The Good The Bad and The Ugly

Showing posts with label The Bad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Bad. Show all posts

Thursday, November 30, 2023

Update : 01/05/2022: The SECRET BOOK of the ILLUMINATI: 03/30/2019 :Secret Societies (Documentary) and SECRET ILLUMINATI - Eye of The Phoenix; The Secret Destiny of America by Manly Palmer Hall and Nicholas Roerich "Chintamani Stone,"

SECRET ILLUMINATI - Eye of The Phoenix; The Secret Destiny of America  by Manly Palmer Hall and Nicholas Roerich "Chintamani Stone,"


 Secret Societies ( Documentary )

From the times of Pythagoras to all until the advanced lifestyle scenario today, secret societies do exist in varied parts of the world, for varied objectives. Pythagoras and his esoteric school, as well as the mysterious disappearance of his corpse, were an unsolved mystery all now. Likewise, history has hundreds and hundreds of mysteries that remain unsolved. A keen eye for details can reveal the invisible hand of the secret societies that determined the destiny of the commoners, since way a long time now.



        The SECRET BOOK of the ILLUMINATI | Do You Have the Eyes to See? Here we are? Explore the hidden books of the Pythagorean Illuminati. There is more to the Illuminati but

what is the real and whole truth? This new Youtube from Morgue is to watch with a very open eye because he is very strange.




This high-quality documentary proves the following points about the two Seals on the back of the One Dollar Bill with clarity and precision:
  1. The two Seals are Egyptian and Luciferian
  2. The two Seals were introduced by Freemasons, in 1782
  3. Masonic President Franklin Roosevelt, aided by his Secretary of Agriculture/Vice President Wallace, ordered these Seals to be placed on the back of the Dollar Bill in 1935, having been urged on and advised by the Russian channeler/mystic, Nicolas Roerich
  4. Americans had no idea that the Roosevelt Administration was as controlled by mystic, Black Magick forces, as it was. Had they known the degree to which Roosevelt was controlled by Black Magick forces, he would have been forced out of office immediately
  5. Former Satanist, Doc Marquis, reveals that, while in the Illuminati, he was taught that the two Seals are NOT official seals of the United States, but of the Global Illuminati!
  6. Doc Marquis also reveals that these two Seals hide three (3) hexagrams plus a hidden message about Freemasonry. These hexagrams form a '666'
  7. We correctly link the symbolism of the All-Seeing Eye of Lucifer hovering over the unfinished pyramid on the back of the Dollar Bill to the coming prophesied Third Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem!
The Masons have been steadfastly determined since 1782 to seize control of the Temple Mount so they could resurrect Solomon's Temple for use by their Masonic Christ!

Since this was the plan in 1782 when the Seals were created, the Masons made sure that the symbolism of the unfinished pyramid directly tied into their plan to rebuild Solomon's Temple.

When the Masonic Christ (Antichrist) is planned to be the "Living Stone" to top off the unfinished pyramid! You will be amazed at this simple, but profound, symbolism linkage and by the thorough degree to which this plan fulfills Bible prophecy exactly!

You will be shocked to realize that the stage for the fulfillment of this End of the Age prophecy was set all the way back to 1782!

                          SECRET ILLUMINATI - Eye of The Phoenix - FEATURE FILM



from conspiracy central Website

The film "Eye of the Phoenix" is nearly 3 hours long and it was very long.

What do I think of it?

It is one of the greatest documentaries I've ever seen in my life. It focused not only on the Great Seal but other subjects like the Illuminati, and the Theosophical Society (whose co-founder was, of course, Madame H.P. Blavatsky. She followed the Gnostic lie that the Devil in the Bible offering Adam the fruit of knowledge was the good guy, while Jehovah was the bad guy. That is one definition of the creed of Gnosticism), the Philosopher Stone, and other issues.

The film made known that certain occultists want to create their utopian new world order (and involved in that goal is the re-establishment of Solomon's Temple. Freemasonry explicitly wants this goal as quotes exist of this). It outlined information that I knew about and it presented information that I didn't know about.

One of the major parts of the film was about the Phoenix bird.

The Phoenix bird in legend would die and burn plus it would reappear later. In ancient cultures, it represented the false sun-god (even a peacock or a strange feathered bird) or even Lucifer. That is why occult Secret Societies to this day outline worship of Lucifer (or Satan). One of the old names for the Phoenix is FENEX in the Greek language, which equals 666 in the Greek gematria calculation.

The Phoenix was caused by the shining one, which is an old name for Lucifer ironically.

The occult groups believe that ancient knowledge didn't just exist in ancient Babylon, but in Ancient Atlantis (where objects like The Emerald Tablets of Thoth and the lapis exillis. These objects were lusted after by Rosicrucian Nicholas Roerich and his temporary ally 32nd Degree Freemason Henry Wallace).

Myths claim that the lapis exillis was the stone from Lucifer's crown that broke after Lucifer fought the archangel, Michael. This story is found in Manly P. Hall's literature. Masonic apologists may deny that the Great Seal is of Masonic origin (even though Masonic symbols are on them), but the one Dollar Bill is definitely of Masonic origin.

People certainly will compare it to Riddles and Stone. In my opinion, the Eye of the Phoenix is a level above Riddles and Stone in terms of the information describing America's secret history. What was particularly great about the film was how it described the Jacobite Rebellions in a simplistic fashion. The Jacobites supported the pro-Catholic King James II of England. He was forced out of the throne via the Glorious Revolution of 1688.

The Jacobites in large numbers went into America and their Scottish descendants influenced the American Revolution (with Masons like Hugh Mercer).

The Eye of the Phoenix is an excellent film that delves into higher levels of information revolving around the agenda of Secret Societies. Nicholas Roerich, as the documentary proves, wanted to create the global government system (even an Asian Union first).

The film is like information overload since it reaches into more facts than elaborates on other levels of concepts.




The Secret Destiny of America
by Manly Palmer Hall
Philosophical Research Society
3341 Griffith Park Boulevard,
Los Angeles 27, California
1944

from Yamaguchi Website


World democracy was the secret dream of the great clas貞ical philosophers. ...
Thousands of years before Columbus they were aware of the existence of our
Western Hemi貞phere and selected it to be the site of the philosophic empire. ...
The brilliant plan of the Ancients has survived to our time, and it will continue to
function until the great work is accomplished. ...
The American nation des計erately needs a vision of its own purpose.

By preserved symbols we can know that it is from the remote past, from the deep shadows of the medieval world, as well as from the early struggles of more modern times, that the power of American democracy has come
AMERICA cannot refuse the challenge of leadership in the postwar world.  Mere physical reconstruction of ravaged countries and the reorganization of political, economic, and social sys負ems is the lesser task we will face.  The larger problem and the great chal衍enge is in how to set up a new order of world ethics firmly established on a foundation of demo苞ratic idealism.

Experts in various fields have already submitted programs designed to meet the needs of those na負ions whose way of life has been disrupted by war.  But with the failing common to specially trained minds, these planners incline to think mostly in the terms of their own particular interests.  As yet, no one has touched the fundamentals of inter要ational ethics.  No one has advanced a working plan securely based upon a broad, deep, and sym計athetic understanding of the human being and his problems.  The thinking has been in the dual fields of power politics and material economics, with remedies expressed in terms of charts, blue計rints, patterns, and industrial programs.

But, there is one new and encouraging element present in most of the recommendations of today's experts.  They are recognizing the necessity of con苞eiving the world as one inter-dependent structure.  Yet, even as they recognize the need for a unity of human interests, their recommendations are for the perpetuation of highly competitive economic policies, which, if they are consistently applied, must lead the end to war and discord.

It is not an easy task to unite the efforts of the human race toward the accomplishment of any common good.  Mankind in the majority is selfish, provincial in attitude, and concerned primarily with personal success and acquiring creature comforts.  It will not be possible to build an enduring peace until the average man has been convinced that per貞onal selfishness is detrimental to personal happiness and personal success.  It must be shown that self-seeking has gone out of fashion and that the world is moving on to a larger conception of living.

The postwar planners have more of idealism in their programs than has ever before been expressed in the problem of the relationships of nations.  But it still is not enough.  A clear and complete state衫ent of a world purpose is required--a world dreams great enough to inspire unity of world effort.

These are the days of America's opportunity to lead a still troubled mankind toward a better way of life.  If we meet this challenge, we will ensure the not only survival of our nation for centuries to come, but we shall gain the enduring gratitude of our fellowmen and Americans will be remembered to the end of time as a great enlightened people.

It is not enough that we solve particular prob衍ems.  We must solve the very cause of the problem itself.  Wars, depressions, crime, dictators and their oppression, are the symptoms giving clear indica負ion of a greater ailment.  To examine each prob衍em solely in terms of the problem itself, without recognition of its true relationship to a larger and more universal necessity, is to fail in the broader implications of an enduring peace and prosperity.

Experience should have taught us long ago that policies which have originated from material con貞iderations and attitudes have proved inadequate.  The whole story of civilization and the records of history tell us that all such adjustments hold no hope of lasting peace or security.  But, here we are again preparing ourselves to be satisfied with tem計orary solutions for permanent problems.

The recognition is long overdue that we over貞implify the problem of world peace when we think that process is one of breaking the task down for examination of its materialistic parts, and then hopefully devising an applicable remedy for each of these.  The physical conditions of human existence are not the whole of the human problem.  We could adjust all material considerations to the point of supremest equity, and yet accomplish vir負ually nothing solutional.

The greatest of known problems is the human problem.  And not until the all-embracing examination is made into every phase of human needs can there be an adequate reconstruction policy for a postwar world.  That man is physical is obvious, but he is also mental, and emotional;  he is spiritual, and he has a soul.  These latter factors are not so obvious.

What to do about them is not so easy; for they are difficult to understand, and even more difficult to classify and reduce to a working pattern.  We as builders of a civilization will have to learn that only when equal consideration is given to each of these elements of man's nature will we arrive at the solutions for the disasters into which men and nations precipitate themselves.

Our postwar reconstructors--ours, if not by our selection, at least with our consent--are not out貞tandingly qualified for this broader task.  Few indeed are the statesmen and politicians who have any conception of man as a spiritual being.  And as for military leaders, they are primarily disci計linarians, invaluable as such in times of war, but not at all emotionally geared to problems of indi赳idualistic peacetime character.  And world plan要ers recruited from among our industrial leaders, it must be admitted, are not generally informed on the workings of the human psyche.  Those who have made the study of human conduct their life work, the sociologists, have little scientific knowl苟dge of the hidden springs that animate that very conduct into its amazing diversity of manifesta負ions.  And if a word is to be said for bringing in the clergy, it might be that the theologian planner who will be truly useful will be one who acquires at least some knowledge of the science of biology.

We are displaying a woeful lack of vision in the way we fumble with the eternal laws of life.  It is not enough that we now hopefully create a setup permitting men to give allegiance with their minds or to serve faithfully with their bodies.  We must someday face the truth that man is inevitably and incurably an idealist;  for this is the truth that will set us free.  Man's need is for the idealistic content of his nature to be properly nourished; then his whole consciousness will impel him to right action -and then no more will our laws fail, treaties be broken, and the rights of man stand violated.

The American nation desperately needs a vision of its own purpose.  It must conceive it in a gen苟rous idealism, great and strong enough to bind thoughtless and selfish persons to something bigger than themselves.  It must recognize that it is in the intangible ideal that the foundations are laid for all seeable good, must know that the truly prac負ical course and the course of hard realism for America is the one that is laid basically in a generous idealism.

This is more than an indicated course.  It is one that we inevitably must follow, guided by the hand of destiny.

Believing this to be so, I dedicate this book to the proposition that American Democracy is part of a Universal Plan.

Our world is ruled by inflexible laws which con負rol not only the motions of the heavenly bodies but the consequences of human conduct.  These Uni赳ersal motions, interpreted politically, are impelling human society out of a state of autocracy and tyran要y to democracy and freedom.  This motion is inevitable, for the growth of humans is a gradual development of mind over matter, and the motion itself represents the natural and reasonable unfold衫ent of the potentials within human character.

Those who attempt to resist this motion destroy themselves.  To cooperate with this motion, and to assist Nature in every possible way to the accom計lishment of its inevitable purpose, is to survive.

Thousands of years before the beginning of the Christian era many enlightened thinkers discov苟red the will of God as expressed through Nature in the affairs of men.  They made known their discoveries in terms of religions, philosophies, sciences, arts, and political systems.  These first statements are now the admired monuments of ancient learning.  Available to men of today, they are generally ignored.

Years of research among the records of olden peoples available in libraries, museums, and shrines of ancient cultures, has convinced me that there exists in the world today and has existed for thou貞ands of years, a body of enlightened humans un虹ted in what might be termed, an Order of the Quest.  It is composed of those whose intellectual and spiritual perceptions have revealed to them that civilization has a Secret Destiny--secret, I say, because this high purpose is not realized by the many;  the great masses of peoples still live along without any knowledge whatsoever that they are part of a Universal Motion in time and space.

Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Buddha, Jesus, and Mohammed are among the greatest names re苞orded in history; but it is not customary to re茆ard the men who bore these names as statesmen or sociologists.  They are thought of as philos觔phers, sages, seers, and mystics, whose doctrines have no application to the political needs of an industrial civilization.  Yet it is men like Plato and Buddha who still exercise the most powerful force in mortal affairs toward the perpetuation and pre貞ervation of a civilized state among all nations.

All of the great leaders of ancient times realized and taught that the establishment of a state of per衫anent peace among the nations depended upon the release of human ideals, but through properly trained and disciplined minds capable of interpret虹ng these ideas in terms of the common good.

World democracy was the secret dream of the great classical philosophers.  Toward the accom計lishment of this greatest of all human ends, they outlined programs of education, religion, and so苞ial conduct directed to the ultimate achievement of a practical and universal brotherhood.  And in order to accomplish their purposes more effectively, these ancient scholars bound themselves with cer負ain mystic ties into a broad confraternity.  In Egypt, Greece, India, and China, the State Mys負eries came into existence.  Orders of initiated priest計hilosophers were formed as a sovereign body to instruct, advise, and direct the rulers of the States.

Thousands of years ago, in Egypt, these mystical orders were aware of the existence of the western hemisphere and the great continent which we call America.  The bold resolution was made that this western continent should become the site of the philosophic empire.  Just when this was done it is impossible now to say, but certainly, the decision was reached prior to the time of Plato, for a thinly veiled statement of this resolution is the substance of his treatise on the Atlantic Islands.

One of the most ancient of man's constructive ideas is the dream of a universal democracy and a cooperation of all nations in a commonwealth of States.  The mechanism for the accomplishment of this ideal was set in motion in the ancient temples of Greece, Egypt, and India.  So brilliant was the plan and so well was it administrated that it has survived to our time, and it will continue to function until the great work is accomplished.

Philosophy set up its house in the world to free men by freeing them of their own inordinate de貞ires and ambitions.  It saw selfishness as the greatest crime against the common good, for selfishness is natural to all who are untutored.  It recognized that the mind has to be trained in the laws of thinking before men can be capable of self-ruler貞hip.  And it knew that the democratic common趴ealth can be a reality only when our world is a world of self-ruling men.

And so it is from the remote past, from the deep shadows of the medieval world as well as from the early struggles of more modern times, that the power of American democracy has come.  But we are only on the threshold of the democratic state.  Not only must we preserve that which we have gained through ages of striving, we must also per苯ect the plan of the ages, setting up here the ma苞hinery for a world brotherhood of nations and races.
This is our duty and our glorious opportunity.

It seems to me that the basic plan for the post趴ar world should be one solidly founded in this great dream of Universal Brotherhood.  It is not enough to work on the problem solely in terms of politics and industry.  The formula must express a broad idealism, one which appeals to the finest intuitions of man, and one universally understand苔ble by all who have lived, dreamed, and suffered on this mortal sphere.



 


2.  THE WORLD'S FIRST DEMOCRAT

The leader who had the first social consciousness in the administration of a nation
was a Pharaoh of Egypt, Akhnaton. ... Born several thousand years too soon,
he was the first realist in democracy, the first humanitarian, the first internationalist. ...
He saw that the duty of the ruler is to protect for all the right to live well, to think, to dream, to hope, and to aspire. ...
For his dream of the Brotherhood of Man, he cheerfully gave his life.


Akhnaton, Pharaoh of Egypt, born 1388 B.C., was the first man in recorded history to exemplify social conscious要ess in the administration of a great nation. He saw every living thing as having a divine right to live well, to hope and to aspire in a world governed by brotherly love
MAN has passed out of the state of savagery and be苞ome a civilized creature with the development of social consciousness.  Civi衍ization is a collective state.  In our collective type of life, the isolationist is a detriment to himself and a menace to all others.

There is a great difference between isolationism and intellectualism.  Development of the mind re衍eases the individual from mob psychology, but it does not set him apart from the common respons虹bilities of his kind.  A true thinker becomes a force for good within the group life.  If his intel衍ectual powers lure him away from the practical problems and values of his world, he can no longer make his contribution to the social unity.

Political reforms are not accomplished by the people but through the people.  Behind all collec負ive progress stands the enlightened individual's leadership.  His superiority does not free him from common responsibility; he is the obligation to assume the greater burden of directing his vision to the well being of all his people.

Let us see how this works.  We'll go far back to ancient times.

Akhnaton, Pharaoh of Egypt, throned under the title Amen-Hotep IV, is often referred to as the first civilized human being.  While this may not be literally true, he was definitely the first man in recorded history to exemplify social consciousness in the administration of a great nation.

Akhnaton, the beloved child of the Aton, was born at Thebes about 1388 B.C.  Like most of the princes of his house, he was extremely delicate as a child, and it was feared that he would not live to reach the throne; as the last of his line, the dynasty would end with him if he died without issue.  For this reason, he was married in his twelfth year to a ten-year-old Egyptian girl of noble birth, named Nefertiti.

During the childhood of the young king, the Queen mother, Tiy, ruled as regent of the double empire.  She is believed to have been of Syrian origin, which would account for the many strange and un-Egyptian ideas in religion, government, and art which were developed during the reign of Akhnaton.  Queen Tiy, brilliant and capable, had recognized before her son reached his majority that in him were qualities more divine than human.  The son became the actual ruler of his country in his eighteenth year; his reign extended for seventeen years.

Akhnaton had been the ruler of Egypt only about two years when he opposed his will to the priest虐ood of Amon-Ra.  By attacking the oldest and most firmly established of all Egyptian institutions, the young Pharaoh created legions of enemies and brought down upon himself the wrath of the reli茆ion of the State.  He could scarcely have chosen a surer way of complicating the problems of his life.

In the midst of this conflict, he proclaimed a new spiritual dispensation, and to escape his enemies built a new capital city, one hundred and sixty miles up the Nile from Cairo.  His new faith was Atonism; and he named his city Khut-en-Aton--the Horizon of the Aton--and dedicated the city with these words:  "Ye behold the City of the Ho訃izon of Aton, which the Aton has desired me to make for Him as a monument, in the great name of My Majesty forever.  For it was Aton, my Father, that brought me to this City of the Horizon."

As High Priest of his new religion, Amen-Hotep IV changed his name to Akhnaton, because the older name included the word Amen, whose faith he had rejected.

Charles F. Potter, in his History of Religion, says of Akhnaton that he was, "the first pacifist, the first realist, the first monotheist, the first Democrat, the first heretic, the first humanitarian, the first internationalist, and the first person known to at負empt to found a religion.  He was born out of due time, several thousand years too soon."

From his twenty-sixth year to his thirty-first year, Akhnaton devoted his life to the perfection of his mystical doctrine in the city which he had built for the Ever-Living God.  Here he taught the mystery of the Divine Father and wrote the simple and beautiful poems which have endured and survived time.  To Akhnaton, God was not a mighty warrior ruling over Egypt, speaking through the oracles of his priests;  he was not a Supreme Being flying through the air in a war chariot leading armies of destruction.  Aton was the gentle father who loved all his children, of every race and nation; and desired for them that they should live together in peace and comradeship.

Even more, God, the Aton, had created all the lesser creatures, whether birds that nested in the papyrus reeds along the banks of the Nile or dragonflies with many colored wings that hovered over quiet pools and the lotus blooms.  The Aton was the father of all beasts, and fishes, and flowers, and insects.  He had fashioned them in his wisdom and preserved them with his love and tenderness.

Akhnaton, seated in the garden of his palace, spent many hours watching the flight of birds and listening to the voices of little creatures.  He tells us that he found the Aton in all of them and that his heart went out to them, and he gave thanks for the goodness in everything that lived.

This was a Pharaoh who traveled alone through the countryside, meeting the peasants, conversing with slaves, and sharing the simple food of the poor.  To the most ignorant man, he listened with profound respect, for in each of his subjects he sought and found the life of the Aton.  He saw the Universal God shining through the eyes of little children, beheld the beauty of the Aton in the bodies of the men who worked in the fields.  He could not understand why others did not see God in everything, as he did.

Like most of the great religious leaders, Akhn苔ton accepted the social problem of life as part of religion.  He could not accept the inequalities of birth, wealth, or physical estate as a justification for men persecuting each other or exploiting one another.  He saw every living thing has a divine right--a right to live well, to think, to dream, to hope, and to aspire.  He saw it the duty of the ruler to protect this beauty in the hearts of his peo計le, to nourish it, and to give every possible oppor負unity for its expression and perfection.

Religious intolerance was impossible among those who worshipped the Atan, and there was no room for political intolerance in a world governed by the laws of brotherly love.  Each man became the protector and comforter of all other men, cherish虹ng the dreams of others equally with his own.

In his personal life, Akhnaton emerges as the first man in history to bring dignity and gentle beauty to the management of his home.  He was the father of seven daughters, to whom he was completely devoted, and in his speeches and public pronouncements he always referred to Queen Ne苯ertiti as "my beloved wife."

It was usual for the Pharaohs to cause themselves to be depicted in great stone carvings upon the walls of their palaces.  They were represented as majestic figures, crowned and sceptered;  they were shown either seated on their thrones or wielding their weapons against their foes.  Akhnaton was the only Pharaoh in the history of Egypt who chose to be depicted with his arm about his wife, with his little daughters playing about and seated on his lap
As with the passing years the health of the Pharaoh grew worse, the opposition of the priest虐ood of Amon-Ra grew greater; and his reign was complicated by invasions by the Hittite nations.  The governors of various provinces pleaded with him for help, but Akhnaton would not send armies.

The dreamer king saw his lands pillaged and his cities conquered; but he would not kill his ene衫ies; they, too, were children of the Aton.

Akhnaton died in his thirty-sixth year, at the altar of the Aton in the temple of the faith he had created.  When his mummy case was found, the follow虹ng prayer to the Aton was discovered inscribed on golden foil beneath his feet.  "I breathe the sweet breath which comes forth from Thy mouth.  I behold Thy beauty every day .... Give me Thy hands, holding Thy spirit, that I may receive it and may be lifted by it.  Call Thou upon my name unto eternity, and it shall never fail."

In the words of the great Egyptologist, Professor Breasted, "There died with him such a spirit as the world had never seen before."

Akhnaton was the first man in history who dared to dream of the Brotherhood of Men, and he cheer苯ully gave his life and his empire for that dream.
He is indeed, "The beautiful child of the Living Aton, whose name shall live forever and ever."



Saturday, March 13, 2021

Dope, Inc. Britain's Opium War Against The U.S. By U.S. Labor Party Investigating Team; by Konstandinos Kalimtgis, David Goldman, Jeffrey Steinberg from Archive Website



by Konstandinos KalimtgisDavid GoldmanJeffrey Steinbergfrom Archive Website




PART I
History of Britain's First Opium Wars
 


              The Opium Wars (In Our Time)

Introduction

This is the setting for what follows below: narcotics are pouring in from abroad through a well-organized, efficient group of smugglers.

One-fifth of the population abuses drugs, an epidemic surpassing any known since the Great Plagues. Not only the poor, but the wealthy and the children of the wealthy have succumbed. Within the nation, organized crime displays its drug profits without shame, ruling local governments, and threatening the integrity even of national government. None of their opponents is safe from assassins, not even the chief of state. Law enforcement is in shambles. The moral fiber of the nation has deteriorated past the danger point.

And one of the leading dope-traffickers writes to his superiors abroad, "As long as this country maintains its drug traffic, there is not the slightest possibility that it will ever become a military threat, since the habit saps the vitality of the nation." (1) 

Image result for Great Britain Opium wars

The description is familiar, but we are not writing of America in 1978, but China in 1838, on the eve of the first Opium War, when Great Britain landed troops to compel China to ingest the poison distributed by British merchants.

An American President lies dead of an assassin's bullet.

Corrupt members of the Cabinet cover the tracks leading to a conspiracy, including the leading narcotics mobs, ethnic-based secret societies, and a foreign government. The public does not believe that the assassin acted alone, but the weight of the cover-up, the silence of the leading press, and the deaths of witnesses blur the trail from the public’s view.

Was that the death of John F. Kennedy? It was also the death of Abraham Lincoln.

During the last century, British finance protected by British guns controlled the world narcotics traffic. The names of the families and institutions are known to the history student: Matheson, Keswick, Swire, Dent, Baring, and Rothschild; Jardine Matheson, the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, the Chartered Bank, the Peninsular and Orient Steam Navigation Company. Britain’s array of intelligence fronts ran a worldwide assassination bureau, operating through occult secret societies: the Order of Zion, Mazzini’s Mafia, the “Triads” or Societies of Heaven in China.

Paging back over the records of the narcotics traffic and its wake of corruption and murder, the most uncanny feature of the opium-based Pax Britannica is how shamelessly, how publicly the dope-runners operated.

Opium trading, for the British, was not a sordid backstreet business, but an honored instrument of state policy, the mainstay of the Exchequer, the subject of encomia from Britain’s leading apostles of “Free Trade” - Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Thomas Malthus, James Mill, and John Stuart Mill. The poisoning of China, and later the post-Civil War United States, did not lead to prison but to peerages.

Great sectors of the Far East became devoted to the growing of the opium poppy, to the exclusion of food crops, to the extent that scores of millions of people depended utterly on the growing, distribution and consumption of drugs.

The Keswicks, Dents, Swires and Barings still control the world flow of opiates from their stronghold in the British Crown Colony of Hong Kong. Jardine Matheson, the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, and the Peninsular and Orient Steam Navigation Company still control the channels of production and distribution of the drugs from the Far East, through the British dominion of Canada, into the United States.

By an uninterrupted chain of succession, the descendants of the Triads, the Mafia, and the Order of Zion still promote drug traffic, dirty money transfers, political corruption, and an Assassination Bureau even more awesome than the conspiracy that claimed Abraham Lincoln's life. Of course, the drug revenues of this machine are no longer tallied in the published accounts of the British Exchequer.

But the leading installations of the drug traffic are no more hidden than they were a hundred years ago. From the Crown Colony of Hong Kong, the "HongShangBank (a.k.a. Hong Kong & Shangai Bank) does what the Keswicks set it up to do: provide centralized rediscounting facilities for the financing of the drug trade. Even the surnames of senior management are the same.

Even today, the grand old names of Prohibition liquor and dope-running rouse the deep awareness of Americans: Bronfman, Kennedy, Lansky. Are the denizens of the India opium trade, of the Prohibition mob, imprisoned in the history books and behind the movie screen?

Not infrequently, the observer feels a momentary lapse in time, and sees not a history book, but the morning newspaper, not the late-night movie, but the evening television newscast.

The story we have to tell happened twice. It first happened to China, and now it is happening to the United States.

Emphasizing that neither the names nor the hangouts of the criminals have changed, we begin by telling how it happened the first time.

Back to Contents

When Britain was the largest drug dealer in the World



1 - Britain's First Opium Wars
From 1715, when the British East India Company opened up its first Far East office in the Chinese port city of Canton, it has been official British Crown policy to foster mass-scale drug addiction against targeted foreign populations in order to impose a state of enforced backwardness and degradation, thereby maintaining British political control and looting rights.

While the methods through which the British have conducted this Opium War policy have shifted over the intervening 250 years, the commitment to the proliferation of mind-destroying drugs has been unswerving.

It was the British Crown's categorical opposition to and hatred for scientific and technological progress that led it to adopt an Opium War policy during the last decade of the 18th century. Having stifled the development of domestic manufacturing during the previous century, the British Crown found its treasury rapidly being drained of silver reserves - the only payment the Chinese Emperor would accept in exchange for silk, tea, and other commodities Britain imported.

Image result for Great Britain Opium wars

To reverse the silver exodus, which threatened to collapse the financial underpinnings of the British Empire, King George III mandated the East India Company to begin shipping large quantities of opium from Bengal in the British Crown Colony of India into China. The dual objective was to favorably alter the balance-of-payments deficit and to foster drug addiction among China's mandarin class.

By the time of the American Revolution, East India Company opium trafficking into China was officially reported to be at a scale 20 times the absolute limit of opium required for medical and related use.

In a very direct sense, the Founding Fathers of the United States fought the American Revolution against the British Crown's opium policy.
  • East India Company intelligence operative Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations spelled out the colonial looting policy against which the Founding Fathers rebelled. In that same document - as part of the same scheme to defend the Empire - Smith advocated a massive increase of East India Company opium exporting into China. (2)
     
  • The dirty money culled from that opium trade made up a sizable portion of the war chest that financed Britain's deployment of Hessian mercenaries into North America to attempt to crush the rebellion.
     
  • The "Secret Committee" of the East India Company - under the direction of Lord Shelburne and company chairman George Baring - coordinated British secret intelligence's campaign of subversion and economic warfare against the newly constituted American republic even before the ink had dried on the Treaty of Paris (1783). (3)
After the American Revolution, Smith's call for a dramatic increase in opium exporting into China was enacted with a vengeance.

From 1801 to 1820, official British figures placed the opium trade at approximately 5,000 chests per year. By the late 1820s, a network of trading companies operating under overall East India Company "market control" was founded to facilitate the trade. Some of these British opium houses, including the biggest, Jardine Matheson & Co. Ltd., maintain an active hand in Far East heroin trafficking to this day.

The establishment of these trading companies - the core of Britain's Opium War infrastructure - fostered an epidemic- scale increase in opium trafficking into China. By 1830-31, the number of chests of opium brought into China increased fourfold to 18,956 chests. In 1836, the figure exceeded 30,000 chests. In financial terms, trade figures made available by both the British and Chinese governments showed that between 1829-1840, a total of 7 million silver dollars entered China, while 56 million silver dollars were sucked out by the soaring opium trade. (4)

When the Chinese Emperor, confronted by a galloping drug addiction crisis, tried to crack down on the British trading companies and their dope smugglers, the British Crown went to war. 

Image result for Great Britain Opium wars

In 1839, the Chinese Emperor appointed Lin Tse-hsu Commissioner of Canton to lead a campaign against opium. Lin launched a serious crackdown against the Triad gangs sponsored by the British trading companies to smuggle the drugs out of the "Factory" area into the pores of the communities. The Triad Society, also known as the "Society of Heaven and Earth," was a century-old feudalist religious cult that had been suppressed by the Manchu Dynasty for its often violent opposition to the government's reform programs.

The Triad group in Canton was profiled and cultivated by Jesuit and Church of England missionaries and recruited into the East India Company's opium trade by the early 19th century. (5)

When Lin moved to arrest one of the British nationals employed through the opium merchant houses, Crown Commissioner Capt. Charles Elliot intervened to protect the drug smuggler with Her Majesty's fleet. And when Lin responded by laying siege to the factory warehouses holding the tea shipments about to sail for Britain until the merchants turned over their opium stockpiles, Elliot assured the British drug pushers that the Crown would take full responsibility for covering their losses.

The British Crown had its "casus belli."

Matheson of the opium house Jardine Matheson joyously wrote his partner Jardine - then in London, conferring with Prime Minister Palmerston on how to pursue the pending war with China:
. . . the Chinese have fallen into the snare of rendering themselves directly liable to the Crown. To a close observer, it would seem as if the whole of Elliot's career was expressly designed to lead on the Chinese to commit themselves, and produce a collision. Matheson concluded the correspondence: "I suppose war with China will be the next step." (6)
Indeed, on October 13, 1839, Palmerston sent a secret dispatch to Elliot in Canton informing him that an expeditionary force proceeding from India could be expected to reach Canton by March, 1840. In a follow-up secret dispatch dated November 23, Palmerston provided detailed instructions on how Elliot was to proceed with negotiations with the Chinese - once they had been defeated by the British fleet.

Palmerston's second dispatch was, in fact, modeled on a memorandum authored by Jardine dated October 26, 1839, in which the opium pusher demanded: 1) full legalization of opium trade into China; 2) compensation for the opium stockpiles confiscated by Lin to the tune of £2 million; and 3) territorial sovereignty for the British Crown over several designated off-shore islands. In a simultaneous memorandum to the Prime Minister, Jardine placed J&M's entire opium fleet at the disposal of the Crown to pursue war against China. (7)

The Chinese forces, decimated by ten years of rampant opium addiction within the Imperial Army, proved no match for the British.

The British fleet arrived in force and laid siege in June of 1840. While it encountered difficulties in Canton, its threat to the northern cities, particularly Nanking, forced the Emperor to terms. Painfully aware that any prolonged conflict would merely strengthen Britain's bargaining position, he petitioned for a treaty ending the war.

When Elliot forwarded to Palmerston a draft Treaty of Chuenpi in 1841, the Prime Minister rejected it out of hand, replying, "After all, our naval power is so strong that we can tell the Emperor what we mean to hold, rather than what he should say he would cede." Palmerston ordered Elliot to demand "admission of opium into China as an article of lawful commerce," increased indemnity payment, and British access to several additional Chinese ports. (8)

The Treaty of Nanking, signed in 1842, brought the British Crown an incredible sum of $21 million in silver - as well as extraterritorial control over the "free port" of Hong Kong - which to this day is the capital of Britain's global drug-running.

The First Opium War defined the proliferation of and profiteering from mind-destroying drugs as a cornerstone of British Imperial policy. Anyone who doubts this fact need only consider this policy statement issued by Lord Palmerston in a January 1841 communiqué to Lord Auckland, then Governor General of India:
The rivalship of European manufactures is fast excluding our productions from the markets of Europe, and we must unremittingly endeavor to find in other parts of the world new vents for our industry (i.e., opium - ed.). . . If we succeed in our China expedition, Abyssina, Arabia, the countries of the Indus and the new markets of China will at no distant period give us a most important extension to the range of our foreign commerce. . . . (9)
It is appropriate to conclude this summary profile of Britain's first Opium War by quoting from the 15th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, published in 1977.

What the brief biographical sketch of Lin Tse-hsu - the leader of the Chinese Emperor's fight to defeat British drugging of the Chinese population - makes clear to the intelligent reader is that British policy to this day has not changed one degree:
... he (Lin—ed.) did not comprehend the significance of the British demands for free trade and international equality, which were based on their concept of a commercial empire. This concept was a radical challenge to the Chinese world order, which knew only an empire and subject peoples.

... In a famous letter to Queen Victoria, written when he arrived in Canton, Lin asked if she would allow the importation of such a poisonous substance into her own country, and requested her to forbid her subjects to bring it into his. Lin relied on aggressive moral tone; meanwhile proceeding relentlessly against British erchants, in a manner that could only insult their overnment.


Britain's opium diplomacy

Not a dozen years would pass from the signing of the Treaty of Nanking before the British Crown would precipitate its second Opium War offensive against China, with similar disastrous consequences for the Chinese and with similar monumental profits for London's drug-pushers.

Out of the second Opium War (1858-1860), the British merchant banks and trading companies established the Hong Kong & Shanghai Corporation, which to this day serves as the central clearinghouse for all Far Eastern financial transactions relating to the black market in opium and its heroin derivative.

Furthermore, with the joint British-French siege of Peking during October 1860, the British completed the process of opening up all of China. Lord Palmerston, the High Priest of the Scottish Rites, had returned to the Prime Ministership in June 1859 to launch the second war and thereby fulfill the "open China" policy he had outlined 20 years earlier.

Like the 1840 invasion of Canton, the second Opium War was an act of British imperial aggression - launched on the basis of the first flimsy pretext that occurred. Just prior to his ordering of a northern campaign against Peking (which permitted the British to maintain uninterrupted opium trafficking even while a state of war was underway), Lord Palmerston wrote to his close collaborator Foreign Secretary Lord John Russell (grandfather and guardian of the evil Lord Bertrand Russell).

"We must in some way or other make the Chinese repent of the outrage," wrote Palmerston, referring to the defeat suffered by a joint British-French expeditionary force at Taku Forts in June 1859. The expeditionary fleet, acting on orders to seize the forts, had run aground in the mud-bogged harbor and several hundred sailors attempting to wade to shore through the mud were either killed or captured. "We might send a military-naval force to attack and occupy Peking," Palmerston continued. (10)

Following Palmerston's lead, The Times of London let loose a bloodcurdling propaganda campaign:
England, with France, or England without France if necessary. . . shall teach such a lesson to these perfidious hordes that the name of Europe will hereafter be a pass- port of fear, if it cannot be of love throughout their land. (11)
In October 1860 the joint British-French expeditionary force laid siege to Peking. The city fell within a day with almost no resistance. Despite French protests, British commander Lord Elgin ordered the temples and other sacred shrines in the city sacked and burned to the ground - as a show of Britain's absolute contempt for the Chinese.

Within four years of the signing of the Treaty of Tientsin (October 25, 1860), Britain was in control of seven eighths of the vastly expanded trade into China. This trade amounted to over £20 million in 1864 alone. Over the next 20 years, the total opium export from India - the overwhelming majority of which was still funneled into China - skyrocketed from 58,681 chests in 1860 to 105,508 chests in 1880. (12)

Furthermore, the opening of China prompted the British opium traders to diversify into "legitimate business." The opium firms opened cotton traffic into China - to the point that cotton cloth shipments into China (like the opium shipments) quadrupled from 1856-1880 from 115 million yards of cloth to 448 million yards.

The London opium traffickers' diversification into the cotton trade at the close of the second Opium War intersected with the same London oligarchy's shifting of its principal strategic policy focus to the destruction of the United States - beginning with the efforts to wreck the republic via the British-sponsored Civil War.

The massive expansion of cotton exporting was undertaken with full knowledge that U.S. cotton production - centered in the Deep South slavocracy - would be severely disrupted with the pending "civil war" destabilization in North America. (13)

The slave and cotton trade in the South was run to a significant degree by the same Scottish-based families that also ran the opium traffic in the orient. The Sutherland family, which was one of the largest slave and cotton traders in the South, were first cousins of the Matheson family of Jardine Matheson. The Barings, who founded the Peninsular & Orient Steamship Line heavily involved in the opium trade, had been the largest investors in U.S. clipper shipping from the time of the American Revolution. The Rothschild family as well as their later "Our Crowd" New York Jewish banking cousins, the Lehmans of Lehman Bros., all made their initial entry into the United States through the pre-Civil War cotton and slave trade.

In the case of the U.S. Civil War, the British opium traffickers bet on the loser. By the mid-1860s, cotton goods from the southern United States were back on the international markets, triggering waves of bankruptcies among London speculators who bet on dramatic inflation in the prices of Indian and Egyptian cotton. As in the period immediately following Britain's loss of its American colonies during 1776-87, the oligarchy turned to an expanded opium traffic to paste over the losses.

To facilitate the planned expansion of the opium trade, the British banking and merchant circle founded the Hong Kong & Shanghai Corporation in 1864. Almost simultaneously, the Matheson family founded Rio Tinto (now Rio Tinto Zinc), a tin mining venture in Spain which soon began shipping these ores as a method of payment for the opium.

Who founded the Hong Kong and Shanghai Corporation? The same circle of merchant banking, trading, and shipping families - centered around the British monarchy - who opened the East India Company's opium trade as an instrument of British state policy during the previous century.

The following points summarize British Opium War policy against China through the 19th century:
  • Open sponsorship of mass-scale opium addiction of targeted colonial and neocolonial populations by the British Crown
  • Willingness of Her Majesty's government to deploy military force up to and including full-scale conventional warfare in support of the opium trade
  • Build-up of an allied terrorist and organized criminal infra- structure employing revenues gained from opium trade and related black market activities

Protecting the opium market

Even through the early decades of the present century, Britain retained an open diplomatic posture on behalf of unrestricted drug profiteering.

In 1911, an international conference on the narcotics problem was held at The Hague. The conference participants agreed to regulate the narcotics trade, with the goal in mind of eventual total suppression. The success of the Hague Convention, as it was called, depended on strict enforcement of the earlier Anglo- Chinese agreement of 1905. Under that agreement, the Chinese were to reduce domestic opium production, while the British were to reduce their exports to China from British India correspondingly.

The Chinese, who had subscribed enthusiastically to both the 1905 and 1911 protocols, soon discovered that the British were completely evading both by sending their opium to their extra- territorial bases, Hong Kong and Shanghai. Opium dens in the Shanghai International Settlement jumped from 87 licensed dens in 1911 at the time of the Hague Convention to 663 dens in 1914! (14) In addition to the trafficking internal to Shanghai, the Triads and related British sponsored organized crime networks within China redoubled smuggling operations - conveniently based out of the warehouses of Shanghai.

If anything, British profiteering from the opium trade jumped as the result of the reversion to a totally black-market production-distribution cycle. Ironically, the legalization of the opium trade into China forced upon the Emperor through the Opium Wars had cut into British profits on the drug. Legalization had brought with it the requirement that the British opium merchants pay import duties, an overhead they did not have to absorb when the drug trade was illegal.

In yet another act of contempt for the Hague Convention, Britain issued a major new loan to Persia in 1911. The collateral on that loan was Persia's opium revenues. (15)

Even with the post-Versailles creation of the League of Nations, Britain flaunted its drug trafficking before the world community. During this period, Her Majesty's opium trafficking was so widely known that even the Anglophile U.S. newsweekly The Nation ran a series of documentary reports highly critical of the British role. (16)

At the Fifth Session of the League of Nations Opium Committee, one delegate demanded that the British government account for the fact that there were vast discrepancies between the official figures on opium shipments into Japan released by the Japanese and British governments. The British claimed only negligible shipments, all earmarked for medical use, during the 1916-1920 period; while the Japanese figures showed a thriving British traffic. When confronted with this discrepancy as prima facie evidence of large-scale British black market smuggling of opium into Japan, the British delegate argued that such black marketeering merely proved the case for creating a government owned opium monopoly.

As late as 1927, official British statistics showed that government opium revenues - excluding the far more expansive black market figures - accounted for significant percentages of total revenue in all of the major Far East Crown colonies. (17)
British North Borneo            23 percent
Federated Malay States      14 percent
Sarawak                            18 percent
Straits Settlements             37 percent
Confederated Malay            28 percent
In India as well, official Crown policy centered on protection for the opium market. According to one recently published account, when Gandhi began agitating against opium in 1921
. . . his followers were arrested on charges of "undermining the revenue." So little concerned were the British about the views of the League of Nations that after a commission under Lord Inchcape had investigated India's finances in 1923, its report, while recognizing that it might be necessary to reduce opium production again if prices fell, went on to warn against diminishing the cultivated area, because of the need to safeguard "this most important source of revenue."

. . . while the British Government was professing to be taking measures to reduce consumption of opium and hemp drugs, its agents in India were in fact busy pushing sales in order to increase the colony's revenues. (18)
Lord Inchcape - who chaired the India Commission which endorsed continued opium production in British India - was a direct descendant of the Lord Inchcape who during the previous century founded the Peninsular & Orient Steamship Line and subsequently helped found HongShang as the clearinghouse bank for opium trade. Through to the present, a Lord Inchcape sits on the boards of P & 0 and the HongShang.

In 1923, the British-run opium black market represented such a seriously perceived international problem that Representative Stephen Porter, Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced and passed a bill through Congress calling for country-by-country production and import quotas to be set on opium that would reduce consumption to approximately 10 percent of then-current levels. The 10 percent figure represented generally accepted levels of necessary medical consumption.

Porter's proposal was brought before the League of Nations Opium Committee - where it was publicly fought by the British representative. The British delegate drafted an amendment to Porter's plan which called for increased quotas to account for "legitimate opium consumption" beyond the medical usage. This referred to the massive addict population in British colonies and spheres of influence (predominantly in Asia) where no regulations restricted opium use.

The enraged U.S. and Chinese delegations led a walkout of the plenipotentiary session; the British rubberstamped the creation of a Central Narcotics Board designated with authority to gather information and nothing more; and the journalists stationed in Geneva henceforth referred to what remained of the Committee as the "Smugglers Reunion." (19)
A chest of opium in 1820 sold for $2,075 on arrival at the port of Canton. While this figure tended to drop marginally as the volume of traffic increased after 1830, any calculation of cash valuation of the opium trade into China establishes a figure that very nearly parallels "the present $100-200 billion (when appropriate calculations are made to account for differences in purchasing power of the dollar in ratio to total volume of world production) in annual "black" revenues.
 



2 - Palmerston's Fifth Column,USA

The assassination bureau

Narcotics traffic was the business of organized crime during the 19th century no less than in the 20th, and Britain's Opium War cabinet spun out a web of criminal connections that crisscrossed the globe.

Prime Minister Palmerston conducted, the opium business behind a screen of respectability, in full public view.
What remained hidden - until the report of the Military Commission that heard evidence on the Lincoln Assassination - was the importance of Palmerston's secret life, as Patriarch of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.

It does not surprise the modern student that the perpetrators of the narcotics traffic show up in every element of the dirty side of 19th century politics, including presidential assassinations. But the extent of the web of criminal networks put in place by Palmerston could have come out of a Gothic horror story, American counterintelligence specialists of the time, such as Edgar Allan Poe and Samuel Morse (1), knew the problem well.

Palmerston's irregulars, employed in illegal dope trafficking, assassinations, and "Fifth Column" subversions against the United States in the period before and during the Civil War, are the linear ancestors of what is now called organized crime.
  • the Chinese "Triads," or Societies of Heaven;
  • the Order of Zion and its American spinoff, the B'nai B'rith;
  • "Young Italy," whose Sicilian law enforcement arm became known as the Mafia;
  • the Jesuit Order based in decaying Hapsburg Austria;
  • Mikhail Bakunin's bomb-throwing anarchist gangs;
  • nearly every other inhabitant of Britain's political netherworld...
...followed a chain of command that led through the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry directly to Lord Palmerston and his successors.

The model for the Scottish Rite operation is the ethnic secret society - Jewish, Italian, or Chinese. Closest to hand among Palmerston's agencies was the Order of Zion, a highly specialized dirty tricks operation founded by London-based Hofjuden ("Court Jew") families, whose close ties to the British oligarchy traced back to the founding of the Bank of England, and before that to an alliance with the piratical financiers of post-Renaissance Genoa.

The names of these families will appear and re-appear throughout this report, including the Mocattas and Goldsmids, gold dealers in London before even the Bank of England was there, now the operators of one of the world's most sophisticated money-laundering devices; the Montefiores, now central figures in the modern Most Venerable Order of St. John of Jerusalem; and the de Hirsch family, whose tightly controlled colonization program for Jews in Canada brought the present leaders of organized crime to the New World.

Control over the Order of Zion rested in the British Board of Deputies, founded in 1763 and still in action. One of the board's earliest presidents was Sir Moses Montefiore, described in contemporary accounts as "Queen Victoria's favorite Jew." (2)