by James Corbett
October 18, 2020
from CorbettReport Website
by Official Account - Plandemic Documentary Series
August 18, 2020
from BitChute Website
Information sent by Don Ferguson
Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, 'Plandemic II: Indoctornation,' tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic.
David Martin is the creator of the world’s first quantitative public equity index - the CNBC IQ100.
He served as Chair of Economic Innovation for the UN-affiliated Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization and has served as an advisor to numerous Central Banks, global economic forums, the World Bank and International Finance Corporation, and national governments.
Dr. Martin has pioneered global programs to bring corporate and stock market transparency to multi-national extractive industries and has been instrumental in bringing the world’s largest white-collar criminals to justice.
https://plandemicseries.com/
Gravitas: Pfizer's abusive vaccine deals
1976 Swine Flu Fraud - CBS 60 Minutes
Omicron 'Shocker': It's Mostly Hitting The Vaxxed
Registered nurse Nicole Sirotek shares what she saw on the front lines in NYC
A 'Disturbing Uptick' in Cancers and Viral Disorders | CLIP
Billions Took The 666 Billions Took The 666 Mark But You Didn't, take COVID_ Vaccine
WATCH: Prof Dolores Cahill – ‘Everyone Who Has Had an mRNA Injection Will Die Within 3-5 Years’
Insider trading in the US Senate
The "failure" of US medical intelligence
The shut down of the US' pandemic early warning system in September 2019
The record numbers of CEOs quitting their jobs
The Federal Reserve's moves in the Repo market in September 2019,
...and several other signs that those in positions of power knew that 2020 was going to be the year of COVID.
But April seems like an eternity ago and many more pieces of suspiciously predictive activities been dug up in the meantime.
So, in the interest of continuing this exploration, let's examine 10 more signs of plandemic foreknowledge...
1) Crimson Contagion
In 2019 the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) held a pandemic exercise called Crimson Contagion, which, the mainstream press notes, was "eerily similar" to the current scamdemic...
The exercise scenario envisioned a novel strain of pandemic influenza originating in China and being brought back to the US by international tourists.
So why did the exercise make it into the mainstream press at all? Because of Orange Man Bad (Trump), of course.
More specifically, it provides the "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US" cover story for this neo-9/11, subtly reinforcing the narrative by suggesting that COVID-19 is a real and existential threat to the US and that the valiant leadership of the HHS tried to warn the White House about PPE shortages and other preparedness shortcomings.
Extra points if you recognize this drill from my coverage of it in COVID-911 - From Homeland Security to Biosecurity.
2) Canada's Pandemic Warning System Shut Down Right Before COVID-19
Canada's international alert system for disease outbreaks - the Global Public Health Intelligence Network, or GPHIN, which, The Globe and Mail helpfully inform us, is "highly regarded" - was "silenced" by the Canadian government in early 2019.
And we all know what happened at the end of 2019...
This story once again serves to bolster the mainstream narrative by portraying the novel coronavirus as a real and existential threat that could have been prevented if only the government had plowed more money into its public health department and paid more attention to the epidemiologists (who, as we have seen this year, never get anything wrong).
3) "Simulation" of the Deliberate Release of a Lethal Respiratory Pathogen Planned for 2020
The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board is a body convened by the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO) that seeks to,
"ensure preparedness for global health crises"...
In their 2019 "Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies," they warned, apropos of absolutely nothing, of the,
"very real threat of a rapidly moving, highly lethal pandemic of a respiratory pathogen killing 50 to 80 million people and wiping out nearly 5% of the world's economy."
They also set a number of goals for 2020, including:
The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
But don't worry, guys! That's just a "simulation," and we all know that drills never go live...
4) The WHO Warns of "New Normal" of Pandemic Outbreaks... in 2019
Last June, Dr. Michael Ryan - the executive director of the WHO's health emergencies program - told BBC News that,
"We are entering a very new phase of high impact epidemics and this isn't just Ebola."
In case you didn't get the warning, he added:
"This is a new normal, I don't expect the frequency of these events to reduce."
Look out, folks, we've got a regular Nostradamus here.
Dr. Ryan, it should be noted, is the same WHO official who announced that the "new normal" of the COVID-19 era involves governments forcibly removing those suspected of infection from their homes and separating them from their families.
Oddly, he forgot to mention that part when speaking to the BBC last year.
5) A Comic Book Published by the EU Envisioned 'A Global Pandemic Stopped by the EU'
This one has to be seen to be believed:
What you are looking at is a page from 'Infected,' a comic book published by the EU Publications Office in 2012...
No, you read that right:
A comic book published by the EU Publications Office...
And what's the story of this comic book adventure?
During a tour of a P4 biosecurity lab in China, a time traveler from the year 2111 arrives to warn the assembled scientists that, in the future, a pandemic will ravage the planet.
In order to prevent the calamity, the time traveler provides the scientists with a some vials of biological material that he says will be necessary to "nip any pandemic in the bud."
Terrorists try to steal the material *blah blah blah*, man scratched by a monkey *yadda yadda*, global infectious outbreak *etc., etc.*, and then... (you guessed it!)... the EU saves the day through an unprecedented global health campaign dubbed "The Way Forward."
Yes, luckily for humanity, the EU-led "one health" approach saved us all from this "new era" of zoonotic pandemic outbreaks that we have just entered...
Personally, if I were a citizen of the EU I'd be upset that some portion of my taxes go toward paying for the production of propaganda schlock like this.
After all, these are the same people who produced the dumbest propaganda video ever.
Oh, and just for the record, although the imaginary P4 lab in the comic is said to be in "Beijing," China's first (and only) P4 lab is in fact in Wuhan.
6) COVID-19 Test Kits Being Sold in 2017?
The World Bank runs a website called the World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) that tracks global trade data by product using their "Harmonized System" (HS) tracking codes.
On September 4, 2020, they posted data on COVID-19 test kits that raised some eyebrows. You see, the website indicated that these COVID-19 test kits were being sold as far back as 2017!
Proof positive that the whole thing was planned years in advance, right?
Sigh...
A cursory glance at the data would give even the most credulous truther pause for thought about the significance of this "find."
If we were to take this posting at face value, then we have to believe that not only were 58 separate countries producing and exporting these COVID-19 test kits (meaning that tens of thousands of people would have been involved in their production, sale, shipping and storage), but that countries like Switzerland were producing over 2,000,000 kg worth of these kits (valued at a cool $23 billion) without a single person anywhere in this supply chain asking,
"What's COVID-19, anyway?",
...and not a single person coming out afterward to say,
"You know, I thought it was odd that we were exporting billions of dollars worth of these COVID-19 test kits, but it was even weirder when COVID-19 was identified and named three years later"...
Or, you know, the test kits were general medical test kits that were relabeled for COVID-19 use in April of this year and retroactively relabeled in the WITS system.
Because that's exactly what the fact checkers are saying...
And you know what? I believe them. ("Oooooooh, I just knew James was a globalist shill!" jeers the crowd.)
The World Customs Organization even announced the reclassification in April of this year.
This is another example of how poorly researched information gets passed around online so that the fact-checkers can arrive on their white horses and save the day by dispelling the obvious misinformation (Gates and the God gene vaccine at the CIA, anyone?).
So I don't consider this one plandemic foreknowledge at all, but thought I would throw it in to put the debunking on record.
7) A White House Advisory Group published a report on 'How a Pandemic Would Ravage the Economy'... in September 2019
In September 2019 the White House's Council of Economic Advisors published a report on "Mitigating the Impact of Pandemic Influenza through Vaccine Innovation."
The report warned,
"the potentially large health and economic losses in the United States associated with influenza pandemics," estimating that such a pandemic would cause "from $413 billion to $3.79 trillion" worth of damage to the economy.
And, as the title suggests, it argues that,
"[n]ewer technologies, like cell-based or recombinant vaccines" could help drastically mitigate that damage...
Unsurprisingly, the usual MSM presstitutes used the story to reinforce the narrative that,
pandemic diseases are the new normal, that the US is woefully unprepared to fight the war on the invisible enemy, and that investment in novel vaccine technologies can help save the country from economic ruination...
8) Central Bank Gold Repatriation
You might remember back in 2013 when Germany's Bundesbank issued a remarkable statement announcing that they would repatriate 674 tons of their gold holdings from the New York FED.
You may even remember that they specifically set a 2020 deadline for that repatriation.
But did you know that Austria's central bank followed suit in 2015 with an announcement that they, too, would repatriate the country's gold by 2020?
And did you know that the Polish central bank repatriated 100 tonnes of its gold from the Bank of England's vaults in a series of secret airlifts ending in November 2019?
All of these pieces of evidence led analysts like Ronan Manly to predict that,
2020 would be the year of the great "system reset," a transformation of the world financial system that would ultimately be used to usher in a new international monetary order...
This has nothing to do with a pandemic, of course, but then again, neither does the financial crisis we're living through.
The truth is that the current financial meltdown has been gathering steam for years and was well underway for at least a year prior to any of this COVID-19 hysteria.
"Following the money" to track down the real perpetrators of this crime seems as good advice for would-be scamdemic investigators as it is for 9/11 investigators.
Conclusion
As you can see, there were many different warnings that a pandemic emergency was set to take place this year.
As you can also see,
there is no "smoking gun" that proves anything specific about COVID-19.
Even worse, many of these "warnings" actually serve to bolster the narrative that this scamdemic really is an 'emergency' - one that we could have prevented if only we'd thrown more money at Big Pharma and given more power to the public health technocrats.
But such is the nature of these large-scale events.
Amateur sleuthers get caught up searching for the single, undeniable "smoking gun" and lose sight of the bigger picture.
The bigger picture here is that - exactly as demonstrated in,
...the groundwork for the emergence of the biosecurity state has been carefully laid over the course of the past two decades (at least).
From the passage of emergency health legislation to the creation of new pandemic preparedness offices to the signing of international health treaties, this medical martial law infrastructure has ensured that - regardless of whether it is real or fake, planned or unplanned,
any public health crisis could be used as the trigger for the beginning of the biosecurity era...
By all means, keep looking for that smoking gun (and, if you happen to find it, let me know in the comments below).
But unless we discuss What No One is Saying about the Corona Crisis and address the root of this new biosecurity paradigm, the bioterrorists will get away with their scam...
by Beda M. Stadler
July 01, 2020
from Weltwoche Website
translated by Back to Reason
July 01, 2020
from Medium Website
The coronavirus is slowly retreating.
What actually happened in the past few weeks?
The experts have missed basic connections.
The immune response against the virus
is much stronger than we thought.
The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th.
The author, Beda M. Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist, and professor emeritus.
Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland, he also likes to use provoking language, which should not deter you from the extremely important points he makes.
This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally.
I am advocating for local measures according to local situations. And I advocate for looking at real data rather than abstract models.
I also suggest to read to the end, because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2.
Why Everyone was Wrong
The Coronavirus is Slowly Retreating
by Beda M Stadler
This is not an accusation, but a ruthless taking stock [of the current situation].
I could slap myself because I looked at Sars-CoV2- way too long with panic. I am also somewhat annoyed with many of my immunology colleagues who so far have left the discussion about COVID-19 to virologists and epidemiologists.
I feel it is time to criticize some of the main and completely wrong public statements about this virus.
Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.
But let's look at this one by one.
1. A new virus?
At the end of 2019 a coronavirus, which was considered novel, was detected in China.
When the gene sequence, i.e. the blueprint of this virus, was identified and was given a similar name to 2002 identified Sars, i.e. Sars-CoV-2, we should have already asked ourselves then how far [this virus] is related to other coronaviruses, which can make human beings sick.
But no, instead we discussed from which animal as part of a Chinese menu the virus might have sprung.
In the meantime, however, many more people believe the Chinese were so stupid as to release this virus upon themselves in their own country.
Now that we're talking about developing a vaccine against the virus, we suddenly see studies that show that this so-called novel virus is very strongly related to Sars-1 as well as other beta-coronaviruses which make us suffer every year in the form of colds.
Apart from the pure homologies in the sequence between the various coronaviruses which can make people sick, [scientists] currently working on identifying a number of areas of the virus in the same way as human immune cells identify them.
This is no longer about the genetic relationship, but about how our immune system sees this virus, i.e. which parts of other coronaviruses could potentially be used in a vaccine.
So:
Sars-Cov-2 isn't all that new, but merely a seasonal cold virus that mutated and disappears in summer, as all cold viruses do - which is what we're observing globally right now.
Flu viruses mutate significantly more, by the way, and nobody would ever claim that a new flu virus strain was completely novel.
Many veterinary doctors were therefore annoyed by this claim of novelty, as they have been vaccinating cats, dogs, pigs, and cows for years against coronaviruses.
2. The fairy tale of no immunity
From the World Health Organization (WHO) to every Facebook virologist (sic), everyone claimed this virus was particularly dangerous because there was no immunity against it because it was a novel virus.
Even Anthony Fauci, the most important advisor to the Trump administration noted at the beginning of every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it.
Tony and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US, because we worked in related fields back then. So for a while, I was pretty uncritical of his statements since he was a respected colleague of mine.
The penny dropped only when I realized that the first commercially available antibody test [for Sars-CoV-2] was put together from an old antibody test that was meant to detect Sars-1.
This kind of test evaluates if there are antibodies in someone's blood and if they came about through an early fight against the virus.
[Scientists] even extracted antibodies from a llama that would detect Sars-1, Sars-CoV-2, and even the Mers virus. It also became known that Sars-CoV-2 had a less significant impact in areas in China where Sars-1 had previously raged.
This is clear evidence urgently suggesting that our immune system considers Sars-1 and Sars-Cov-2 at least partially identical and that one virus could probably protect us from the other.
That's when I realized that the entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity, but in reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement. That wasn't science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone.
To this day there isn't a single antibody test that can describe all possible immunological situations, such as:
if someone is immune, since when, what the neutralizing antibodies are targeting and how many structures exist on other coronaviruses that can equally lead to immunity.
In mid-April, work was published by the group of Andreas Thiel at the Charité Berlin, a paper (Presence of SARS-CoV-2-reactive T-cells in COVID-19 patients and healthy donors) with 30 authors, amongst them the virologist Christian Drosten.
It showed that in 34 % of people in Berlin who had never been in contact with the Sars-CoV-2 virus showed nonetheless T-cell immunity against it (T-cell immunity is a different kind of immune reaction, see below).
This means that our T-cells, i.e. white blood cells, detect common structures appearing on Sars-CoV-2 and regular cold viruses and therefore combat both of them.
A study by John P.A. Ioannidis of Stanford University - according to the Einstein Foundation in Berlin one of the world's ten most cited scientists - showed that immunity against Sars-Cov-2, measured in the form of antibodies, is much higher than previously thought.
Ioannidis is certainly not a conspiracy theorist who just wants to swim against the stream; nonetheless, he is now being criticized because the antibody tests used were not extremely precise.
With that, his critics admit that they do not have such tests yet.
And aside, John P.A. Ioannidis is such a scientific heavyweight that all German virologists combined are a lightweight in comparison.
3. The failure of modelers
Epidemiologists also fell for the myth that there was no immunity in the population.
They also didn't want to believe that coronaviruses were seasonal cold viruses that would disappear in summer. Otherwise, their curve models would have looked differently.
When the initial worst-case scenarios didn't come true anywhere, some now still cling to models predicting a second wave.
Let's leave them their hopes:
I've never seen a scientific branch that manoeuvred itself so much into the offside.
I have also not yet understood why epidemiologists were so much more interested in the number of deaths, rather than in the numbers that could be saved.
4. Immunology of common sense
As an immunologist, I trust a biological model, namely that of the human organism, which has built a tried and tested, adaptive immune system.
At the end of February, driving home from the recording of [a Swiss political TV debate show], I mentioned to Daniel Koch [former head of the Swiss federal section "Communicable Diseases" of the Federal Office of Public Health] that I suspected,
there was a general immunity in the population against Sars-Cov-2.
He argued against my view.
I later defended him anyway, when he said that children were not a driving factor in the spread of the pandemic.
He suspected that children didn't have a receptor for the virus, which is of course nonsense.
Still, we had to admit that his observations were correct.
But the fact that every scientist attacked him afterward and asked for studies to prove his point, was somewhat ironic.
Nobody asked for studies to prove that people in certain at-risk groups were dying.
When the first statistics from China and later worldwide data showed the same trend, that is to say, that almost no children under ten years old got sick, everyone should have made the argument that children clearly have to be immune.
For every other disease that doesn't afflict a certain group of people, we would come to the conclusion that that group is immune.
When people are sadly dying in a retirement home, but in the same place other pensioners with the same risk factors are left entirely unharmed, we should also conclude that they were presumably immune.
But this common-sense seems to have eluded many, let's call them "immunity deniers" just for fun.
This new breed of deniers had to observe that the majority of people who tested positive for this virus, i.e. the virus was present in their throats, did not get sick.
The term "silent carriers" was conjured out of a hat and it was claimed that one could be sick without having symptoms. Wouldn't that be something!
If this principle from now on gets naturalised into the realm of medicine, health insurers would really have a problem, but also teachers whose students could now claim to have whatever disease to skip school, if at the end of the day one didn't need symptoms anymore to be sick.
The next joke that some virologists shared was,
the claim that those who were sick without symptoms could still spread the virus to other people.
The "healthy" sick would have so much of the virus in their throats that a normal conversation between two people would be enough for the "healthy one" to infect the other healthy one.
At this point we have to dissect what is happening here:
If a virus is growing anywhere in the body, also in the throat, it means that human cells decease.
When [human] cells decease, the immune system is alerted immediately and an infection is caused.
One of the five cardinal symptoms of infection is pain.
It is understandable that those afflicted by Covid-19 might not remember that initial scratchy throat and then go on to claim that they didn't have any symptoms just a few days ago.
But for doctors and virologists to twist this into a story of "healthy" sick people, which stokes panic and was often given as a reason for stricter lockdown measures, just shows how bad the joke really is.
At least the WHO didn't accept the claim of asymptomatic infections and even challenges this claim on its website.
Here a succinct and brief summary, especially for the immunity deniers, of how humans are attacked by germs and how we react to them:
If there are pathogenic viruses in our environment, then all humans - whether immune or not - are attacked by this virus.
If someone is immune, the battle with the virus begins.
First we try to prevent the virus from binding to our own cells with the help of antibodies. This normally works only partially, not all are blocked and some viruses will attach to the appropriate cells.
That doesn't need to lead to symptoms, but it's also not a disease. Because the second guard of the immune system is now called into action.
That's the above mentioned T-cells, white blood cells, which can determine from the outside in which other cells the virus is now hiding to multiply.
These cells, which are now incubating the virus, are searched throughout the entire body and killed by the T-cells until the last virus is dead.
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome.
The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left.
Correct:
Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
That's exactly what happened, when there was the global news, even shared by the WHO, that 200 Koreans who already went through Covid-19 were infected a second time and that there was therefore probably no immunity against this virus.
The explanation of what really happened and an apology came only later, when it was clear that the immune Koreans were perfectly healthy and only had a short battle with the virus. The crux was that the virus debris registered with the overly sensitive test and therefore came back as "positive".
It is likely that a large number of the daily reported infection numbers are purely due to viral debris.
The PCR test with its extreme sensitivity was initially perfect to find out where the virus could be. But this test can not identify whether the virus is still alive, i.e. still infectious.
Unfortunately, this also led some virologists to equate the strength of a test result with viral load, i.e. the amount of virus someone can breathe out. Luckily, our day care centers stayed open nonetheless.
Since German virologist missed that part, because, out of principle, they do not look at what other countries are doing, even if other countries' case numbers are falling more rapidly.
5. The problem with corona immunity
What does this all mean in real life?
The extremely long incubation time of two to 14 days - and reports of 22 to 27 days - should wake up any immunologist. As well as the claim that most patients would no longer secrete the virus after five days.
Both [claims] in turn actually lead to the conclusion that there is - sort of in the background - a base immunity that contorts the events, compared to an expected cycle [of a viral infection] - i.e. leads to a long incubation period and quick immunity.
This immunity also seems to be the problem for patients with a severe course of the disease.
Our antibody titre, i.e. the accuracy of our defence system, is reduced the older we get.
But also people with a bad diet or who are malnourished may have a weakened immune system, which is why this virus does not only reveal the medical problems of a country, but also social issues.
If an infected person does not have enough antibodies, i.e. a weak immune response, the virus slowly spreads out across the entire body.
Now that there are not enough antibodies, there is only the second, supporting leg of our immune response left:
The T-cells begin to attack the virus-infested cells all over the body.
This can lead to an exaggerated immune response, basically to a massive slaughter:
this is called a Cytokine Storm.
Very rarely this can also happen in small children, in that case called Kawasaki Syndrome.
This very rare occurrence in children was also used in our country to stoke panic. It's interesting, however, that this syndrome is very easily cured.
The [affected] children get antibodies from healthy blood donors, i.e. people who went through coronavirus colds...
This means that the hushed-up [supposedly non-existent] immunity in the population is in fact used therapeutically.
What now?
The virus is gone for now.
It will probably come back in winter, but it won't be a second wave, but just a cold.
Those young and healthy people who currently walk around with a mask on their faces would be better off wearing a helmet instead, because the risk of something falling on their head is greater than that of getting a serious case of Covid-19.
If we observe a significant rise in infections in 14 days [after the Swiss relaxed the lockdown], we'd at least know that one of the measures was useful.
Other than that I recommend reading John P.A. Ioannidis' latest work in which he describes the global situation based on data on May 1st 2020:
People below 65 years old make up only 0.6 to 2.6 % of all fatal Covid cases.
To get on top of the pandemic, we need a strategy merely concentrating on the protection of at-risk people over 65. If that's the opinion of a top expert, a second lockdown is simply a no-go.
On our way back to normal, it would be good for us citizens if a few scaremongers apologized.
Such as doctors who wanted a triage of over 80 year old Covid patients in order to stop ventilating them.
Also media that kept showing alarmist videos of Italian hospitals to illustrate a situation that as such didn't exist.
All politicians call for "testing, testing, testing" without even knowing what the test actually measures.
And the federal government for an app they'll never get to work and will warn me if someone near me is positive, even if they're not infectious.
In winter, when the flu and other colds make the rounds again, we can then go back to kissing each other a little less, and we should wash our hands even without a virus present.
And people who'll get sick nonetheless can then don their masks to show others what they have learned from this pandemic.
And if we still haven't learned to protect our at-risk groups, we'll have to wait for a 'vaccine' that will hopefully also be effective in at-risk people.
Excess Deaths in 2021 Point to Depopulation Agenda
Question– Why is mortality in Scotland higher in 2021 than 2020?
Answer– Because more people are dying. And the reason more people are dying is that more people have been vaccinated. In other words, there’s a link between rising mortality and the Covid-19 vaccine.
Question– You can’t prove that.
Answer– You’re right, I can’t. The evidence is all circumstantial. But it is compelling, all the same. For example, rising mortality isn’t just happening in Scotland. It’s happening in many of the countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. They’re all seeing a significant uptick in all-cause mortality. Why is that? What are they doing differently in 2021 than they did in the years before?
Question– I can see what you’re getting at, but I still don’t think you have enough evidence to make your case.
Answer– Okay, then you tell me: Why are more people dying in 2021 than 2020? And, keep in mind, all-cause mortality isn’t just up a bit; it’s smashing the five-year average. Check out this recent post from Alex Berenson at Substack:
Scotland is 87% adult vaccinated; weekly deaths are now 30% above normal
Oct 14, This is from the Public Health Scotland’s Covid-19 Daily Dashboard:
“The 315 excess deaths logged last week represents a 30% increase on the five-year pre-pandemic average for this time of year. This marks the 20th consecutive week with excess deaths above the five-year average and the highest since the week ending January 10, 2021.”
Even excluding Covid deaths they were almost 20% above normal for the most recent week, and the trend is rising.” (“Scotland is 87% adult vaccinated; weekly deaths are now 30% above normal”, Alex Berenson Substack)
Oct 14, This is from the Public Health Scotland’s Covid-19 Daily Dashboard:
“The 315 excess deaths logged last week represents a 30% increase on the five-year pre-pandemic average for this time of year. This marks the 20th consecutive week with excess deaths above the five-year average and the highest since the week ending January 10, 2021.”
Even excluding Covid deaths they were almost 20% above normal for the most recent week, and the trend is rising.” (“Scotland is 87% adult vaccinated; weekly deaths are now 30% above normal”, Alex Berenson Substack)
Question– But how can you build a case on data from just one country? It’s ridiculous.
Answer– But it’s not just Scotland. The same rule applies to many of the countries that launched vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. Here’s more from Berenson:
Add Germany – Europe’s most populous nation – to the countries seeing unusually high all-cause mortality that is NOT Covid-related.
In September, Germany reported almost 78,000 deaths, more than 10 percent higher than the expected figure, German government demographers said earlier this week.
Press: “Mortality figures (in Germany) in September, 2021: 10% above the median of previous years.” (“It’s not just the UK; all-cause deaths are also now running well above normal in Germany (80% adults fully vaccinated)”, Alex Berenson Substack)
And then there’s this is from Data Analyst’s Twitter account (check out the charts):
Data Analysis @Data_is_Louder
·
Oct 26
COVID mystery Denmark, Finland and Norway excess deaths are higher than in their worst Covid outbreak. These mysterious excess deaths happened in time conjunction with vaccination rollout.
Denmark ––“5 months is a row 2021 has broken the 10-year record of people dying from all causes…..Covid-19 deaths close to zero during the same period.”
The same is true in Ireland, UK and Israel. Take a look at England (Ages 10 to 59 years old.)
What’s so disturbing about this chart is that it shows how the vaccines target the young. “While the COVID death toll has been largely confined to the elderly… it’s the young who are bearing the brunt of vaccine injury. According to VigiAccess, the adverse event database for the World Health Organization, 41% of the more than 2.4 million vaccine injuries reported so far are among those under age 44, and just six percent are among people over age 75.” (“The real pandemic has just begun, and it’s COVID shot-induced heart attacks in the young”, Lifesite News)
That’s something you’re not going to read in the media, and for good reason, too. Because it would undermine their lethal objective to continue hyping the vaccine.
Here’s more from quantitative analyst Joel Smalley:
Weekly deaths update from the CDC. “Despite” being over 80% fully vaccinated, since 24-July, over 65s deaths in Florida are 14% higher than same period last year. “Despite” at least 50% full vaccination in the under 65s, deaths are up 46% and will rise as reporting catches up.
The examples are everywhere across the Internet. You don’t have to look very far. Wherever mass vaccinations took place, there, too, morality has risen. And–once again–these are not Covid deaths. These are mainly heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, circulatory diseases and neurological issues; the same vaccine-induced ailments we were warned about by the physicians and scientists who’ve been telling us the truth from the start. Turns out they were right after all.
Simply put, the vaccines are increasing fatalities, not reducing them. They are making matters worse not better. They are perpetuating the crisis not ending it.
And that is why the red line in the chart is pointing upward. It’s an indication that the death toll will continue to rise as long as we continue to do what we are doing now, inoculating millions of people with a cytotoxic pathogen that triggers blood clots, inflammation and autoimmunity. Here’s another chart of Scotland with a short comment from The Daily Skeptic:
“…. the presence of a Covid epidemic was not seen in summer 2020, but is seen in summer 2021. What differs between the two years? The glaringly obvious answer is the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination. There was no COVID-19 vaccination programme in 2020, but there was rollout of Covid vaccinations in a sequential way to increasingly younger age groups in 2021, a pattern that we see in the manifestation of excess deaths. …. The Yellow Card adverse events reporting system,…. has already recorded over 1,700 deaths in the U.K. population associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. There is therefore a prima facie case for COVID-19 vaccination being a contributing factor to the dramatic rise in summer excess deaths in Scotland in 2021.”
(“Are Vaccines Driving Excess Deaths in Scotland, a Professor of Biology Asks”, The Daily Skeptic)
Have you noticed how the media is trying to cover-up the sudden surge in mortality?
Here’s a good example from an article at the UK Telegraph:
“While focus remains firmly fixed on Covid-19, a second health crisis is quietly emerging in Britain. Since the beginning of July, there have been thousands of excess deaths that were not caused by coronavirus. According to health experts, this is highly unusual for the summer. Although excess deaths are expected during the winter months, when cold weather and seasonal infections combine to place pressure on the NHS, summer generally sees a lull.
This year is a worrying outlier.
According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), since July 2 there have been 9,619 excess deaths in England and Wales, of which 48 per cent (4,635) were not caused by Covid-19.
So if all these extra people are not dying from coronavirus, what is killing them?
Data from Public Health England (PHE) shows that during that period there were 2,103 extra death registrations with ischemic heart disease, 1,552 with heart failure, as well as an extra 760 deaths with cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and aneurysm and 3,915 with other circulatory diseases.” (“Thousands more people than usual are dying … but it’s not from Covid“, Telegraph)
So, according to the article, there were:
- 24% more heart failure deaths than baseline
- 19% ischaemic heart disease
- 16% cerebrovascular disease (strokes)
- 18% other circulatory diseases
All of these cerebrovascular, cardiac and circulatory ailments didn’t suddenly drop from the sky in 2021. They are vaccine-generated injuries. Can you see that?
And they are all linked to the spike protein, which is the “biological mechanism of action” that “damages blood vessels, organs, and causes blood clots, and that can kill a human being?” (Quote: Dr Peter McCullough)
Have you wondered why more people died this year of Covid than in all of 2020?
According to Johns Hopkins, Covid killed 353, 000 people in the United States in 2020. But in just 10 months in 2021, 390,000 people have died. How can that be? After all:
(Note: To read this full article click on this link: Excess Deaths in 2021 Point to Depopulation Agenda)
