes,
"For several thousands of years human beings have suffered from a plague, a disease worse than leprosy, a sickness worse than malaria, a malady much more terrible than smallpox...
Tragically, the history of the world for the past 2,000 years is, in great part, the story of the epidemiology of the Wetiko disease...
This disease is the greatest epidemic sickness known to man."
In his foreword to Forbes' book, author and environmental activist Derrick Jensen asks the question,
"Why is the dominant culture so excruciatingly, relentlessly, insanely, genocidally, ecocidally, suicidally destructive?"
Oftentimes, the most important thing is to ask the right question.
Make no mistake, Jensen's question is the right question.
The idea of Wetiko helps us get a handle on how to answer it.
The idea of Wetiko - with its new way of envisioning what is happening in our world - has a real benefit and utility, helping us wrap our minds around the current madness that is overtaking our planet.
Wetiko can be conceived of as being an evil, cannibalistic, vampiric spirit that inspires people under its sway to take and consume another's resources and life-force energy solely for their own profit, without giving anything back of value from their own lives.
Wetiko thus violates the sacred law of reciprocity in both human affairs and the natural world as a whole.
Forbes refers to Wetiko as "the sickness of exploitation."
When people are infected with the Wetiko-mind virus, instead of entering into a relationship and sacred partnership with the world, they think of the world as an object separate from themselves to be used and exploited for their own benefit, a perspective that simultaneously turns them into objects as well.
This results in them losing awareness of their inter-connectedness with the web of life.
To quote Alnoor Ladha and Martin Kirk from their article called 'Seeing Wetiko - On Capitalism, Mind Viruses, and Antidotes for a World in Transition,
"Wetiko short-circuits the individual's ability to see itself as an enmeshed and interdependent part of a balanced environment and raises the self-serving ego to supremacy."
It is thus particularly dangerous when those who are taken over by Wetiko are in positions of power...
To quote Forbes,
"if we continue to allow the wetikos to define reality in their insane way we will never be able to resist or curtail the disease."
To finish reading this article click on this link: " COVID-19 is a symbol of a more Deeper Infection- The Wetiko Mind Virus."
New evidence strongly suggests COVID is natural, not from a lab leak
Although most scientists have compelling reasons to favor a natural origin for SARS-CoV-2, a few prominent biologists have suggested a lab-leak origin for the pandemic.
No definitive origin has yet been found, but the discovery of three new strains of coronavirus in bats in Laos strongly suggests a natural, not lab-leak, origin for the disease.
While it's not yet possible to rule out the idea of a lab leak entirely, the latest clues strongly point to a natural origin as the most likely scenario.
For approximately the past two years, humanity has suffered beneath the heel of a simple but world-changing organism: the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Since its emergence in humans late in 2019, this virus, and the disease it causes in humans, COVID-19, has ravaged the globe, leading to hundreds of millions of infections, tens of millions of those suffering long-term effects, and millions of deaths.
In addition, human society itself has seen dramatic and polarizing changes. Scientifically, we know that the most effective public health interventions include:
- avoiding large, crowded, indoor gatherings,
- wearing a face mask that covers your nose and mouth,
- maintaining at least 6 feet (2 meters) of the distance between yourself and those who aren’t members of your household,
- minimizing your contact time with those outside your household,
- giving people the resources they need to stay safely at home when infection rates soar,
- and fully vaccinating your body against the virus.
However, one question has preoccupied the minds of many: where did SARS-CoV-2 come from? This novel coronavirus is unlike any other, and this one question has led to two main ideas. One is that the virus occurred naturally and spilled over into humans from human-animal contact. The other is that the virus first emerged in humans from a lab leak, originating from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As 2021 reaches its end, here’s what we know so far about COVID-19’s origins.
The natural origin hypothesis
For decades, humans have been studying how pandemics occur, with an eye towards prevention and countermeasures. Many different fields come together in this endeavor, including virology, immunology, epidemiology, disease ecology, and evolutionary biology, as each set of experts brings their own unique knowledge set. Although it’s oversimplifying matters quite a bit, the basic recipe for pandemic origins goes as follows.
- Human civilization, particularly over the past century, expands into previously wild territories.
- Habitat loss due to climate change and deforestation increases the potential for novel human-animal and animal-animal contact.
- In addition, humans regularly contact animals through industrialized animal agriculture, animal markets (both legal and illegal), and the fur trade.
- As a result, diseases that were previously only circulating in certain animals now have the potential to jump hosts: from animal to animal, from animal to human, or even from human to animal.
- With each new infection and each new host, the disease has a chance to further mutate and adapt, leading to novel strains, new infections, and — in the worst case — a highly infectious, deadly disease in humans.
That pathway has been the basic recipe for all prior pandemics over the last century, from swine flu to bird flu to SARS to MERS to HIV/AIDS. When it comes to SARS-CoV-2 and the disease it causes in humans, COVID-19, this is the default hypothesis of the overwhelming majority of experts in the field.
The lab-leak hypothesis
On the other hand, there’s another option that a few scientists — along with a great many non-scientists — have been entertaining: that the disease spilled over into humans not from a natural event, but rather from a lab leak originating from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Wuhan, where COVID-19 in humans is believed to have originated in late 2019, is the largest city around for many hundreds of miles, and a hub of industrial and commercial activity. Wuhan is the largest city not only in its province, Hubei but in all of central China. Surrounded by large rural and borderline-wild areas, many novel viruses have been found in the animals in those regions. As a result, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, one of the top virological institutes in the world, was built in precisely this location.
A few pieces of evidence — circumstantial, sure, but compelling to many — didn’t sit right with a number of people.
- Dr. Zhengli Shi, the chief scientist for emerging disease at WIV, performs research on bat viruses, some of which are incredibly similar to SARS-CoV-2.
- Many of the animals, and the viruses that they carry, are known to exist in that lab, and not all of the viruses collected have even been genetically sequenced.
- It’s possible to genetically engineer or modify viruses, and there are some peculiar features present in SARS-CoV-2 that it may be possible to create in a lab, not only via random evolution in the wild.
- And that China is well-known for covering up any information that could make them look imperfect in any way.
When you take, all together, the preceding facts, you too might consider that perhaps the current pandemic owes its origins not to a natural disease spillover from human-animal contact, but from a mistake, or even a deliberate action, arising from the Wuhan Institute for Virology. To read the full article click on this link: New evidence strongly suggests COVID is natural, not from a lab leak
Dr. John Littell, a family practice doctor, has taken a controversial stand while championing medications such as Ivermectin in the fight against Covid.
Dr. John Littell
Visit this page Pandemic Health to view the video about how Ivermectin can be used to treat COVID.
Akashic Times
A Pfizer vaccine data leak has exposed the dangerous side effects associated with taking the jab.
The leak comes after the FDA agreed to withhold the Pfizer documents for 75 years.
However, despite receiving FDA approval to withhold the vaccine data for 75 years, it has since been confirmed that the Pfizer vaccine reports were leaked anyway.
The document was leaked due to a cyberattack on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website. More than 40 megabytes of classified information from the agency’s review were published on the dark web, and several journalists were sent copies of the leak by anonymous senders.
They came from anonymous email accounts and most efforts to interact with the senders were unsuccessful.
The Akashic Times have since reviewed the documents, which proved to be shocking due to the number of side effects that are now officially associated with the vaccine.
Organizations such as the NHS and the government state that vaccines are safe and effective.
Those that previously reported vaccine-related injuries via the Yellow Card scheme were often accused of making false correlations or imagining their symptoms.
However, the Pfizer document paints a very different picture. It listed thousands of side effects that occurred at an alarming rate which were a direct result of taking the vaccine.
These vaccine side effects included non-fatal conditions such as eczema, blisters, asthma, low sperm counts, and fertility problems.
Other more serious side effects included but were not limited to auto-immune disorders, blindness, diabetes, herpes, and heart problems such as myocarditis.
The Pfizer vaccine also includes thyroid disorders, and neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis, seizures, epilepsy, narcolepsy, and Zika-virus-associated Guillain Barre Syndrome.
It is important to note that every single one of these side effects was listed by Pfizer themselves which you can read in the hyperlinks above or here.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to include all of the side effects here simply because it would run into dozens of pages.
However, what we do know is that the Pfizer vaccine is also associated with inflammatory bowel disease, relapsing diseases, pregnancy complications, deafness, and even tongue biting!
While the vaccine has been approved for use in pregnant women, it is known to cause pregnancy complications.
For example, one of the many pregnancy-complication issues it causes is the anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy, or ASP for short. ASP is a fatal disease and among the leading cause of maternal mortality.
Symptoms include anxiety, confusion, shortness of breath, severe bleeding, and death. It can be difficult to diagnose because the symptoms may not always be present.
Therefore, there is an element of risk for pregnant women taking the Pfizer vaccine.
Other conditions listed in the Pfizer document are various blood disorders, Crohn’s disease, and liver failure. Blood clotting was another issue reported from the vaccine.
However, one of the most telling side effects of this covid-19 vaccine is….covid-19.
Proponents of the vaccine often argue that despite the possible side effects associated with some of the vaccines, it prevents people from dying from covid-19.
The problem is that the vaccine actually causes people to contract covid-19. In other words, it is contributing to the number of cases. It also lists covid-19 associated Pneumonia as a side effect. You can read the side effects for yourself from page 30 onwards in the document.
Some may argue that all of these side effects are only associated with one vaccine.
However, vaccine injuries have been present and publicly acknowledged with all of the vaccines.
Research developed by Edinburgh University showed that almost 350 Brits have been struck down with a separate rare clotting disorder after getting the AstraZeneca vaccine.
The condition can cause minor bruising around the body and can leave some with a purple-dotted rash.
The Moderna vaccine has been associated with heart problems such as myocarditis and pericarditis. It also includes inflammation, fainting, and breathing difficulties.
Data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has also revealed that both covid-19 deaths and cases were worse in vaccinated people, particularly those over the age of 18.
The table below from UKHSA highlights the differences in cases between the unvaccinated, and those that have had one or more jabs.
Akashic Times is the UK’s only online, fully independent not-for-profit newspaper that brings you real news from across the globe.
CDC Aware of Hundreds of Safety Signals for COVID Jab
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- In September 2022, The Epoch Times asked the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to release its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) data mining results. The CDC refused. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request has now forced the release of these data, and they are stunning
- The CDC’s PRR monitoring has identified several hundred safety signals, including for Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and death. In individuals aged 18 and older, there are 770 safety signals for different adverse events, and more than 500 of them have a stronger safety signal than myocarditis and pericarditis
- In the 12- to 17-year-old age group there are 96 safety signals, and in the 5- to 11-year-old group there are 66, including myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease and vitiligo
- The proportions of deaths, which were only provided for the 18-plus age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs compared to 4.7% for all other vaccines
- The FDA is also required to perform safety monitoring, using empirical Bayesian data mining. The Epoch Times asked the FDA to release its monitoring results in July 2022 but, like the CDC, the FDA refused, only to admit in December 2022 they’d confirmed the Pfizer shot was linked to pulmonary embolism
CDC under fire for allegedly withholding COVID-19 data
In September 2022, The Epoch Times asked the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to release its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) data mining results. PRR1 measures how common an adverse event is for a specific drug compared to all the other drugs in the database.
According to the standard operating procedures2,3 for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is run jointly by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to perform these data mining analyses.
Not only did the CDC refuse to release the data, but it also provided false information — twice — in response to The Epoch Times' questions about the monitoring being performed. As reported by The Epoch Times back in September 2022,4 the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses were "outside the agency's purview" and that no monitoring was being done by them.
Eventually, the agency admitted it was doing PRRs, starting in February 2021, only to later claim they didn't perform any PRRs until March 2022. The Epoch Times also cited several papers in which the FDA and/or CDC claimed their data mining efforts had come up empty handed.5 Now, we find that was all a pack of lies.
CDC Monitoring Reveals Hundreds of Safety Signals
In reality, the CDC's PRR monitoring reveals HUNDREDS of safety signals, including Bell's palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and death — all of which, according to the rules, require thorough investigation to either confirm or rule out a possible link to the shots. As reported by The Epoch Times in early January 2023:6
"The CDC analysis was conducted on adverse events reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022. The Epoch Times obtained the results through a Freedom of Information Act request after the CDC refused to make the results public …
PRR involves comparing the incidence of a specific adverse event after a specific vaccine to the incidence after all other vaccines. A signal is triggered when three thresholds are met, according to the CDC: a PRR of at least 2, a chi-squared statistic of at least 4, and three or more cases of the event following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared tests are a form of statistical analysis used to examine data.
The results obtained by The Epoch Times show that there are hundreds of adverse events (AEs) that meet the definition, including serious conditions such as blood clotting in the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a lack of oxygen to the heart, and even death. The high numbers, particularly the chi-squared figures, concerned experts.
For many of the events, 'the chi-squared is so high that, from a Bayesian perspective, the probability that the true rate of the AE of the COVID vaccines is not higher than that of the non-COVID vaccines is essentially zero,' Norman Fenton, a professor of risk management at Queen Mary University of London, told The Epoch Times in an email after running the numbers through a Bayesian model that provides probabilities based on available information."
Myopericarditis Is Far From the Only Problem
One of the few side effects of the COVID jabs that the CDC has actually acknowledged is myocarditis (heart inflammation), and a related condition called pericarditis (inflammation of the heart sack). Alas, the PRR monitoring results reveal there are more than 500 other adverse events that have stronger warning signals than either of those conditions.
Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor trained in statistics at Princeton University told The Epoch Times:7
"We know that the signal for myocarditis is associated with something that is caused by the mRNA vaccines, so it's more than reasonable to say that anything with a signal larger than myocarditis/pericarditis should be taken seriously and investigated."
Guetzkow expanded on his commentary in a January 4, 2023, Substack article.8 Below is a summary list of some of the key findings from the CDC's PRR analysis. Guetzkow goes deeper in his article, so for more details, I suggest reading it in its entirety.
For even more analyses and commentary, see Fenton's Substack article, "The CDC's Data on COVID Vaccine Safety Signals."9 If you want to investigate the PRR data for yourself, you can download them from The Epoch Times' January 3, 2023, article.10 You can also find them here.11
In individuals aged 18 and older, there are safety signals for 770 different adverse events, and two-thirds of them (more than 500) have a stronger safety signal than myocarditis and pericarditis. Of those 770 signals, 12 are brand-new conditions that have not been reported following other vaccines. Topping the list of safety signals are cardiovascular conditions, followed by neurological conditions. In third and fourth place are thromboembolic conditions and pulmonary conditions. Death is sixth on the list and cancer is 11th. Considering the uptick we've seen in aggressive cancers, the fact that death tops cancer really says something. |
The number of serious adverse events reported between mid-December 2020 and the end of July 2022 (just over 19 months) for the COVID jabs is 5.5 times greater than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the U.S. over the last 13 years (approximately 73,000 versus 13,000). |
Twice as many COVID jab reports were classified as serious compared to all other vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%), which meets the definition of a safety signal. |
The proportions of reported deaths, which was only provided for the 18+ age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs compared to 4.7% for all other vaccines. As noted by Fenton,12 "If the CDC wish [sic] to claim that the probability a COVID vaccine adverse event results in death is not significantly higher than that of other vaccines the onus is on them to come up with some other causal explanation for this difference." |
In the 12- to 17-year-old age group, there are 96 safety signals, including myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell's Palsy, genital ulcerations, high blood pressure, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetency, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia, thrombosis, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest pain and increased troponin levels (indicative of heart damage). |
In the 5- to 11-year-old group, there are 66 safety signals, including myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki's disease, menstrual irregularities and vitiligo. |
It's worth noting that the CDC didn't perform its first safety signal analysis until March 25, 2022 — 15 months after the shots were rolled out. Why the long wait — especially since the CDC had announced it would begin monitoring in early 2021? Just consider, for a moment, how many lives have been lost because the CDC failed to properly monitor safety, and still drags its feet when it comes to warning people about the risks involved.
FDA Still Refuses to Share Safety Data
The FDA is also required to perform safety monitoring using another technique called Empirical Bayesian data mining. The Epoch Times first asked the FDA to release its monitoring results back in July 2022,13,14 but like the CDC, the FDA refused and insisted the data showed no evidence of serious adverse effects. In other words, "Just trust us. We're experts."
According to the FDA, the only potential signal they'd found through April 16, 2021, was for raised body temperature.15 Then, in mid-December 2022 — just four months after The Epoch Times tried to get these data — the FDA announced that pulmonary embolism (blood clots that block blood flow in the lungs) had met the threshold for a statistical signal, and continued to meet the criteria after in-depth evaluation, but it was only linked to the Pfizer jab.16
As noted by The Epoch Times,17 pulmonary embolism is also identified as a signal in the CDC's PRR analysis for individuals as young as 12, which really ought to strengthen concerns.
The FDA also admitted it had already evaluated three other warning signals: lack of oxygen to the heart, immune thrombocytopenia (a blood platelet disorder) and intravascular coagulation (a type of blood clotting), but none of these continued to meet the threshold after analysis.
If the FDA was evaluating four warning signals, why did they tell The Epoch Times there was no evidence of ill effects, and why did they claim the only potential signal they'd found was slight fever? Are we to believe they discovered these signals after The Epoch Times asked for the monitoring results and then completed four in-depth investigations in four months?
Whatever the truth, it's clear that both the CDC and FDA are not being transparent. Worse, they've hidden data, knowing it could mean the difference between life and death for hundreds of thousands of people.
CDC Has Ignored Clear 'Death' Signal
The CDC ignoring a clear signal for death is probably the most egregious example of its failures as a public health institution. As early as July 2021, Matthew Crawford published a three-part series18,19,20 detailing how the CDC was hiding safety signals by using a flawed formula. In August that year, Steve Kirsch informed the agency of these problems, but was ignored.
Then, in an October 3, 2022, article,21 Kirsch went on to show how "death" should have triggered a signal even when using the CDC's flawed formula (which is described in its VAERS standard operating procedures manual22). Here's an excerpt:23
"The formula the CDC uses for generating safety signals is fundamentally flawed; a 'bad' vaccine with lots of adverse events will 'mask' large numbers of important safety signals … Let me summarize the key points for you in a nutshell: PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is defined on page 16 in the CDC document24 as follows …
A 'safety signal' is defined on page 16 in the CDC document as a PRR of at least 2, chi-squared statistic of at least 4, and 3 or more cases of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the specific vaccine of interest. This is the famous 'and clause.' Here it is from the document:
Only someone who is incompetent or is deliberately trying to make the vaccines look safe would use the word 'and' in the definition of a safety signal.
Using 'and' means that if any one of the conditions isn't satisfied, no safety signal will be generated. As noted below, the PRR will rarely trigger which virtually guarantees that most events generated by an unsafe vaccine will never get flagged.
The PRR value for the COVID vaccines will rarely exceed 1 because there are so many adverse events from the COVID vaccine because it is so dangerous (i.e., B in the formula is a huge number) so the numerator is always near zero. Hence, the 'safety signal' is rarely triggered because the vaccine is so dangerous."
A Fictitious Example
Using a fictitious vaccine as the example, Kirsch explained how an exceptionally dangerous vaccine will fly under the radar and not get flagged, thanks to this flawed formula:25
"Suppose we have the world's most dangerous vaccine that causes adverse events in everyone who gets it and generates 25,000 different adverse events, and each adverse event has 1,000 instances.
That means that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is just 40 events per million reported events. Now let's look at actuals for something like deaths. For all other vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million adverse events total.
Since 40 per million is less than 6,200 deaths per million, we are not even close to generating a safety signal for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 people in a year … The point is that a dangerous vaccine can look very 'safe' using the PRR formula."
Calculating Death Signal for the COVID Jab
Next, Kirsch calculates the PRR for death for the COVID jab — using VAERS data and the CDC's definitions and formula. As of December 31, 2019, there were 6,157 deaths and 918,717 adverse events total for all vaccines other than the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there were 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million adverse events total for the COVID jabs. Here's the formula as explained by Kirsch:26
"PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of 2. In other words, the COVID vaccine is so deadly that even with all the adverse events generated by the vaccine, the death signal did not get drowned out!
But there is still the chi-square test. Chi-square test results were 18,549 for 'death,' which greatly exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square test is clearly satisfied for the COVID vaccine. Because the death signal is so huge, it even survived the PRR test.
This means that even using the CDCs own erroneous … formula, all three criteria were satisfied:
1.PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32
2.Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549
3.3 or more reports: There were over 31,214 death reports received by VAERS … which is more than 3
A safety signal should have been generated but wasn't. Why not? … Hundreds of thousands of American lives have been lost due to the inability of the CDC to deploy their own flawed safety signal analysis … It's been known since at least 2004 that using reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a better estimate of relative risk than PRR.27 I don't know why the CDC doesn't use it."
The CDC is also hiding the severity of side effects in other ways. As explained by Fenton,28 the way side effects are categorized by the CDC help obfuscate the scale of certain problems. For example, "cardiac failure acute," "cardiac failure," "infarction," "myocardial strain" and "myocardial fibrosis" are listed as separate categories, even though in real life they're all potential effects of myocarditis.
By separating them, you end up with fewer frequency counts per category, thereby giving you an underpowered chi-square test so that a warning signal is not triggered. If related categories were merged, far stronger safety signals would likely emerge.
CDC Has No Reasonable Defense
The CDC is responsible for monitoring both VAERS and V-Safe, and between these two databases, there's no possible way they could ever say they didn't know the shots were harming and killing millions of Americans.
The CDC also has access to other databases, including the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (before it was intentionally altered29) showed massive increases in debilitating and lethal conditions, including a tripling of cancer cases.30
The findings in these databases have never been brought forward during any of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meetings or the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meetings, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to people of all ages, including infants and pregnant women.
They even added these toxic shots to the childhood vaccine schedule — which allows states to mandate them for school attendance — without addressing any of the 66 safety signals found in the CDC's PRR analysis. The fact of the matter is that the CDC has known about these risks all along, and there's no excuse for not sharing and acting on these data.
Help Spread the Word
Mainstream media are ignoring all of this, so help spread the word. Everyone needs to know what the CDC's safety data reveal. To that end, here are a few suggestions for how you can help:
- Write or call your members of Congress and ask them to investigate the CDC's safety monitoring — We cannot have a public safety agency that is incapable of monitoring safety and taking appropriate action when problems are found, be it correcting a flawed formula or announcing that a safety signal has been detected. Of course, they must also publish their findings once an investigation has been made.
- Contact your local newspaper and urge them to investigate and report on the CDC's failure to act on safety signals.
- Share the data on social media and ask why no one in the media, Congress, academia or medical community is investigating these matters.
- Share this information with your doctor and members of the medical community.
- Also share it with university administrators, and ask them to explain how and why, in light of these data, they are still mandating COVID shots.
Charles Wharry (Darkbird18;)
This research on the COVID-19 pandemic has detailed information from many sides of this event because I have been researching the NWO and secret societies because these groups' agenda is to control the world and bring in a new ruler, "The Dark Brotherhood of Darkness". COVID-19 may not be a natural event, and if not then it is part of an ancient agenda called the WRM (World Revelation Movement).
No comments:
Post a Comment