The Good The Bad and The Ugly

Showing posts with label WWIII. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WWIII. Show all posts

Monday, October 10, 2022

Update :12/16/22 Archbishop Viganò’s Attempt to Justify Putin’s War on Ukraine Runs Counter the Fatima Message and “We Are Facing a Global Coup that Involves Both Civil Society and the Church” – Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

 

Archbishop Viganò’s Attempt to Justify Putin’s War on Ukraine Runs Counter the Fatima Message


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

by Luiz Sérgio Solimeo 

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò had a successful ecclesiastical career in Vatican diplomacy. His last assignment was the prestigious post of apostolic nuncio to the United States.

Once retired, he criticized errors in the Second Vatican Council and the Novus Ordo of the Mass. He also denounced the immorality of high-ranking prelates and disagreed with many attitudes of Pope Francis. These and other stands have made him a reference point for many conservative Catholics.

Archbishop Viganò is a cultured and intelligent man. He holds doctorates in Canon and Civil Law1 and is a trained Vatican diplomat. Accordingly, one could expect his continual and lengthy pronouncements to reflect the razor-sharp precision of a canonist and the prudent subtlety of an ambassador. However, for reasons that are difficult to understand, his more recent writings do not reflect a judicious tone. Instead, they increasingly resemble the rhetoric of a populist tribune in which emotional excitement prevails over the serene and well-reasoned analysis of facts and doctrine.2

It Is Not the West’s Fault that Russia Invaded Ukraine

His messages—always addressed urbi et orbi—deal with every topic of the day, from American presidential elections, when he “anointed” one of the candidates, to the pandemic, which he dismisses as “the Covid deception.”3

While His Excellency has the right to present his opinion on current events and problems, including Russia’s war on Ukraine, his thoughts are not always based on facts or supported by good logic. Frequently, fundamental premises required to form a correct opinion are absent from his analyses.

This paragraph from his recent “Declaration on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis” summarizes well what he sees as just motives for the invasion:

If we look at what is happening in Ukraine, without being misled by the gross falsifications of the mainstream media, we realize that respect for each other’s rights has been completely ignored; indeed, we have the impression that the Biden Administration, NATO and the European Union deliberately want to maintain a situation of obvious imbalance, precisely to make impossible any attempt at a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian crisis, provoking the Russian Federation to trigger a conflict. Herein lies the seriousness of the problem. This is the trap set for both Russia and Ukraine, using both of them to enable the globalist elite to carry out its criminal plan.4

The claim that the West has forced the “Russian Federation to trigger a conflict,” that is, the brutal invasion, is baseless. Neither the U.S., N.A.T.O. nor the E.U. made any threat to invade Putin’s Russia.

America Should Uphold Justice and Help Ukraine Against Putin’s ‘Unjust War’

For His Excellency, Putin was also forced to invade Ukraine by Jewish billionaires who sold their homeland to the corrupt Western world: “These Ukrainian billionaires wearing kippahs are those who are selling out Ukraine to the corrupted and corrupting West, trading their own well-being for the enslavement of their compatriots to the usurers who are taking over the world, using the same ruthless and immoral systems everywhere.”5

Putin, who spent his entire career in the fearsome KGB, does not hide his communist ideology. Speaking to some followers in 2016, he said he still has his Communist Party card and that “I still really like the communist and socialist ideas.” For him, such ideas are “like the Bible.” (“Putin Still Has His Communist Party Card, Likes Socialist Ideals,” AFP, Jan. 25, 2016, https://news.yahoo.com/putin-still-communist-party-card-likes-socialist-ideals-183734163.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall.)

Archbishop Viganò Disregards the Immorality of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Oddly, the learned and experienced archbishop fails to address the moral aspects of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The basic principles of natural law and Catholic doctrine on just war are ignored, and every attempt is made to justify the Russian invasion. However, the first thing a Catholic would expect from a bishop is guidance on what to think of this conflict from the perspective of Catholic morals. Is Russia morally justified in its war on Ukraine or not?

Unfortunately, the reading of Archbishop Viganò’s “Declaration” leads us to the sad conclusion that he does not offer principled guidelines in this moment of dark confusion. The populist rhetoric of the former apostolic nuncio is confusing and misleading the faithful—especially the conservatives who trust him.

Principles of Natural Law and Catholic Doctrine on Just War

To make up for the archbishop’s omission, let us recall some principles of natural law and Catholic doctrine on just war. Summarizing natural law and Catholic doctrine, Fr. Francisco de Vitoria, O.P. (1492–1546), considered “the founder of international law,” gives the reasons why war is just or unjust:

FIRST, differences of religion cannot be a cause of just war. . . .
SECOND, enlargement of empire cannot be a cause of just war. . . .
THIRD, the personal glory or convenience of the prince is not a cause of just war. . . .
FOURTH, the sole and only just cause for waging war is when harm has been inflicted. . . .
FIFTH, not every or any injury gives sufficient grounds for waging war.6

Saint Thomas Aquinas summarizes the requirements for a just war as follows:

— It must be declared by a legitimate authority.
— The cause must be just.
— It must be waged with good intention.7

Moreover, for a war to be just, there must be no other means of recovering a good unjustly appropriated by another nation, avenging a serious affront, or forestalling an invasion about to begin or one that has already begun. Additionally, all reasonable diplomatic means to resolve the dispute must have been exhausted before starting armed action.8

Natural Law and Catholic Morals Do Not Justify Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Theologians also highlight the principle of proportionality. Besides a just cause, a summons by legitimate authority, and an upright intention, there must be a proportion between the good to be recovered or preserved, the unjust situation to be remedied or prevented, and the evils that necessarily come with war, particularly the number of deaths.

As mentioned in a previous article, “The reasons alleged by the Russian autocrat to invade Ukraine do not pass muster. He failed to respect any natural law principles that justify the waging of war.”9

The Real Threat that Archbishop Viganò Does Not Seem to See

The mere possibility of the U.S., N.A.T.O. or the E.U. invading Russia in the future is not a just motive for Putin to invade Ukraine.

However, not only did Putin invade Ukraine for absurd reasons, but he also brutally threatened any country that, following the mandates of Christian justice and charity, wants to help Ukraine defend itself from the unjust attack. Pope Pius XII justifies such help.10 Here is the Russian autocrat’s threat: “Whoever tries to interfere with us, and even more so, to create threats for our country, for our people, should know that Russia’s response will be immediate and will lead you to such consequences that you have never experienced in your history. We are ready for any development of events. All necessary decisions in this regard have been made.”11

Is he suggesting the use of nuclear weapons?

“An Appeal to the Third Rome” Runs Counter to the Fatima Message

There would be many other things to say about the archbishop’s “Declaration,” given the immorality of Russia’s unjust war on Ukraine. However, his most serious flaw is the abandonment of the Catholic Church as the only hope for the world.

Indeed, the former apostolic nuncio seems to place his trust in the schismatic and heretical Russian Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, which he accepts as the “Third Rome.”

Russian schismatics consider Moscow the Third Rome and the Russian Church the true Church of Christ. According to them, the First Rome was the capital of the Roman Empire, the Holy See of Saint Peter, and the center of the Catholic Church. They claim that Catholic Rome fell into heresy and thereby lost its primacy, which passed to Byzantium, the capital of the Roman Empire of the East, and later Constantinople, which, they say, became the Second Rome. When this city fell to the Turks in 1453, the primacy passed to Moscow, the last and Third Rome, the center of the Russian Church, “which should inherit the prerogatives of the first and the second.”12

Devotion to the Heart of Mary Will Save the World

In her Fatima message, Our Lady said that Russia would convert to the Catholic Church. Archbishop Viganò seems to think the opposite, that the West and the Catholic Church herself will convert to the Third Rome, in other words, to schism and heresy.

That is absurd. It is shocking to see it being suggested by a Catholic bishop. Here are Archbishop Viganò’s words in full:

An appeal to the Third Rome

The world crisis with which the dissolution of traditional society is being prepared has also involved the Catholic Church, whose hierarchy is held hostage by apostates who are courtiers of power… Perhaps Providence has ordained that Moscow, the Third Rome, will today in the sight of the world take on the role of κατέχον  [Katechon] (2 Thess 2:6-7), of eschatological obstacle to the Antichrist.13 If the errors of communism were spread by the Soviet Union, even to the point of imposing themselves within the Church, Russia and Ukraine can today have an epochal role in the restoration of Christian Civilization, contributing to bringing the world a period of peace from which the Church too will rise again purified and renewed in her Ministers.14

The Russian Church’s Nationalism

Stefano Caprio, a priest and professor of Russian History and Culture at Rome’s Pontifical Oriental Institute, received this question from journalist Leone Grotti: “Why is the Russian Orthodox Church historically so tied to political power?”

Fr. Caprio answered: “It would take too long to give an exhaustive answer; let’s say they are together from the very origin of Russia. Even during the Soviet Union, when the Orthodox Church was persecuted, Stalin decided to dust it off during Hitler’s invasion to rekindle the patriotic spirit. Thus was born the Church of Stalin, a former seminarian who as a child dreamed of becoming the patriarch of Georgia. And Kirill, as a young monk, was raised by Stalin’s group of metropolitans.”15

Bohdan Oghulchanskij is a Ukrainian with “almost thirty years of experience of the priesthood, including a long tenure in the Moscow Patriarchate.” He shows the role played by the Russian schismatic church in Russian nationalism: “Religious exceptionalism, self-identification as ‘Holy Russia,’ ‘The Third Rome, and the Fourth cannot be,’ resided in the Russian religious consciousness. . . . [N]ationalism, as many researchers note, is very characteristic of Orthodoxy. . . . [I]n Russia, Orthodoxy has always been an instrument of the imperial state.”16

The Russian Church and the KGB

In 1992, Russian investigative journalist Yevgenia Albats published KGB: State Within a State—The Secret Police and Its Hold On Russia’s Past, Present and Future, a book based on documents from KGB archives (made available during the Perestroika years) and interviews with former secret police agents.17

The book shows how the communist regime’s secret police—under various names, but most famously as the KGB—is who held power in the Soviet Union. It infiltrated every sector, had discretionary power over people, was feared by all, and nothing was done without its assent. Dr. Albats writes: “[W]e must understand that the KGB was—and in a way still is—one of the most powerful and important components of the oligarchy that ran the USSR, and still runs Russia.”18

Contrary to popular belief, the KGB was not extinguished. It just changed its name. Dr. Albats continues: “It’s not that I think that these people are about to announce that communism is being restored. No, they’re more likely to install a Russian version, not necessarily extreme, of national socialism. Their ideology will be a mixture of Russian Orthodoxy and Russian nationalism. We’ve seen over the past couple of years how energetically the Orthodox Church has joined the secular political fray, gradually installing itself in the niche grudgingly abandoned by the Party.”19

Learn All About the Prophecies of Our Lady of Good Success About Our Times

Is this not what we are witnessing with Putin and his murky “socialist traditionalism,” being backed as he is by Kirill, the current “patriarch” of the Russian Church?

According to documents from KGB archives, Patriarch Kirill’s codename in the secret police was “Mikhailov,” and that of his predecessor, Alexy II, was “Drozdov.”20

Furthermore, the frightful Cheka, the first Bolshevik political police, already recommended in 1921: “Use the clergy themselves for our own purposes, especially those who occupy an important position in Church life, for example, bishops or metropolitans.”21 Albats states further: “According to Konstantin Kharchev, former chairman of the Council on Religious Affairs of the USSR Council of Ministers, ‘Not a single candidate for the office of bishop or any other high-ranking office, much less a member of the Holy Synod, went through without confirmation by the Central Committee of the CPSU [Communist Party of the Soviet Union] and the KGB.’”22

How can Archbishop Viganò place his hopes in a Third Rome that has served the KGB for so long?

“If They Do Not Stop Offending God”

There is no mention of Fatima in Archbishop Viganò’s “Declaration.” There is no mention of Our Lady either. Nevertheless, in Fatima, the Mother of God was very clear that wars are a chastisement for sin. She said: “The [First World] war will come to an end. But if they [men] do not stop offending God, in the reign of Pius XI a worse war will begin. . . . He [Our Lord] will punish the world for its crimes by means of war, hunger, and persecutions against the Church and the Holy Father.”

And the Blessed Mother continues: “To prevent it I will come to ask the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays. If my requests are fulfilled, Russia will convert and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, promoting wars and persecution of the Church. The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer and many nations will be annihilated.”

Our Lady ends her message with a promise of hope: “Finally, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me and she will be converted and the world will be given a certain period of peace.”23

Fatima: An Overview to Understand the Message

We must place our confidence in the words of the Most Holy Virgin, fidelity to the Catholic Church, and conversion to a virtuous life, never in a heretical, schismatic, and KGB-controlled Third Rome.

Let us pray for Ukraine. Let us pray for Russia. Let us pray for the world to convert. There is no hope outside of conversion and filial obedience to Mary Most Holy.

This article was already written when the Matt Fradd show interviewed Ukrainian Catholic priest Fr. Jason Charron. The pastor of Holy Trinity Ukrainian Catholic Church, in Carnegie, Pennsylvania, denounces and demolishes the fallacies in Archbishop Viganò’s “Declaration on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis.” The video interview is available on the site From Rome.24

The archbishop said in his letter that Putin has been cornered by an aggressive NATO, backed by the United States, which is seeking to escalate the conflict for its own gains. “This is the trap for Russia just as much as Ukraine, using both to allow a globalist elite to bring its criminal plot to fruition,” Viganò wrote.

So-called democratic states, according to Viganò, have imposed “censure and intolerance” over dissenting opinions. The pandemic has exacerbated this dynamic, the archbishop said, adding that global media outlets “shamelessly lied” with the cooperation of governments and the Catholic hierarchy.

The archbishop said in his letter that Putin has been cornered by an aggressive NATO, backed by the United States, which is seeking to escalate the conflict for its own gains.

Viganò said the “ostracism” of those who have opposed the administration of COVID-19 vaccines was similar to the treatment reserved for those who refuse to call Putin an “invader” or “tyrant.”

The Vatican has repeatedly dismissed objections to the vaccines based on their development or testing with stem cell lines originally drawn from aborted fetal cells. Pope Francis has joined global pro-vaccine campaigns, calling getting the shot “an act of love.” The Pontifical Academy for Life, a Vatican think tank charged with promoting life from conception to natural death, has come forward numerous times encouraging Catholics to get the vaccine.

Viganò adopted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s justifications for attacking Ukraine, lamenting the lack of media coverage of supposed neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine that have allegedly attacked Russian-speaking Ukrainians in the autonomous eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has ridiculed the idea that Nazism is behind the eight-year-old conflict in his country’s east, which Russia invaded in 2014.

The letter was the second defense of Russia’s invasion to be floated by a prominent churchman in recent days. In a sermon on Sunday, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church and an ally of Putin, repeated a long-held contention that the West wants to enforce the practice of holding gay pride parades as a test of loyalty to its values, which include the acceptance of homosexuality. The Ukraine war, he said Sunday, resulted from the eastern regions’ refusal to acquiesce.

Viganò said the “ostracism” of those who have opposed the administration of COVID-19 vaccines was similar to the treatment reserved for those who refuse to call Putin an “invader” or “tyrant.”

“If humanity accepts that sin is not a violation of God’s law, if humanity accepts that sin is a variation of human behavior, then human civilization will end there,” Kirill said on the pre-Lenten celebration known as Forgiveness Sunday.

But Viganò sees a deeper plot to institute a new world order. Naming the United Nations, NATO, and the International Monetary Fund as well as the European Union and billionaire philanthropists like George Soros and Bill Gates, the archbishop identified a global conspiracy, initiated by an American deep state, to introduce a world government based on economic interests and progressivism.

Viganò portrayed Zelenskyy as an E.U. puppet, an affable outsider introduced to foment Ukrainians’ feelings against Russia.

“We Are Facing a Global Coup that Involves Both Civil Society and the Church” – Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

Tuesday, July 31, 2018

The Revolutionary War: How America Became A Jesuit Enclave and Jesuit Order All Roads Lead to the Black Pope

The Revolutionary War: How America Became A Jesuit Enclave

Image result for The Revolutionary War:  Jesuit Enclave and Jesuit Order All Roads Lead to the Black Pope


A most colossal conspiracy against the United States. I do not like the resurrection of the Jesuits. — Former US President John Adams, in 1816

Vatican Secret Societies Jesuits and the New World Order



By P. D. Stuart
We now come to another highly interesting portion of American history, which you would be hard pressed to find in the history books: the part played by the Jesuits in the American Revolutionary War-the War of Independence, 1776-1783.
We have seen the role of the Jesuits in the American Civil War.  But what part,, if any, did they play in the earlier war that transformed America from a collection of independent States to the United States of America?  The uninformed or partisan historians will tell us that this War was mainly, if not entirely, due to the arbitrary and “intolerable acts” of the British government, leading to the American Colonists desire to break with British rule.  I will now venture to shed some light on this dimly reported aspect of American history–and offer you a very different, and we hope more correct view.
That religion played a major role in the American Revolution is beyond dispute.  In 1776, at the time of the Declaration of Independence, there were little over twenty–three priests in all, and the next highest authority was the vicar apostolic in London, who had jurisdiction over the British colonies and satellites in America.  The American Revolutionary War of Independence soon changed that.
The reason there were so few Catholics and so many more Protestants was because of the foundation of the great democracy that is today called the United States of America was laid when millions of European Protestants fled the oppression of the Catholic Church in Europe to seek freedom of conscience and religion in the mostly uninhabited wilderness of North America.  In the main, the settlers were resolved not to duplicate in the New World what they had fled from on the old continent.  These settlers felt that the pope, as a foreign ruler. Should not be allowed to meddle in the politics or laws of America as they suspected that would render it difficult for immigrants, especially Catholics, to be fully loyal to the new country and to its fledgling republican values.
Naturally, there was a fear of Roman Catholics–not unlike the fear many Americans today have of Muslim fundamentalists.  After all, these early Protestant pilgrims had recently escaped the hands of their Catholic compatriots.  In those days people took their Catholicism seriously!  So much so that several states passed laws regulating the activities of Roman Catholics.  For example, in 1647 a Massachusetts statute declared that every priest was an: “incendiary and disturber of the public peace and safety and an enemy of…true Christian religion…”
The early American settlers suspected that the Pope was seeking to meddle in the affairs of the United States—to undermine its republican values—which they said was evidenced by the oath that every Catholic Bishop was required to take: “I will to the utmost of my power see out and oppose schismatics, heretics, and the enemies of our Sovereign Lord (the pope) and his successors.”  However, the period following the restoration of the Jesuits in 1814 saw a tremendous growth in their numbers and influence in America, as evidenced by a large number of Jesuit colleges and universities established on that continent in that century–twenty–two of the Society’s twenty–eight universities.
“In those days,” says historian Rene Fulop Miller, “one of Benjamin Franklin’s friend was a Jesuit; this was John Carroll, who had been brought up in Maryland of Irish parentage…He would later become the Archbishop of Baltimore, and go on to establish the Jesuit University of Georgetown, in “a suburb of the city of Washington, the federal capital…the first Catholic educational institution in the United States.  According to Robert Emmett Curran, in his The Bicentennial History of Georgetown University, the Society of Jesus “resolved in 1786 to found Georgetown (to supply for Catholics in the new republic the clergy whom the Society had provided previously).
John Carroll was born in 1735, at Upper Marlboro, Maryland.  After receiving a Jesuit education at Bohemia in Cecil County, Maryland, Carroll studied abroad at Jesuit colleges in Europe.  He was forced to flee Europe when the Jesuits were expelled from Sweden under the decree of Pope Clement, in 1773.  And on August 15, 1790, Reverend John Carroll was appointed the first Catholic bishop in the United States of America, being consecrated on the feast of the assumption.
Next, the British Parliament passed the Stamps Act, considered by the American colonists as another “intolerable act.”  But by far the worst and most notable of these “intolerable acts” was the Quebec Act (passed on May 20, 1774, it received the Royal Assent on June 22, 1774), which attempted to cede all of the territory west of the Appalachian Mountains and north of the Ohio River to Canada (which at the time was essentially Catholic Quebec).  In particular, the legislation purported to extend the Catholic province of Quebec south and west to the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, and into western colonies of Connecticut, Massachusetts and Virginia-taking land that many Protestant colonists had already claimed.
That this was a deliberately provocative Act–the legislative extension of the province of Quebec into so large an area of what was to become the United States is seen from the fact that Quebec, Canada’s largest province, is three times the size of France and seven times the size of Great Britain.  Thus, the Catholics of Quebec had more than ample land to expand within Quebec, plus the vast expanse that is Canada.
Further, and curiously, the Quebec Act of 1774 “established” Catholicism as the official religion in what was at the time “the British Colony of Canada.” And, in conformity with the practice in Catholic countries of the day, it provided for trials without a jury: denied representative assembly.  The simultaneous passage of the Quebec Act and the Coercive Acts by the British Parliament led the colonists to angrily declare that the Quebec Act an immoral pact between Britain and popery.
What is surprising about this is that the British, who were supposed to be Protestants, included a provision in the Act expressly providing for Canada to remain under the exclusive control of the Roman Catholic Religion and this provision was to apply to the newly ceded territory (i.e. all of the territory west of the Appalachian Mountains and north of the Ohio River). The terms included the stipulation that: “the exercise of the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman religion shall be maintained.”  This was most curious coming from a supposedly Protestant power!
The British-American colonist, mostly Protestants, were naturally outrage, declaring the law to be one of the most “Intolerable Acts” of the British Parliament.  Historian Martin Griffin writes that it caused a good deal of patriotic indignation, and was widely considered, by people on both sides of the Atlantic, to have contributed in no small part to the Revolution of 1776.”
The American colonists lambasted the Quebec Act; denouncing it and the attendant French Alliance as a dagger aimed at the heart; as a betrayal of their religious heritage; and a Trojan horse.  The colonists issued an “Address Written to the People of England,” in which they expressed: “our astonishment that a British Parliament should ever consent to establish in that country (Canada) a religion that has deluged your island in blood, and disbursed impiety, bigotry, persecution, murder, and rebellion through every part of the world.”
Indeed, we must question and regard as very suspicious indeed, the eagerness shown by a Protestant king (George III) to thus favor the Catholic faith, in one of its Protestant colonies, with so gracious a grant of American territory to Roman Catholics.
Another of the Intolerable Acts was the earlier Quartering Act of March 24, 1765, under which the King sent large numbers of British troops to Boston and then demanded that colonists must house them: in private homes if necessary, and feed them too; and if they did not do so they would get shot.  The reader will recognize that these Acts served no useful purpose to the Crown and were clearly inflammatory acts; meant to provoke a radical response from the colonists, as the certainly did.  It has been said that these “Intolerable Acts” were orchestrated by the agency of the Jesuits in England who had the ear of the King. Do you doubt this?  Read again this part Jesuit Oath of Induction (see again Chap 7, ante):
At the time, the papacy not only had to deal with the concerns of Americans that these revolutionary Jesuit outcasts were migrating to America, it also had to quell the fears of the American people that the Catholic Church in America was itself no more than a Trojan horse for the installation of a foreign ruler-the pope.  To overcome these suspicions, the Jesuit John Carroll, advised the pope to have the portion of the oath, which required allegiance to the pope, above all others, removed from the American Bishop’s pledge.  This was done to avoid giving offense to the principles of the Constitution and to the calm fears that the Catholic Bishops were merely puppets of the pope, on American soil.

“THE INTOLERABLE ACTS”

In order to achieve the objectives of the Roman Pontiff, the Jesuits aided by their Illuminated-Masonic vassals in America instigated the American War of Independence. Leading Masonic authors openly claim that Freemasonry had a preponderant role in the movement for independence.  The “Masonic Review” of 1893 goes as far as to state that Freemasonry was the driving force in the formation of the American Union in 1776, claiming that at least fifty-two out of the filthy-six of the “signers of the Declaration of Independence as members” of the Lodge.  Charles Carroll, John Carroll’s cousin, was a signer.
By encouraging Britain to effect into legislation a series of unreasonable and “intolerable acts” (the name given by American patriots to five laws adopted by the British Parliament in 1774), the secret operatives helped create a state of deep resentment and rebellion in the hearts of the American colonist.
One such “intolerable act” was a new government tax scheme on imports of tea.  This is what happened behind the scenes.  Two Scottish Rite Freemasons, Paul Revere, and another Masonic brother, Joesph Warren–one of George  Washington’s generals were members of the oldest Lodge in America, St Andrew in Boston.  George Washington himself was initiated into the Fredericksburg lodge in 1752.  This Boston lodge was based in the Green Dragon Tavern-remembered by some as the “headquarters” of the American Revolution.  The Boston Tea Party operated from the Lodge.  The Boston Tea Party opposed the new tax on tea imports and employed various means of civil and criminal disobedience, including the blocking of non –British ships to port.
( To Read the whole Article go to this Link: The Revolutionary War: How America Became A Jesuit Enclave)

Thursday, April 14, 2016

The Turning Point - Full Film



Published on Nov 5, 2012
Press For Truth Presents: The Turning Point
You have been selected to attend the 60th Bilderberg conference in Chantilly, Virginia from May 31 - June 3, 2012. This conference brings together leaders of business, economics, media, finance, politics and military in a forum which will allow for open and off the record discussions of current events and global issues.
I must stress that this meeting is SECRET and by invitation only. We operate under Chatham House Rules, meaning you are not permitted to discuss anything that is said during the conference to members of the media or otherwise.
Please keep all of your arrangements confidential, including all of the information included herein. In recent years we have lost much of our control over the dissemination of information due to the rise of independent media sources and internet-based journalists. We intend to correct this problem and plan to discuss it at this year's conference.

The Turning Point - A Press For Truth Production
Produced and written by:
Steven Davies, Bryan Law and Dan Dicks
Edited by Steven Davies and Bryan Law
Music by Dan Dicks

The Turning Point on DVD contains a behind the scenes look at the making of the film and the making of the soundtrack. We are releasing this film for free on youtube. We're offering a DVD to those who would like to support our work. We fully encourage you to make copies of the DVD to give to friends, family and strangers: https://pressfortruth.ca/top-stories/...

You can also support independent media by joining Press For Truth TV: http://pressfortruth.tv/register/
We rely on you the viewer to help us continue to do this work. With your help we can continue to make videos and documentary films for youtube in an effort to raise awareness all over the world.
As a Press For Truth TV subscriber you'll have full access to the site's features and content including Daily Video Blogs on current news from the PFT perspective and High Quality Downloads of all Press For Truth Films, Music and Special Reports! Subscribe to Press For Truth TV:http://pressfortruth.tv/register/

Charles E. Wharry (Darkbird18);
The Bilderberg Group have been in business since 1940's and we're just now waking up to the fact that we have lose control of our world and it have been that way for 100's of years! The video is showing us that the NWO, Illuminati and all Secret Society's are in control but guess what is the key figure behind all of this? The Dark one, "The Lord of the Air" and they'll warship him because they all believe that they will live forever, but Satan is a lyre and don't know the truth and the truth is not in him!

Sunday, January 10, 2016

ThreeWorldWars: The Planned World War 3 - A Play in Numerous Acts

The Planned World War 3 - A Play in Numerous Acts

Image result for ww3

World War Three in Brief

A Three World War scenario was developed several decades ago (see Conspiratorial History).  Two World Wars have already been achieved, and the Third and final World War envisions an attack on Iraq, Iran and/or Syria as being the trigger to set the entire Middle East into fiery conflagration. Once America is firmly entrenched into the Middle East with the majority of her first-line units, North Korea is to attack South Korea. Then, with America's forces stretched well beyond the limit, China is to invade Taiwan.  This will usher in the start of World War Three.

World War Definition:

What constitutes a 'world war'? How many countries need to be involved?  And who decides at which point a number of regional skirmishes can be grouped together and called a World War?  At the time, who called the official start of World War 1 and World War 2?
And have you noticed that although the term 'World War Three' is freely used in the alternative press and on the Internet, all the major news networks have stoically avoided using any phrase reminiscent of World War. 
Since it's difficult to find a definition for an event which has only happened twice in modern history, here's my attempt at an answer to the question 'what constitutes a world war'?
A World War is a military conflict spanning more than 2 continents, in which at least 20 major countries participate in an attack against a common enemy, and which has the attention of the man-in-the-street due to the significant loss of life.
With that definition, we can agree that WW1 and WW2 were in fact World Wars (both wars involved some degree of participation from most of the world's then existing countries: Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States and the Soviet Union).  We can also agree that we are very close to achieving World War 3.  The only requirement left to fulfill the start of WW3 is that of a military conflict spanning more than 2 continents.  As soon as Israel attacks Palestine, or North Korea attacks South Korea or the US, or China invades Taiwan, we will have the next World War well underway.

World War 3 Timeline

Image result for ww3
These are, I believe, the stages of the planned Third World War:
  • Prelude - The events leading up to the start of World War Three, including Sept 11, 2001.
  • Act 1 - The Middle East.  Widespread conflict to bring the entire region into the flames of war, possibly triggered by Iran or militants in Pakistan using North Korean supplied nuclear arms.  The first Scene in this Act is the US Invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003.
  • Act 2 - Israel at War -- Against her Arab neighbors, possibly Palestine.  A Palestinian State will be established, so that all Israelis will be fully separated from Palestinians (listen out for mention of a 7-year treaty to be confirmed by a World Leader - probably Bush), only for Israel to viciously attack Palestine shortly thereafter.
  • Act 3 - Far East -- "Hair-raising nuclear confrontation that threatens mankind's existence" - Peter Lemesurier, author of The Armageddon Script, p. 223, written in 1981.  Includes China invading Taiwan and a nuclear eruption on the Korean Peninsula.
  • Act 4 - Erosion of Confidence in 'The System' so severe citizens will be panicked into giving up liberties and Constitutional form of government.  The plan calls for the dissolution of the US Constitution, triggered by a significant enough 'terrorist' attack.  The ultimate intent is to introduce a global government and one-world religion.
  • Act 5 - The collapse of the US, and other Western economies and morals.
  • Act 6 - Significant population reduction using natural and man-made disasters.
  • Curtain.  Who can tell how this war will end?
Both Biblical prophecy and the Illuminati plan state that Israel is the key. The Third World War is planned to begin when Israel goes to war against her Arab enemies. Then, and only then, will all the other elements begin to occur and they will do so in rapid succession. The plan is to have one disaster following another in such rapid succession that, before people can mentally and emotionally handle one disastrous news event, they will be hit with another.  It is also accurate to say that until ALL of the elements for WW3 are in place, the plan will not commence.
While it would be naive to suggest a specific timeline for the events leading up to and including World War 3, we do know that the plans for World War 3 are well advanced, and our leaders involved in this secret plan are waiting only for the right signal before all-out war begins.
We are in the last stages of the preparation to so globalize the world that the Masonic New Age Christ (Antichrist) can appear to receive all the political and economic power of the world's rulers. This is the Illuminati plan and Biblical prophecy (Revelation 17:12-17).
In the words of Peter Lemesurier, author of The Armageddon Script:
"Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions.  The stage itself, albeit in darkness, is almost ready.  Down in the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up.  The last-minute, walk-on parts are even now being filled.  Most of the main actors, one suspects, have already taken up their roles.  Soon it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise.  The time for action will have come."
Ladies and Gentlemen, please take your seats and welcome on stage the players of this Grand Play:
World War Three!
Intro | Prelude | Act I | Act II | Act III | Act IV | Act V | Act VI

World War 3 Statistics

For a detailed look at WW3 statistics, including the running cost of World War Three, the number of lives lost and the countries involved in World War Three, please see our World War Overview.  Further details will be added as events dictate.
If you found this article interesting and want access to other carefully researched and well written articles, you might want to see what others are saying about the ThreeWorldWars newsletter.
Next:  How the  tragic events of 911 fit in with the planned World War 3.

Previous: The true cause of World War 2.

World War 3 - Before the Start



The events leading up to World War 3.

September 11, 1990 -- President George Bush [Senior] gives a speech to a joint session of the U.S. Congress entitled, "Toward A New World Order".
July 12, 2001 -- A full two months before the September 11 attack, a Russian expert, Tatyana Koryagina, "a senior research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic Researches subordinated to Russian Ministry of Economic Development", warned of an attack in America: "Besides bombs and missiles, there are other kinds of weaponry, much more destructive ones. . . . The U.S. is engaged in a mortal economic game … There is a shadow economy, shadow politics and also a shadow history, known to conspirologists. There are (unseen) forces acting in the world, unstoppable for (most powerful) countries and even continents. There are international, 'super-state' and 'super-government' groups. In accordance with tradition, the mystical and religious components play extremely important roles in human history. One must take into account the shadow economy, shadow politics and the religious component, while predicting the development of the present financial situation. Shadow financial activities of $300 trillion are hanging over the planet. At any moment, they could fall on any stock exchange and cause panic and crash...  The U.S. has been chosen as the object of financial attack because the financial center of the planet is located there. The effect will be maximal. The strike waves of economic crisis will spread over the planet instantly, and will remind us of the blast of a huge nuclear bomb." This speech has proven prescient, given the state of the global economy in 2009.
September 11, 2001 -- Eleven years to the day after President Bush's speech, the World Trade Center and the Pentagon are attacked.
September 13, 2001 -- Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz says the retaliation would be continued until the roots of terrorism are destroyed.  'These people try to hide. They won't be able to hide forever ... They think their harbors are safe, but they won't be safe forever ... it's not simply a matter of capturing people and holding them accountable, but removing the sanctuaries, removing the support systems, ending states who sponsor terrorism.'
October 11, 2001 -- Tom Brokaw announces the world now has formed into the New World Order.
October 26, 2001 -- President Bush signs legislation into law that gives Federal Government dictatorial powers and severely -- if not fatally -- erodes individual liberties and rights.
November 2001 -- January 2002 - Bush foreign policy and security advisers, including Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and Condoleeza Rice, say Saddam poses the greatest danger to the U.S. and should be the next target in the war on terrorism. Unnamed diplomatic and Pentagon sources say through press reports that the CIA and Defense Department are making plans for an Iraqi military campaign. The president remarks that Saddam will "find out" the consequences of refusing to allow United Nations weapons inspectors to return to Iraq.  [Sources: Washington Times, USA Today, New York Times and the Observer (U.K.)]
Dec. 5, 2001 -- Members of Congress John McCain, Richard Shelby, Jesse Helms, Henry Hyde, Harold Ford Jr., Joseph Lieberman, Trent Lott, Benjamin Gilman, and Sam Brownback send President Bush a letter urging military action against Iraq.
January 29, 2002 -- Bush, in his State of the Union Address, lists Iraq, Iran and North Korea as constituting an 'axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger'.
February 2002 -- Vice President Dick Cheney prepares to visit the Middle Eastern nations of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, and Kuwait, all of which border Iraq. On Cheney's trip Bush remarks, "There's nothing like looking somebody in the eye and letting them know that when we say we're going to fight terror, we mean it." Also in February on a trip to Japan, Bush reportedly tells the Japanese prime minister "We'll attack Iraq. We'll do it definitely."[Sources: The Guardian (U.K.), Kyodo News]
March 11-13, 2002 -- As Cheney travels on his Middle East trip, the leaders of Turkey and Jordan, two scheduled stops on the vice president's travel agenda, warn a U.S. attack on Iraq could destabilize the region. Cheney first arrives in London, where British Prime Minister Tony Blair pledges support for expanding America's war against terrorism to other nations. Jordan's King Abdullah meets with Cheney and states publicly that he does not support a U.S. strike against Iraq. [Source: Washington Post]
March 14, 2002 -- President Bush gives his first press conference since 9-11 and says, "all options are on the table," including nuclear weapons, to confront states that threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein "is a problem, and we're going to deal with him." [Source:Washington Post]
May 24, 2002 -- The six members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who are the highest ranking members of the U.S. armed forces, publicly criticize the president's desire for a swift strike against Iraq. The military commanders express fears that an early invasion would result in many American casualties, and that a cornered Saddam Hussein would not hesitate to use biological or chemical weapons. [Source: London Telegraph]
July 9, 2002 -- Bush tells reporters, "It is the stated policy of this government to have a regime change [in Iraq], and we'll use all the tools at our disposal to do so." [Source: Associated Press]
July - September 2002 -- On numerous occasions, former U.N. Iraqi weapons inspector Scott Ritter criticizes the Bush Administration for its Iraq policy. Ritter maintains that Saddam's military capability is negligible and Bush wants to invade Iraq for political purposes. [Sources: CNN, Washington Post, New York Times]
Aug. 18, 2002 -- Richard Perle is quoted in a Washington Post story by political reporter Dana Milbank headlined, "White House Push for Iraqi Strike Is on Hold." The subhead reads, "Waiting to Make Case for Action Allows Invasion Opponents to Dominate Debate." Perle says, "Timing is everything when you do this. If you launched [a public campaign] too far in advance and nothing followed, that would raise questions and fuel a debate that would not be helpful to the administration...If you join the debate now, but don't act for months, you pay a worse price."
Sept. 8, 2002 -- The United Kingdom's Independent reports "more than 100 U.S. and British aircraft attacked Iraqi air installations last week in the biggest raid for more than three years." [Source: The Independent (U.K.)]
September 12, 2002 -- Bush tells UN that Iraq is a "grave and gathering danger" and that the US "will not allow any terrorist or tyrant to threaten civilisation with weapons of mass murder".
Sept. 13, 2002 -- Reps. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., and Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, declare Saddam's efforts to amass weapons of mass destruction pose no immediate threat to the U.S., and Bush' real motive for a military strike is to make a grab for Iraqi oil. "Oil is a factor. How much [of a factor] is anybody's guess, but to discount it as a factor is, I think, misleading," said Kucinich. "It's not a conspiracy theory to bring it in because, after all, it is the second largest oil supply in the world." [Source: CNN]
Sept. 16, 2002 -- Nelson Mandela increases his verbal offensive against the Bush Administration hawks. "What right has Bush to say that Iraq's offer is not genuine?" asked Mandela. "We must condemn that very strongly. No country, however strong, is entitled to comment adversely in the way the U.S. has done. They think they're the only power in the world. They're not and they're following a dangerous policy. One country wants to bully the world." [Source: BBC]
Sept. 19, 2002 -- President Bush submits a draft of a congressional resolution authorizing him to take military action against Iraq. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., predicts Congress will vote on the resolution before November elections. The draft resolution says, "The president is authorized to use all means that he determines to be appropriate, including force, in order to enforce the United Nations Security Council resolutions [pertaining to Iraq], defend the national security interests of the United States against the threat posed by Iraq, and restore international peace and security in the region." [Source: Washington Post]
Sept. 24, 2002 -- Tony Blair unveils a dossier of evidence on Saddam Hussein's possession of weapons of mass destruction. The dossier, based on British and U.S. intelligence, was criticized for not revealing convincing evidence pointing to the need for Saddam's immediate removal. [Source:Associated Press]
Sept. 27, 2002 -- The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) announces that the Bush Administration cited a non-existent report said to be from 1998 on Iraq's supposed imminent nuclear capability. "There's never been a report like that issued from this agency," said Mark Gwozdecky, an IAEA spokesman. [Source: Washington Times]
Sept. 28, 2002 -- Up to 400,000 protesters march against war in Iraq in central London.
Oct. 1, 2002 (Time approximate 12:00 EDT)  - In Vienna, Hans Blix, the head U.N. weapons inspector, announces a tentative agreement with Iraq to allow inspectors to return beginning in two weeks. Search protocols of Hussein's Presidential palaces remain unresolved. Source: Washington Post]
Oct. 1, 2002 (Time approximate 16:30 EDT) -- Within hours of the Blix announcement President Bush reacts negatively to the agreement reached between Iraq and weapons inspectors. "We're just not going to accept something that is weak," he said. Bush urges the U.N. to "put some calcium in the backbone" of an alternative resolution for dealing with Iraq. On an alternative congressional resolution drafted by Senators Biden and Lugar of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bush says, "I don't want a resolution that ties my hands...What I won't accept is something that allows Saddam Hussein to continue to lie, deceive the world," Bush said. "I'm just not going to accept something that is weak. It's not worth it - the United Nations must show its backbone and we'll work with members of the Security Council to put a little calcium there, put some calcium in the backbone, so this organization is more likely to keep the peace as we go down the road." [Sources: Washington Post, Associated Press]
Next: Act I: Baghdad Invaded

Intro Prelude Act I Act II Act III Act IV Act V

World War 3 Statistics




World War 3 Planned by Albert Pike in 1871


For a detailed look at WW3 statistics, including the running cost of World War Three, the number of lives lost and the countries involved in World War Three, please see our World War Overview.  Further details will be added as events dictate.
If you found this article interesting and want access to other carefully researched and well written articles, you might want to see what others are saying about the ThreeWorldWars newsletter.
Next:  How the  tragic events of 911 fit in with the planned World War 3.

World War 3 - Act 1: The Middle East

Scene 1: Baghdad Invaded
Scene 2: 'Victory' Declared

Scene I: Baghdad Invaded

Image result for ww3

The initial 42 day war, waged strictly 'by the numbers'.
March 17, 2003 -- At 8:15pm, EST, President Bush announces a 48-hour ultimatum to Saddam Hussein to leave the country with his sons, or suffer the invasion.
March 20, 2003 -- US starts invasion of Iraq, exactly 555 days after September 11, 2001.
April 9, 2003 -- Coalition Forces seize control of Baghdad quickly and relatively effortlessly because Saddam orders a tactical retreat.
April 12, 2003 -- "In a unique meeting in St. Petersburg, Russia, the leaders of Russia, France, and Germany meet to deliver a very somber warning against President Bush. Russia's President Putin delivers the key summation: 'We are not going to export capitalist, democratic revolutions. If we do, we're going to end up on a slippery slope to non-ending military conflicts. We can't let that happen'."  Putin backs up his threat by deploying the Black Sea Fleet between Syria and North Korea, in Peter the Great Bay, and conducts aggressive sea, air and land exercises from April 15-21.
April 17, 2003 -- The US issues an impossible ultimatum to Syria demanding:
  • the release of all Weapons of Mass Destruction hidden by Saddam in Syria;
  • the return to Iraq of all officials of the Saddam regime granted asylum;
  • the disbanding of command structures of the Hizballah, Hamas, Jihad Islami and other Palestinian terrorist groups.
April 17, 2003 -- The United States bolsters its military presence near the Iraqi-Syrian border. U.S. officials say Central Command has ordered a build-up of assets in western Iraq. They say the build-up is centered at Al Rutba and includes M1A1 main battle tanks, AH-64A attack helicopters and A-10 ground-support fighter-jets.
April 17, 2003 -- Bechtel Corp., the San Francisco construction giant, wins a contract worth up to $680 million to rebuild Iraqi roads, schools, sewers and hospitals damaged in the war.
May 01, 2003 -- President Bush lands on the aircraft carrier, Abraham Lincoln, at 3:33pm to declare the major combat phase in the Iraqi War over, exactly 42 days after the war started.  In his speech he says, "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001 -- and still goes on... From Pakistan to the Philippines to the Horn of Africa, we are hunting down al Qaeda killers... The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror... Our war against terror is proceeding according to principles that I have made clear to all: Any person involved in committing or planning terrorist attacks against the American people becomes an enemy of this country, and a target of American justice. Any person, organization, or government that supports, protects, or harbors terrorists is complicit in the murder of the innocent, and equally guilty of terrorist crimes. Any outlaw regime that has ties to terrorist groups and seeks or possesses weapons of mass destruction is a grave danger to the civilized world -- and will be confronted."