Gladio B: The Origins of NATO’s Secret Islamic Terrorist Proxies – WideShut.co.uk: Beyond News

 

Gladio B: The Origins of NATO’s Secret Islamic Terrorist Proxies By Tom Secker | Mar 11, 2013 | Featured Articles, War and Terrorism, World News | 0 Comments 

Conspiracy Theories

Parcast

Operation Gladio Pt. 1 

During the Cold War, a secret military operation hid hundreds of weapons caches throughout Europe. They trained resistance fighters and prepared for a Communist invasion, and may have also orchestrated a series of devastating terrorist attacks.

At the end of WW2, as the Allied forces withdrew from continental Europe, the American Office of Strategic Services and the British Special Operations Executive left some paramilitary and intelligence units in place in the host countries. These so-called ‘stay behind’ secret armies had been used successfully against the Axis powers during the war, alongside various other commando-type units. Notably, Ian Fleming (author of James Bond) was loosely in charge of the famed 30 Assault Unit, and his brother was involved in setting up the stay-behinds used during the war. The purpose of these secret armies in the post-war period was to act as a first resort fall back option in case of a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. However they also had an implicit mission of harassing the Soviets pro-actively in time-honoured guerrilla fashion. During the Yalta conference Josef Stalin referred to this, talking about “agents of the London government connected with the so-called resistance” in Poland who had killed 212 Russian soldiers. Franklin Roosevelt suggested that would be a good point to adjourn the meeting, before Winston Churchill, without explicitly denying what Stalin had claimed, said, “I must put on record that both the British and Soviet governments have different sources of information in Poland and get different facts.” Given that it was Churchill who notoriously gave the order that British commando and resistance forces “set Europe ablaze”, the old soak was clearly just covering his back with this remark [1].

So, when the war ended this mission continued, with secret military and intelligence units operating in all the NATO member states, and even in those countries that were not members of NATO such as Sweden and, at least for a time, France. Only select members of the governments of the host countries were let in on the secret – sometimes even the heads of governments were kept in the dark by those within the military and intelligence institutions who were in the know. As such, the stay behind armies operated in the shadows, with almost no public recognition of their influence until 1990, when then Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti admitted that the units in Italy, codenamed Gladio, did exist and had existed for decades.

The Third Mission   

What Andreotti did not admit, but what has become clear through various official and unofficial investigations since then, is that the secret armies developed a third mission, namely, countering the domestic support for Communist and Socialist ideologies, policies and parties. MI5 files now available via the National Archives show that the paranoia in Western intelligence agencies about Communist political subversion took hold even before WW2, let alone the Cold War. Just as they had spied on, infiltrated and manipulated the turn of the century Anarchist movement, they subjected the trade unions, the labour movement, all Communist groups and many suspected Communists in positions of public authority (such as authors) to the same tactics. They even spied on their own former spies, including Arthur Ransome, who had been in Russia during the Bolshevik revolution keeping an eye on Leon Trotsky. Exactly when the pro-active part of the secret armies mission was turned into a means for domestic counter-subversion is not clear. At some point in the 1950s or 1960s there was a change in strategy that used the secret armies not just to gather intelligence on these groups and individuals, but to destroy their support through violence. Numerous terrorist outrages, from Turkey to Ireland, were instigated, provoked or simply carried out by members of the secret armies, including numerous bombings in Italy and the assassination of Aldo Moro, the Oktoberfest bombing in Munich and the Brabant Massacres in Belgium. All forms of urban terrorism were perpetrated, often by neo-Fascists posing as Leftists, in order to terrify the public, polarise public opinion and destroy support for mainstream Leftist political movements. The process was a great success, ultimately contributing to the downfall of the Soviet Union and ensuring that the policies chosen by the leaders of NATO countries were in keeping with the overall trajectory desired by the Anglo-American establishment [2] This story is relatively well-known among students of alternative history and advocates of alternative media, though the operation of the secret army here in the UK has not been subject to the detailed research of, for example, the Italian Gladio.
Perhaps this is a matter of semantics, because at the moment the stay behind units on the continent started their reign of terror, the Irish ‘Troubles’ also began. The same tactics were applied to the political movement for independence in Ireland as to the democratic Communist movement in Italy and elsewhere. Both the Republican and Loyalist radical factions were infiltrated, radicalised, militarised and set down a path of self-destructive and counter-productive violence. This issue of collusion in the Irish conflict has, like the stay behind armies, been outlined in numerous official and unofficial inquiries, most prominently the Cory inquiry [3]. While this knowledge about Gladio and the other secret armies is extremely significant, it is largely historical. There is no threat of domestic subversion from Communism anymore, either real or fabricated, and the world has kept on spinning. While the Irish conflict still simmers, the prolonged campaign of urban terrorism on the British mainland ended over 15 years ago, and so one might well ask why is this still important?

Gladio Part B

The answer to that question has been provided through a series of exceptional interviews with former FBI translator and respected whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, carried out by “one of the world’s few remaining 9/11 conspiracy theorists” James Corbett. Over the last few weeks, Edmonds has outlined how the contemporary spy-game around radical Islam, documented in the works of Nafeez Ahmed among others, is actually a follow-on from Gladio. She refers to it as ‘Gladio B’, identifying a change in policy around 1996, following the Suserluk incident that once again betrayed the forces at work in the Turkish deep state. To paraphrase Edmonds: though the collusion with radical Islam had been going on for decades, it wasn’t until 1996 that a formal decision was made by NATO to abandon their previous secret relationship with neo-Fascists and arch-Nationalists and replace them with Islamists.

                 Sibel Edmonds Documentary - Kill The Messenger

When Did Gladio A Become Gladio B?

Sibel Edmonds on Gladio B - Part 1

Sibel Edmonds and James Corbett on Gladio B Part 2

 This is corroborated by a lot of data, for example the international Islamist organisation Al-Muhajiroun suddenly became very prominent in the UK in 1996-7. Omar Bakri, who later admitted to being an MI5 informant, was a key figure in Al-Muhajiroun and its partner organisations like the International Islamic Front. They were central to the process by which young Muslims were recruited, radicalised, trained and sent to fight NATO’s war of destabilisation in the Balkans. Likewise Al Muqatila, more commonly known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group or LIFG, were also prominent in Britain at this time. Following their failed assassination attempt against Colonel Gaddafi in February 1996 several senior members of the group moved to Britain and established their main office there. Among them was Anas Al-Liby, who was probably an MI6 agent recruited as part of their sponsorship of the assassination attempt. He lived in Manchester from 1996 until 2000, having been granted political asylum. A raid on houses connected to Al-Liby in May 2000 resulted in several arrests, but Al-Liby slipped away, probably tipped off by the authorities. [4] According to Edmonds, since that time the Gladio B operation has expanded and includes the radical Islamisation of Central Asia and the Caucasus region specifically and across the Middle East more generally. Again, much of the available information supports her claims, especially regarding the Gulen Movement, but also NATO’s relationship with Islamist organisations such as the Muslim Brotherhood and with terrorist groups like Jundullah who are destabilising Iran and the MEK/MKO. Most of this can be gleaned from reading mainstream media reports with the right kind of eyes and ears, and by being patient enough to tolerate their habit of dropping occasionally truthful stories into their mix, but never teasing out the implications or sticking with the story to see where it leads. We are however still left with a key question.

While much of Edmonds’ analysis of Gladio B is eminently verifiable by those who know where to look, and chimes with much of my own work on terrorist double and triple agents, there is a lot of information that suggests that at least the idea of replacing the Fascist Gladio A with the Islamist Gladio B had occurred to strategists much earlier. The exposing of Gladio A began in Turkey in the 1970s, gaining considerable attention when several Gladio documents were published. These included U.S. Army Field Manual 31-15: Operations Against Irregular Forces, a 1960s US special warfare training manual that had been translated into Turkish [5]. It was perhaps inevitable that following the Turkish revelations that the overall Gladio story would have to be admitted, rendering bit useless.
Meanwhile in Italy a judge named Felice Casson was investigating various acts of terrorism including the 1972 Peteano bombing. This eventually led him to the perpetrator – Vincenzo Vinciguerra, a neo-Fascist and member of Ordine Nuovo and Avanguardia Nazionale who had been spirited out of the country after the bombing and protected by the international Gladio network. Vinciguerra was brought back to Italy and he started to talk, explaining the whole operation. At this point his protection was stopped, and he was subsequently put on trial. If the information coming out of Turkey wasn’t enough to signal to NATO that the veil of secrecy around the secret armies was wearing thin, then Vinciguerra’s testimony certainly was.

Belgian stay-behind network

The Belgian stay-behind network, colloquially called "Gladio" (meaning "sword"), was a secret mixed civilian and military unit, trained to form a resistance movement in the event of a Soviet invasion and part of a network of similar organizations in North Atlantic Treaty Organization states. It functioned from at least 1951 until 1990, when the Belgian branch was promptly and officially dissolved after its existence became publicly known following revelations concerning the Italian branch of the stay-behind network.

History

The history of the Belgian branch of the Gladio network starts in 1948 when Prime Minister Paul-Henri Spaak and Minister of Justice Paul Struye gave the Staatsveiligheid (State Security Service) permission to discuss with allied intelligence services the organization of a clandestine stay-behind network. These negotiations mainly happened with Sir Stewart Menzies of the British SIS and representatives of the then freshly founded CIA. The explicit objectives of this collaboration were outlined in a top-secret letter from Menzies to Spaak:^{[citation needed]}

The present object of [Anglo-Belgian co-operation between the special services] should be directed to two main aims:

1. The improvement of our information on the subject of Cominform and potential enemy activities in so far as they concern our two countries.
2. The preparation of appropriate intelligence and action organizations in the event of war.

— Sir Stewart Menzies, January 27, 1949

The amount of influence at this early stage, accredited to the CIA varies from source to source. CIA did not yet have full authority over the Office of Policy Coordination, which directed U.S. covert action until 1952. During the initial negotiations Menzies proposed to keep the US out of the organization, but Spaak objected to further developments not being in a tripartite (Belgium–Great-Britain–United States) or multilateral setting. In the final report of the parliamentary inquiry there is little mention of CIA involvement, but investigative journalist Walter de Bock points, based on Pentagon documents,^{[clarification needed]} at the CIA's significant early organizational role and de facto control until 1968.^[1] Similarly, Colonel Margot complains in an internal note, dated April 8, 1959, about the influence of the US intelligence services on the Belgian branch of the Gladio-network.^[2]

These initial negotiations led to closer collaboration between the three countries' secret services under the name Tripartite Meeting Belgium. Following this meeting, the Belgian stay-behind network became operational, but it was not until January 4, 1952, that the first formal instructions for stay-behind operations were issued to Ludovicus Caeymaex (Staatsveiligheid) and General Etienne Baele.^[3]

Growing polarization between East and West and awareness of the need for continental collaboration led to the foundation in 1949 of the Comité Clandestin de l'Union Occidentale (C.C.U.O.), which contained Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxembourg, France and Great-Britain.^[4] The C.C.U.O. laid the base for the formation of the NATO and coordinated the various stay-behind networks in the five member countries.^[5] Its functions were transferred to the Clandestine Planning Committee (C.P.C.), another NATO-organization in 1951, which was renamed in to Coordination and Planning Committee in 1959.^[6] The C.P.C. elaborated a plan for installing two taskgroups, one for communications and one for secret networks, a structure reflected in the Allied Coordination Committee (A.C.C.) founded in 1958 to relieve the C.P.C. of some of its tasks.^[6]

The A.C.C. consisted of the members of the C.C.U.O. plus the US and coordinated the stay-behind activities, as was stipulated on its first meeting in April 1959 under French supervision:

The A.C.C. is a six-power regional committee for providing mutual consultation and developing policy guidance on matters of common interest regarding stay behind matters in the Western European countries concerned.^[6] [added emphasis]

— Declaration of principles, April 29–30, 1959

These interlocking coordination organizations, like the C.P.C. and A.C.C, were initially headquartered in Paris, but moved along with SHAPE, NATO's central headquarters, to Mons in Belgium after the French withdrawal from NATO's unified command structure in 1966. After the initial six counties, Germany, Italy, Denmark and Norway became members of the A.C.C.. Though all of the counties were members of NATO, an official link between the A.C.C and NATO was denied. The parliamentary committee noted "... one can not do away with the impression that in practice closer and closer relations did come to exist".^[7]

In the following decades the stay-behind activities were mainly coordinated through A.C.C.-meetings. These activities consisted officially of (multinational) training activities like infiltration, parachute jumping and long range communications, of which numerous were held at least between 1972 and 1989.^[8] Due to the secretive nature of the network, the milieu of various operatives involved and the Cold War setting, allegations were raised that the stay-behind network was during this time also at least indirectly involved with clandestine actions on Belgian soil. The last documented meeting of the A.C.C took place on 23 and 24 October 1990 under supervision of General Van Calster, where the participants discussed a.o. a scaling-back of the stay-behind network in light of changing international relations.^{[citation needed]}

This was the meeting that Italian president Giulio Andreotti^{[clarification needed]} was referring to following the October 24, 1990 revelation of the existence of Gladio in Italy, a revelations several others governments' spokespersons^{[example needed]} reacted to by claiming that any stay-behind in their own country was history. This only exasperated Andreotti, who declared to the press that the last stay-behind meeting had taken place in Belgium a few days ago. After the exposure of the Italian branch and inquiries by Italian officials to their Belgian counterparts, Defense minister Guy Coëme and Prime Minister Wilfried Martens made the existence of the Belgian section of the Gladio-network public in a press meeting on November 7, 1990.^{[citation needed]}

The government decided on November 23, 1990, a few days after the proposition for a parliamentary investigation to officially disband the network.^{[citation needed]}

Organization, activities and resources

The Belgian Gladio-branch consisted of two separate sections:

• S.D.R.A VIII (French: Service de Documentation, de Renseignments et d'Action VIII, "Documentation, Information and Action Service VIII"), residing under the military intelligence service, the Belgian General Information and Security Service (S.G.R) and thus the minister of Defense.
• S.T.C/Mob.^[9] (Dutch: Sectie training, communicatie en documentatie "Training, Communication and Documentation Service"), residing under the Staatsveiligheid and thus the minister of Justice.

S.D.R.A VIII was one of the sections of S.D.R.A (military security service), which in its turn is part of the S.G.R. (general military intelligence and security service). The S.G.R's functions are formally described in a decree from 1989 and are twofold: intelligence gathering and ensuring the security of military personnel and installations, issuing clearances, etc. The S.D.R.A is mandated with the second task, and is dived into functional sections: for instance, S.D.R.A III is contra-infiltration (for S.D.R.A XI, see further).

The members of S.D.R.A VIII were military personnel, trained in unorthodox warfare, combat and sabotage, parachute jumping and maritime operations.^[10] The operatives were trained to accompany the government aboard in case of a Soviet invasion, and then establish liaisons with the Belgian resistance movement and engage in warfare.^{[citation needed]}

Oversight

During the parliamentary investigation, the committee stumbled by chance on the existence of the Coordination and Planning Committee secretariat, which formed S.D.R.A XI, but was funded through secret NATO payments. When Paul Detrembleur, former head of the S.D.R.A and last administrator of S.D.R.A XI/C.P.C.-secretariat, was called to testify before the parliamentary inquiry about the activities of this section about the Gladio-activities, he refused to divulge any information.^[11][12]

The final parliamentary report stressed the resulting incomplete insight into the functioning of the C.P.C. and its relation to S.D.R.A. VIII, which formally organized the military section of the Gladio network. The report noted that the C.P.C. was responsible for the relations between the Belgian secret services and the NATO high command (especially SHAPE), and that the witnesses denied being involved with stay-behind activities. The reason was, the latter claimed, that NATO was "forward defending"-oriented and thus not interested in stay-behind activities in countries like Belgium, which did not border Warsaw Pact-nations. The commission then further noted the discrepancy between these claims and given reason, and the fact that the C.P.C. co-coordinated the S.D.R.A. VIII and participated in the A.C.C.-meetings.^[13]

S.T.C/Mob. function and oversight

The civilian branch of the Belgian stay-behind had the mission to collect intelligence under conditions of enemy occupation which could be useful to the government and to organize secure communication routes to evacuate the members of the government and other people with official functions.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008)

Military trainers/operatives and civilian operatives

• Recruitment (how, criteria)
• Training activities (joint international training/war games, sabotage, intelligence ....)
• Funding (equipment)
• Weapons, weapons-depots.

Both military intelligence and Staatsveiligheid maintained dossiers on Gladio training activities, of which incomplete versions were made available to the parliamentary committee. Events from the list of operations by the military branch was provided by Coëme and is denoted by A, while events from the list from the archives of the Staatsveiligheid (titled "Overzicht oefeningen in het kader ACC – periode 1980-1990") is denoted by B:

• (A) 1972: Training on clandestine techniques.
• (A) 1976: Training on radio-communications, intelligence, maritime operations, aerial operations and escape routes.
• (A) 1977: Training on optimizing techniques to locate downed pilots and the use of escape routes.
• (A) 1978: In-door training on clandestine missions.
• (A) 1980: Training on parachute-jumping, long-distance radio communication and clandestine techniques.
• (B) June 1980: OREGAN II
• (A) 1981: Lessons and training on clandestine activities.
• (A) 1983: Training on escape routes, intelligence, aerial operations and radio communications.
• (A) 1985: Six trainings (at least two outside Belgium, one in Belgium): infiltration a parachute-jumping, extracting material through escape routes.
• (A) 1986, 1987 & 1988: : Trainings outside Belgium on intelligence operations and radio communications.

Minister Melchior Wathelet testified before the parliamentary inquiry that secret weapon depots were created in the 1950s, of which a first one was discovered in 1957 due to a landslide, and a second one in 1959 by playing children. He further stated that after these discoveries it was decided to abandon the depots and transfer the weapons to a military depot.^[8] An inventory report, dated 1991, for the military section of Gladio mentions inflatable boats, video-equipment and around 300 weapons, including M1 carbines, MP40 submachine guns and "armes en cocon", weapons packaged for long-term storage.^[14]

Parliamentary inquiry

Overview

After the existence of the Belgian branch of the Gladio-network became public, speculations and allegations about involvement of the Gladio-operatives in various high-profile and often unsolved crimes and terrorist acts during the 1980s began to appear in the media. To investigate these allegations and clarify the operation of the Belgian branch, a senatorial investigative commission was established on 20 December 1990. It was tasked with clarifying the structure, aims etc. of the network and the amount of oversight; which connections existed with domestic and foreign intelligence and police services; and whether there was a link with events previously examined in parliamentary inquiries^[15] or certain serious crimes and terrorist acts committed the previous decade.^[4]

Chairman senator Roger Lallemand ^{[clarification needed]}

The commission convened from 16 January 1991 until 5 July 1991, during which fifty seven meetings were held and thirty seven witnesses were heard. Amongst those who testified before the commission were ministers Guy Coëme, Melchior Wathelet and Louis Tobback; former administrator-director-general of the Staatsveiligheid (77-90) and head of STC-MOB Albert Raes, Ludo Caeymaex (administrator-general Staatsveiligheid 58–77); then current administrator-general of the Staatsveiligheid Stéphane Schewebach, Jacques Devlieghere (Staatsveiligheid 78–89, nr. 2); S.D.R.A.-operative André Moyen; Gladio-instructors Guibert Nieweling (code name "Addie"), Michel Huys ("Alain"), Etienne Annarts ("Stéphane").

Problems

The two major obstacles facing the commission of inquiry were firstly the secret nature of the case and the related unwillingness of witnesses in disclosing information and secondly time constraints.

Firstly, due to the nature of the case, and the various legal, professional and military requirements of confidentiality, the commission went to great lengths in limiting public access to discussed material. For instance, the parliament did forgo an earlier proposition for a parliamentary in favor for the proposition by Lallemand which included the requirement that the commission operated behind closed doors (in contravention to the regular parliamentary inquiry procedures).^[16] Lallemand placed also additional restriction on the ability to communicate with the press, handling of documents, etc. These restrictions were criticized both for being undemocratic, unnecessary or counter-productive and for not being strict enough.^[17]

The committee initially envisaged a solution whereby the names of the operatives were handed to three selected magistrates, familiar with the relevant unsolved criminal investigations. The relevant agencies and witnesses refused to do so, with the refusal varying from polite claims of forgetfulness or references to oaths of secrecy to outright hostility.^[18] This issue was compounded by the fact that records on former operatives were systematically purged and the magistrates were not up to date with more recent investigations. Gijsels noted that order... ?Names with the CIA/London? The final report then concluded that the cooperation from both the military and the Staatsveiligheid was generally satisfactory, but deplored the stubborn withholding of the names of civilian operatives. Parlementaire Commissie (1991), p. ?^{[clarification needed]}

Secondly, the commission faced time-related problems. The time allotted to the commission was initially five months, a period which the final report deplored as "very little" and short in comparison to other inquiries. The Senate granted on July 12, 1991, a request for extra time, which enabled the committee to work for another three months. Unfortunately most of the allotted time fell during the parliamentary recess, which further frustrated the effort to fully pursue the intended lines of inquiry. For instance, the commission had planned to interview several investigative journalists, people like Richard Brenneke and had requested several "dossiers chauds" (English: "hot cases").^{[clarification needed]}

Handled material and major findings

Handled material: Westmooreland, John Wood/Rudy Daems, ...

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008)

Conclusions and impact

Reactions & indirect effect inquiry: Comité-I.^{[clarification needed]} In 1995, the Belgian Chamber of Representatives organized a parliamentary inquiry into the effectiveness of the Belgian police and judiciary with regards to the Nijvel gang investigation. The conclusions of this inquiry, as well as the earlier Senate inquiry on SDRA8 and the Chamber inquiry on banditism, resulted in the preparation of new legislation governing the mission and methods of the Belgian State Security Service and Belgian General Information and Security Service, which was passed in 1998.^{[citation needed]}

                                            Charles E. Wharry (Darkbird18),

Darkbird18 is looking at the Gladio events and I can see darkness at it highest level the Illuminati, NWO and the dark forces of darkness is at work here! This terrorist is all big plain  by the dark side to control the world for same unseen reason but it most be important because they have the whole world looking but what is really happen is some where else but what? This article will help you understand how deep the rabbit holes goes and the key players in this dark game for control and power but for who? I smell a unseen player in this game so deep in darkness not even the bad guys can see it hand and man what a hand! Read this article and watch the YouTube to get the information on Gladio. The rest of the article from WideShut.co.uk can be read by clicking on the link below………….. Gladio B: The Origins of NATO’s Secret Islamic Terrorist Proxies – WideShut.co.uk: Beyond News

LiveJournal Tags: Terrorist,illuminati,NWO,NATO,Shadow Governments,Secret Society

The Terra Papers – True History of Humanity and Earth and Ex-CIA Officer Encountered With Reptilian Alien; Says Reptilian Race Walking Among Us

 

The Terra Papers – True History of Humanity and Earth

In the vastness of human knowledge and the mysteries it attempts to unravel, some narratives challenge our traditional understanding of the world and the universe. One such account is contained in a controversial set of studies and stories known as the Terra Papers.

Table of Contents

• Pro-Star Collection by Robert Morning Sky
• A Different Narrative of Earth’s History
• The Controversy and Speculation
• Delving Deeper into the Terra Papers
  • Robert Morning Sky: The Man Behind The Terra Papers
  • Extraordinary Beginnings: The Star Elder Encounter
  • The Alternate History Unveiled
• The Terra Papers: A Journey Through Time and Space
  • Cosmic Narratives and Ancient Empires
  • Earth’s Transformation and Extraterrestrial Influence
  • Extraterrestrial Beings and Human Evolution
  • Challenging Traditional Understanding
• Earth: A Prison Planet?
  • The “SSS” Empire’s Control
  • Continuation of Control
  • Ruling Elite and Extraterrestrial Connections
  • Allegations of a Manipulative Ruling Elite
  • Mediators Between Empires and Humanity
  • Spiritual and Metaphysical Elements
  • Extraterrestrial Beings: Physical and Spiritual
  • A Universe Beyond the Physical
  • Consciousness and Universal Connection
• Robert Morning Sky: The Man Behind the Documents
  • Cultural Background and Unique Perspective
  • Native American Traditions and Interpretations
  • Extraterrestrial Knowledge: A Remarkable Claim
  • Holistic View of Reality
  • Challenging Conventional Wisdom
• Alternative Theories and Interpretations
  • Diverse Perspectives on the Terra Papers
  • Science Fiction or Metaphysical Teaching?
  • Spiritual and Symbolic Interpretations
  • Misinformation or Conspiracy?
• Scientific and Historical Perspectives
  • Empirical Evidence vs. Extraterrestrial Claims
  • The Duality of Perspectives
• Conspiracy Theories: Ruling Elite and Manipulation
  • Manipulation of World Events
  • Orchestrating Major Events
• Limited Attention from Mainstream Media and Academia
  • Lack of Mainstream Attention
  • Hypotheses on Lack of Attention
  • Suppression or Complexity?
  • Complexity of the Terra Documents
• The Controversial Nature of the Terra Papers
  • A Narrative Difficult to Verify
  • Challenges in Verification
  • The Role of Evidence and Personal Belief
• Myth or Reality? Share Your Opinion!
  • Diverse Perspectives from Readers
  • Engage in the Discussion

Pro-Star Collection by Robert Morning Sky

Pro-Star is a collection of writings by Robert Morning Sky, which he collected while researching an ancient story about the “Star Elder” told by his grandfather. The collection presents an alternate history of Earth and humanity that is as fascinating as it is controversial. These documents reveal a cosmic-scale narrative that suggests that what we know about our planet and its inhabitants is deeply intertwined with extraterrestrial beings and ancient galactic empires.

A Different Narrative of Earth’s History

From the dawn of our planet to the evolution of humanity, the Terra Papers offer a narrative that is starkly different from what we have learned from history books. They suggest that our world is not what it seems and that forces beyond our understanding have determined the course of our history.

The Controversy and Speculation

The Terra Papers sparked heated debate and speculation, with readers torn between skepticism and belief. The writing is the intersection of history, mythology, ufology, and conspiracy theory, challenging us to question our understanding of reality.

Delving Deeper into the Terra Papers

In this article, we’ll delve deeper into the fascinating world of the Terra Papers, exploring the extraordinary claims they contain, the man behind them, and the various theories and conspiracies surrounding them.

Robert Morning Sky: The Man Behind The Terra Papers

The man behind The Terra Papers is as intriguing as the narrative he presents. Robert Morning Sky is of Apache and Hopi descent. He is not just an author but a storyteller, a researcher, and a man on a mission to share a story that he believes has been hidden from humanity.

Extraordinary Beginnings: The Star Elder Encounter

Morning Sky’s journey into the world of the Terra Papers begins with a remarkable family story. According to him, his grandfather was among a group of Native Americans who in 1947 came across a crashed spacecraft in the Arizona desert. From the wreckage, they rescued an alien creature that survived the crash, which they named “Star Elder.” The star elder, as Morning Sky recounts, shares with them stories of space wars, ancient galactic empires, and the secret history of Earth and humanity.

The Alternate History Unveiled

These stories, passed down to Skye by his grandfather, form the basis of The Terra Papers. Skye’s background and the source of his information add further fascination to The Terra Papers. His claims question not only our understanding of history but also our perceptions of knowledge and truth. They blur the lines between myth and reality, between what we know and what we believe.

The Terra Papers: A Journey Through Time and Space

Cosmic Narratives and Ancient Empires

According to the notes, the history of our universe is a saga of space wars and ancient galactic empires. The book tells the story of the “SSS” empire, a reptilian race known for its warfare and mind control prowess. Also mentioned is the “ASA-RRR” empire, a race of mammals known for their ruthlessness and expansionism. These empires have had an impact on the course of events on Earth and the evolution of humanity.

Earth’s Transformation and Extraterrestrial Influence

The narrative also presents Earth as a planet of considerable interest to these alien empires. From a barren rock in space, Earth, or Terra as it is called in the notes, is transformed into a thriving planet – a transformation that is assumed to be the result of extraterrestrial intervention.

Extraterrestrial Beings and Human Evolution

The book, which is based on Skye’s notes and research, also suggests that these extraterrestrial beings have influenced the evolution of humanity. Studies suggest that these beings have been both our gods and our devils, guiding us, manipulating us, and shaping our history in ways we still don’t fully understand.

Challenging Traditional Understanding

This alternate history of the universe challenges our traditional understanding of our world and our place in the cosmos.

Earth: A Prison Planet?

One of the most surprising claims made in the Terra Papers is that Earth, our home, is actually a prison planet. This concept, as radical as it is intriguing, suggests that humanity’s existence and evolution have been influenced by forces beyond our understanding.

The “SSS” Empire’s Control

According to the Papers, Earth has been turned into a prison planet by the “SSS” Empire. This transformation was part of a larger cosmic conflict in which Earth and humanity were the prize.

Continuation of Control

The narrative states that the “SSS” empire has created a system of control over Earth, manipulating the evolution of humanity and directing the course of our history. It is said that this system of control still exists, with the “SSS” empire continuing to influence events on Earth behind the scenes.

Ruling Elite and Extraterrestrial Connections

This statement presents a radically new interpretation of human history and our place in the universe. It suggests that our understanding of the world and ourselves is incomplete and that there are forces at play that we do not yet fully understand.

Allegations of a Manipulative Ruling Elite

Another intriguing aspect is the allegation of a ruling elite with extraterrestrial origins or connections. This elite, the narrative goes, manipulates events on Earth.

Mediators Between Empires and Humanity

The Terra Papers suggest that selected rulers are a product of the “SSS” Empire’s control of Earth. They are presented as mediators between extraterrestrial empires and humanity, carrying out the will of those empires on Earth. This ruling elite, the narrative suggests, holds key positions in various aspects of human society, including governmental, military, and religious institutions. Through these posts, they can influence events on Earth, directing the course of human history in accordance with the plans of extraterrestrial rulers.

Spiritual and Metaphysical Elements

While the Terra Papers are most often discussed in the context of their extraterrestrial claims and alternate history, they also contain a great wealth of spiritual and metaphysical ideas.

Extraterrestrial Beings: Physical and Spiritual

The narrative suggests that the extraterrestrial beings described in the documents are not only physical but also spiritual with a deep understanding of the metaphysical aspects of existence. They have shared some of this knowledge with humanity, influencing our spiritual beliefs and practices.

A Universe Beyond the Physical

The Terra Papers present a universe that is not only physical but also spiritual. They suggest that our existence is not only a physical but also a spiritual journey and that our evolution is not only biological but also spiritual.

Consciousness and Universal Connection

The story also explores the concept of consciousness, suggesting that it is a fundamental aspect of the universe. All beings, including humans, are part of one universal consciousness, and our individual consciousnesses are expressions of that universal consciousness.

Robert Morning Sky: The Man Behind the Documents

Cultural Background and Unique Perspective

Robert Morning Sky grew up with the stories and traditions of his ancestors. He begins his extraordinary journey in search of evidence for a story related to family history. This story would later become the basis of his work.

Native American Traditions and Interpretations

Morning Sky’s cultural background and upbringing significantly shaped his perspective and approach to the information presented in the Terra Papers. His understanding of Native American traditions and spirituality gives him a unique lens through which to interpret and present this information.

Extraterrestrial Knowledge: A Remarkable Claim

One of the most fascinating aspects of Skye’s story is undoubtedly the claim that the information in the Terra Papers came from an extraterrestrial being.

Holistic View of Reality

In addition to the Terra Papers, Morning Sky also writes other works and shares ideas that address similar topics. These include discussions of extraterrestrials, alternate histories, and spiritual and metaphysical concepts.

Challenging Conventional Wisdom

Mourning’s works present a holistic view of reality, integrating physical and spiritual aspects and exploring the connections between humanity and the cosmos. His ideas challenge conventional wisdom and invite readers to question, wonder, and seek a deeper understanding of our world and the universe.

Alternative Theories and Interpretations

Diverse Perspectives on the Terra Papers

The extraordinary claims and conflicting accounts recorded in the pages of the Terra Papers have given rise to many alternative theories and interpretations. These theories are as varied as they are intriguing. They offer different perspectives on the information presented in the book.

Science Fiction or Metaphysical Teaching?

Some theories suggest that the Terra Papers are a form of science fiction, a creative exploration of extraterrestrial life and space history. They suggest that the narrative, while not literally true, represents a metaphorical exploration of human existence and the universe.

Spiritual and Symbolic Interpretations

Other theories propose that the writings are a form of spiritual or metaphysical teaching, presenting truths about the nature of reality and consciousness in the form of an extraterrestrial narrative. They suggest that documents should be interpreted not only literally but also symbolically and spiritually.

Misinformation or Conspiracy?

Still, others opine that they are a form of misinformation, a deliberate attempt to mislead or confuse. It is hypothesized that the documents are part of a larger conspiracy to divert attention from the real truths confirming extraterrestrial life and human history.

Scientific and Historical Perspectives

Empirical Evidence vs. Extraterrestrial Claims

The major strands of science and history, based on empirical evidence and rigorous methodology, present a perspective on the universe and human history that is fundamentally different from the narrative in the Terra Papers. They offer a universe that is vast and complex, but also comprehensible through observation, experimentation, and logical reasoning.

The Duality of Perspectives

The Terra Papers, on the other hand, offer a universe that is not only physical but also spiritual and metaphysical. They suggest that human history has been influenced by extraterrestrial beings and cosmic forces—ideas that challenge conventional wisdom.

Conspiracy Theories: Ruling Elite and Manipulation

Manipulation of World Events

One of the most famous conspiracy theories is that of a ruling elite that manipulates world events. According to this theory, the “SSS” Empire created a system of control over Earth, using individuals in key positions to carry out their plans. They hold important positions in various aspects of human society, including governmental, military, and religious institutions.

Orchestrating Major Events

This theory suggests that many of the major events in human history were orchestrated by these very people, from wars and revolutions to technological advances and cultural changes. The theory suggests that our understanding of history is incomplete and that there are hidden forces at work in it that we do not yet fully understand.

Limited Attention from Mainstream Media and Academia

Lack of Mainstream Attention

Despite the extraordinary claims and controversial narrative of the Papers, they have received relatively little attention from the mainstream media and academia. The lack of attention on the part of the mass public is a cause for controversy and speculation among the book’s readers and followers.

Hypotheses on Lack of Attention

One hypothesis suggests that the lack of mainstream attention is due to the radical nature of the claims. The narrative’s departure from established scientific and historical understandings makes it difficult for many people to accept. Because of this, it is often dismissed as marginal or pseudoscientific.

Suppression or Complexity?

Other assumptions about the lack of attention on the part of dominant perception and understanding are that it is the result of deliberate suppression. According to this theory, the ruling elite mentioned in the Papers have influence over the mainstream media and academia and use this to suppress information that might threaten established control.

Complexity of the Terra Documents

It is also possible that the lack of attention on the other hand is due to the complexity and contradictory nature of the Terra documents. The narrative challenges many deeply held beliefs and assumptions, making it difficult for many to engage with.

The Controversial Nature of the Terra Papers

A Narrative Difficult to Verify

Whatever the reasons, the lack of mainstream consumer attention to the work heightens its intrigue and controversy.

Challenges in Verification

It is important to note that, in the end, the Terra papers present a narrative that is as fascinating as it is difficult to verify. Claims of ancient galactic empires, extraterrestrial influence on human history, and a ruling elite manipulating world events are extraordinary and challenge our traditional understanding of reality.

The Role of Evidence and Personal Belief

The difficulty of verifying these claims contributes significantly to the controversial nature of the work. Without empirical evidence or a clear method of verification, the narrative exists in the space wandering between fact and fiction, between what we know and what we believe.

Myth or Reality? Share Your Opinion!

Diverse Perspectives from Readers

Some readers accept the narrative as truth by referring to their personal faith, spiritual insights, or the consonance of the narrative with their own experiences and understandings. Others, however, demand evidence, arguing that extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.

Engage in the Discussion

What is your opinion? Myth or reality? Share with us in a comment!