"The Good The Bad and The Ugly Internet Information". The Information I research online also has this theme behind it and like the movie; I'm after the Gold of truth at the end. I also do Internet Online Research as a job. I syndicate UFO, Secret Societies, and Ancient Human History conspiracy theories as a hobby. I want everybody who came by this Blog to be enlightened on the world we live in and to come away with just a little bit more knowledge. Thanks for coming by.
Darkbird18
3 Ancient Civilizations That Make Historians Uncomfortable
The accepted consensus among historians is that the cradle of civilization, or the beginning of large organized cities, began with Mesopotamia around 6,500 B.C. and didn't really gain momentum until around 5,000 B.C., when agricultural cities began to pop up all over the fertile crescent. The traditional theory is that before this agricultural and population boom there were only relatively small proto-cities, or large villages and towns in the neolithic period, lacking the trade, writing, and somewhat educated populations of the later and larger cities located in the fertile crescent. Recently, with the aid of modern technologies, we are finding evidence of ancient civilizations that existed directly after the last ice age, around 12,000 years ago. Many of these cities, or evidence of cities by large stone monuments and buildings, were submerged after the glaciers of the last ice age melted and the sea levels rose. This could push back their development to beginning before the last ice age and rewrite history timelines as we know them. Most archaeologists are reluctant to say definitively the age of these civilizations or even recognize that many of them aren't natural formations, like the Bimini Road submerged off the coast of Florida. They do this mostly because carbon dating is easily disputed and because more established scholars are sticking by their outdated research. There is a stigma associated with this kind of research, as scholars are often disgraced for putting their names behind studies that confirm these older dates. These cities may be a mystery until more dependable forms of dating technologies are invented, but evidence of their great age and sophistication is already outstanding and has been causing a large stir in the archaeological community.
100 Most Amazing Ancient Technologies Scientists Still Can't Explain
#3 Gobekli Tepe
Gobekli Tepe was a large city located at the top of a mountain ridge in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey, and includes massive stone religious monuments and temples created by people who supposedly had not yet developed metal tools or even pottery.
Found under 35 feet of sand and alongside 2 mastodon bones, which would make the artifact at least 11,000 years old.
20,000 Year Old Spiral-Shaped Metal Objects Found in Russia
These artifacts validity is often seriously questioned, but that is the point, to question historians and their definitive answers and that is what the existence of Gobekli Tepe does. But unlike the artifacts shown above, Gobekli Tepe's existence is not questioned.
Gobekli Tepe is separated into four layers ranging from the beginning of its construction until it disappeared, the oldest dating back to 12,000 years! The structures predate pottery, metallurgy, the invention of writing, and the invention of the wheel. They were even built before animal husbandry or the neolithic revolution, which occurred at around 9,000 B.C.
Archaeologists estimate that its construction would have required at least 500 round-the-clock workers to extract the 20 ton pillars from the local quarry, and carry them the half-mile to the site. Radiocarbon dating as well as comparative analysis indicate Gobekli Tepe is the oldest city known anywhere, and that at one time this epicenter attracted worshipers from up to a 100 miles away. Butchered bones found in large quantities were discovered at the site and identified as refuse from food that was hunted and prepared for it's congregants. Some believe that the carved pillars and idols representing various animals are there to protect the dead, and that Gobleki Tepe was an original cult city for the dead.
Around the beginning of the 8th century B.C. and the advent of agriculture and domestication of animals, the site lost it's importance and was abandoned. But not before its inhabitants carefully filled it in with rock and gravel, possibly to preserve it for their return.
The Advanced Pre Ice Age Civilizations that Vanished From Earth [FULL VIDEO]
The assumption is that the site was strictly a religious cult in practice and purpose and therefore uninhabited, which has been challenged with the suggestion that some of the structures served as large communal houses similar in some ways to the large plank houses of the Northwest Coast of North America with their impressive house posts and totem poles. It is not known why every few decades the existing pillars were buried to be replaced by new stones, as part of a smaller concentric ring inside an older one.
Gobekli Tepe has so far, raised more questions than answers, but it opens the door to a far older history of civilization than we ever imagined.
those who may be confused by the controversies surrounding the "New World Order", a One-World-Government, and American concern over giving the UN more power
those unaware of the issues involved
those wishing more background,
...I offer the following.
Originally presented for an Honors Class, "Dilemmas of War and Peace," at New Mexico State University, the paper was ridiculed and characterized by Dr. Yosef Lapid, (an acknowledged and locally quoted "expert" on Terrorism and Middle Eastern affairs) as,
"paranoid... possibly a symptom of mental illness."
You may judge for yourself.
Citing source data is the "scientific method," but does not seem to apply to "Conspiracy Theories." A thousand sources may be quoted, yet will not convince the "skeptics," the "realists."
It seems to me the "symptoms of mental illness" are on their side, if they refuse to look at evidence ("There are none so blind as those who WILL not see"); or perhaps something more sinister is at work, such as a knowledge of the truth, that does not want YOU to know.
To be paranoid means to believe in delusions of danger and persecution. If the danger is real, and the evidence credible, then it cannot be delusional. To ignore the evidence, and hope that it CANNOT be true, is more an evidence of mental illness.
The issue involves much more than a difference of philosophy, or political viewpoint. Growing up in the midst of the "Cold War," our generation were taught that those who attempted to abolish our national sovereignty and overthrow our Constitutional government were committing acts of treason. Please judge for yourself if the group discussed is guilty of such.
If one group is effectively in control of national governments and multinational corporations; promotes world government through control of media, foundation grants, and education; and controls and guides the issues of the day; then they control most options available.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the financial powers behind it, have done all these things, and promote the "New World Order", as they have for over seventy years.
The CFR is the promotional arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States of America. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members, and it uses its influence to infiltrate the New World Order into American life. Its' "experts" write scholarly pieces to be used in decision making, the academics expound on the wisdom of a united world, and the media members disseminate the message.
To understand how the most influential people in America came to be members of an organization working purposefully for the overthrow of the Constitution and American sovereignty, we have to go back at least to the early 1900's, though the story begins much earlier (depending on your viewpoint and beliefs).
That a ruling power elite does indeed control the U.S. government behind the scenes has been attested to by many Americans in a position to know.
Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962), said:
"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes."
In a letter to an associate dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote,
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
February 23, 1954, Senator William Jenner warned in a speech:
"Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded."
"Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws."
All that is needed to effectively control a government is to have control over the nation's money: a central bank with a monopoly over the supply of money and credit. This had been done in Western Europe, with the creation of privately owned central banks such as the Bank of England.
Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor while at Georgetown) wrote about the goals of the investment bankers who control central banks:
"... nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole... controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences."
The Bank of the United States (1816-36), an early attempt at an American central bank, was abolished by President Andrew Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation.
He wrote:
"The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced... are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it."
Thomas Jefferson wrote:
"The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution... if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Does that not describe the situation in America today?
The U.S. managed to do without a central bank until early in this century, when, according to Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr.,
"The Money Trust caused the 1907 panic, and thereby forced Congress to create a National Monetary Commission."
Headed by Senator Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., the Commission recommended creation of a central bank.
Though unconstitutional, as only "The Congress shall have Power... To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof... " (Article I, Section 8, U.S. Constitution) the Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913; ostensibly to stabilize the economy and prevent further panics, but as Lindberg warned Congress:
"This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth... the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized."
The Great Depression and numerous recessions later, it is obvious the Federal Reserve produces inflation and federal debt whenever it desires, but not stability.
Congressman Louis McFadden, House Committee on Banking and Currency Chairman (1920-31), stated:
"When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and industrialists... acting together to enslave the world...
Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is - the Fed has usurped the government."
Although called "Federal," the Federal Reserve system is privately owned by member banks, makes its own policies, and is not subject to oversight by Congress or the President.
As the overseer and supplier of reserves, the Fed gave banks access to public funds, which enhanced their lending capacity.
Peter Kershaw, in "Economic Solutions" lists the ten major shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank System as:
Rothschild: London and Berlin
Lazard Bros: Paris
Israel Seiff: Italy
Kuhn- Loeb Company: Germany
Warburg: Hamburg and Amsterdam
Lehman Bros: New York
Goldman and Sachs: New York
Rockefeller: New York
(That most, if not all of these families just happen to be Jewish, you may judge the significance of yourself).
The balance of stock is owned by major commercial member banks.
According to Devvy Kidd, "Why A Bankrupt America?" The Federal Reserve pays the Bureau of Engraving & Printing approximately $23 for each 1,000 notes printed. 10,000 $100 notes (one million dollars) would thus cost the Federal Reserve $230.
They then secure a pledge of collateral equal to the face value from the U.S. government. The collateral is our land, labor, and assets... collected by their agents, the IRS.
By authorizing the Fed to regulate and create money (and thus inflation), Congress gave private banks power to create profits at will.
As Lindberg put it:
"The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation... they can unload the stocks on the people at high prices during the excitement and then bring on a panic and buy them back at low prices... the day of reckoning is only a few years removed."
That day came in 1929, with the Stock Market crash and Great Depression.
One of the most important powers given to the Fed was the right to buy and sell government securities, and provide loans to member banks so they might also purchase them. This provided another built-in mechanism for profit to the banks, if government debt was increased. All that was needed was a method to pay off the debt.
This was accomplished through the passage of the income tax in 1913.
A national income tax was declared unconstitutional in 1895 by the Supreme Court, so a constitutional amendment was proposed in Congress by none other than... Senator Nelson Aldrich.
As presented to the American people it seemed reasonable enough: income tax on only one percent of income under $20,000, with the assurance that it would never increase.
Since it was graduated, the tax would "soak the rich", ... but the rich had other plans, already devising a method of protecting wealth.
As described by Gary Allen in his 1976 book "The Rockefeller File,"
"By the time the (16th) Amendment had been approved by the states, the Rockefeller Foundation was in full operation... about the same time that Judge Kenesaw Landis was ordering the breakup of the Standard Oil monopoly...
John D... not only avoided taxes by creating four great tax-exempt foundations; he used them as repositories for his 'divested' interests... made his assets non-taxable so that they might be passed down through generations without... estate and gift taxes...
Each year the Rockefellers can dump up to half their incomes into their pet foundations and deduct the "donations" from their income tax."
Exchanging ownership for control of wealth, foundations are also a handy means for promoting interests that benefit the wealthy.
Millions of foundation dollars have been "donated" to causes such as promoting the use of drugs, while degrading preventive medicine. Since many drugs are made from coal tar derivatives, both oil companies and drug manufacturing concerns (many Rockefeller owned or controlled) are the main beneficiaries.
With the means to loan enormous sums to the government (the Federal Reserve), a method to repay the debt (income tax), and an escape from taxation for the wealthy, (foundations), all that remained was an excuse to borrow money. By some happy "coincidence," in 1914 World War I began, and after American participation national debt rose from $1 billion to $25 billion.
Woodrow Wilson was elected President in 1913, beating incumbent William Howard Taft, who had vowed to veto legislation establishing a central bank. To divide the Republican vote and elect the relatively unknown Wilson, J.P. Morgan and Co. poured money into the candidacy of Teddy Roosevelt and his Progressive Party.
According to an eyewitness, Wilson was brought to Democratic Party headquarters in 1912 by Bernard Baruch, a wealthy banker.
He received an "indoctrination course" from those he met, and in return agreed, if elected:
to support the projected Federal Reserve and the income tax
"listen" to advice in case of war in Europe and on the composition of his cabinet
Wilson's top advisor during his two terms was a man named Colonel Edward M. House. House's biographer, Charles Seymour, called him the "unseen guardian angel" of the Federal Reserve Act, helping to guide it through Congress.
Another biographer wrote that House believed:
"...the Constitution, product of eighteenth-century minds... was thoroughly outdated; that the country would be better off if the Constitution could be scrapped and rewritten... "
House wrote a book entitled "Philip Dru: Administrator," published anonymously in 1912. The hero, Philip Dru, rules America and introduces radical changes, such as a graduated income tax, a central bank, and a "league of nations."
World War I produced both a large national debt, and huge profits for those who had backed Wilson.
Baruch was appointed head of the War Industries Board, where he exercised dictatorial power over the national economy. He and the Rockefellers were reported to have earned over $200 million during the war. Wilson backer Cleveland Dodge sold munitions to the allies, while J.P. Morgan loaned them hundreds of millions, with the protection of U.S. entry into the war.
It has come to our attention that some people are casting Aspersions on the veracity of our site. This because when they come upon pictures of ancient Black Egyptians, Europeans, Middle Easterners etc. they say "those are NOT Black people, Black people do NOT look like that". In a "Normal" world, that would be an extremely inane proposition. After all, the Black Man is the original Human, and from where all other Humans descend. And though duly noted in science, simple observation would indicate that the Black Man is the Earths most diverse creature. He possesses all of the known types and colors of Hair, Eyes, Noses, Mouths, Bodies, and even skin colors. But alas, in the White mans racist world that we all live in, the proposition is instead, very understandable. They have come expecting to see pictures of: (that which the White Man has Defined as the "True" Negro); and there are few to be found. To explain this seeming contradiction, we must first begin with a little history.
When the Prophet Muhammad allowed Whites, mostly Greeks, who had migrated south as a result of Alexander's victory over the Persians; then Romans, together with the latest migrants, the Turks from Asia, to join his army of conquest. He unknowingly was finalizing a process that began about 2,000 years earlier; when the first Whites from central Asia first entered southern Europe. First Greece fell to them, then Italy, then France and Spain, until finally, all of Europe was theirs.
DISCLAIMER: Please note, as the authentic "Real" artifacts plainly tell us, the ancient Greek and Roman societies were Black, Albino, and Mulatto - in other words - mixed race. As a matter of fact, Alexander the greats people, the Macedonians, are usually depicted in authentic artifacts as Mulattoes. And as we know, there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of Busts of Alexander as A white man. All of which are Albino Fakes, for the simple reason that the only authentic surviving image of Alexander, is the nondescript image of him in full armor on the Silver Decadrachm coin. As Persian artifacts clearly show us, the Central Asian Albino tribes like the Parthian's, Arian's, Bactrian's, and Scythian's, fought with the Black Persians against the Arab armies. For the sake of simplicity we here talk about Greeks and Romans as Albino entities exclusively, that is of course not accurate, as the Busts of Greeks and Romans as Whites are also not accurate. The world is flush with FAKE artifacts created by the Albino people showing themselves in historical roles, but very few artifacts of the actual People (Blacks) have survived Albino control. So we must make do with what we have available.
Later, Alexander's conquest of the Persian Empire gave Whites dominance over all that Persia had acquired, namely Egypt and Western Asia. The resurgent Sassanian Persians had later managed to take most of it back (except Egypt and the western Levant, which stayed in Greek, then Roman hands). But now Muhammad was determined to conquer all of it.
Which he did, but at the price of dooming all of the Black civilizations which still existed. Because as in Europe, Whites were not content with just being a part of the "New Order" they wanted to control and dominate it! Because of the meager population of Arabia, and also because of the Arab tribesman's resistance to his new religion, (he would later offer them the choice of conversion or Death!); Muhammad had no choice but to include Whites in his army. First the Greeks, then when the Romans quit the Western Levant in 639-640 A.D. (at Muhammads invitation), the Romans who remained behind, had no choice but to join him too. But the Caliphs still needed more men; therefore Turkish men were imported from Central Asia as Slave soldiers for the Caliphs army, and Turkish women were imported as Slaves for the Caliphs Harem (a practice that the Berbers (Moors) continued.
Click here for a short, but interesting, History of Slavery:Click >>>
With these Whites as the backbone of his army, Muhammads Islamic army was able to conquer parts of Eastern Europe, all of Western Asia, North Africa and Spain. But the fatal error by Blacks, came under Umayyad Caliph Umar II (reigned 717-720), it was by his decree that the now discontented "Mawali" Troops (Whites and non-Arab Muslims) were placed on the same footing with Arab Muslims, without respect to color or nationality. This decree allowed Greeks, Turks, Romans, and all other Eurasians to fully assimilate into the Muslim brotherhood.
At first it was the old-line Greeks and Romans who held sway. But as Turks kept coming in (first as Slave Soldiers), and as their population kept increasing, there could be no doubt as to who would triumph in the end.
The Turks first big break came in 868 A.D. It was during the rule of Abbasid Caliph Harun ar-Rashid (ruled 786-809), that the Caliphs began assigning Egypt to Turks rather than to Arabs. The first Turkish dynasty of Egypt was The Tulunid dynasty of Ibn Tulun, who entered Egypt in 868 A.D.
In Persia and Mesopotamia (which imported the first Turkish Slave Soldiers), the end came when Toghril Beg, the Turkish "Seljuq" Sultan, entered Baghdad in 1055 A.D, at which point, Buyid power was terminated, thus ending what Vladimir Minorsky, the great Persiaologist, called the “Persian intermezzo.”
In Anatolia, now called Turkey: In 1071 A.D. the Seljuq sultan Alp-Arslan defeated the Byzantine Empire at the Battle of Manzikert and thereby opened the way for several million Oguz tribesmen to settle in Anatolia. These Turks came to form the bulk of the population there, and one Oguz tribal chief, "Osman" founded the Ottoman dynasty (early 14th century): This dynasty would subsequently extend Turkish power throughout the eastern Mediterranean. The Oguz are the primary ancestors of the Turks of present-day Turkey.
In Egypt 1250 A.D. The Turkish Mamluk Slave Troops rebelled, and established their own dynasty in Egypt, independent of the Caliphs.
New History of Humanity - Astounding Scientific Discoveries
The White and "Mixed-race" people of the Middle East and North Africa, invariably identify themselves as Berber, Arab, or Persian - which of course, they are not, they are mainly Turkish. How refreshing then, to find a Middle Eastern organization that is comfortable acknowledging their true Turkish identity. Please visit the "Iran Chamber Society's" site page on the "Islamic Conquest". You will find that it is about the same as that contained in our own Persian history in the Elam section. Click here for the Iran Chamber Society site
On a wishful note: It would certainly be nice if the Chinese Government would also update their website history on the beginnings of Chinese civilization. As it stands now, if you don't already know Chinese history, you certainly won't learn it from their website. Their presentation is "mealy mouthed" confusing, and refuses to acknowledge the obvious influences of Blacks and Whites in China's beginnings. Luckily there are skeletons, Mummies, and scientific studies which do.
In Muhammads own homeland of Arabia, the end came late, but it came: In Arabia, the domination of Mecca and Medina by the resurgent Black Wahhabi Muslims, was a serious embarrassment to the Turkish Ottoman sultan - who was the titular overlord of the Arabian territory, and the leading Muslim sovereign. Therefore, at the invitation of Turkish Sultan Mahmud II (1808-39), Muhammad Ali Pasha (an Albanian Turk); sent an expedition to Arabia that between 1811 and 1813 expelled the Wahhabis from the Hejaz. In a further campaign (1816-18), Ibrahim Pasha, the viceroy's eldest son, defeated the Wahhabis in their homeland of Najd, and thus brought Central Arabia under Turkish Albanian control. With the taking of Arabia, Whites now had control over all of it - the territories and the Religions. And after each victory, they sought to insure that the Black man would never raise again in his former territories.
The White man found that to accomplish this, there was a weapon just as effective as the Sword or Gun - the Lie! With the lie, the White man was able to convince everyone that his own weakness, the Pale Albino like skin that he wore, was a strength and denoted superiority. Thus no meaning was to be given to the fact that unlike the Normal and Natural inhabitants of those lands, the White Man found it necessary to completely cover his body in clothing, from head to toe, in order to survive the Sunlight of those regions. There is no known record of what he told Blacks to convince them to wear the Total Body Robes that they now wear, but we know that it is not natural for them, as Black skin is natures natural protection against Sunburn and skin cancer, and because the Blacks of those regions wore light attractive clothing before the White mans conquest. The Black mans only consolation in all of this, is that even as he endures through hardship in those regions that were formerly his; Few "Pure Whites" still exist in the southern regions. They have been "Absorbed" and replaced by a "Mixed Race" people; who themselves have turned against the White Man. (The mainly "mixed-race" people of Turkey - keep petitioning to join the White European Community. But that has so-far not been forthcoming - the claim is that they are too "Different").
The Power of the Lie
The ancient Persians understood the power of the Lie: they were probably the first Middle Eastern Blacks to have day-to-day dealings with Whites; owing to the large numbers of Arian's immigrating across their Eastern borders. Perhaps it was these White people that Darius the Great (522-486 B.C.); had in mind when he inscribed the following on the south retaining wall of his palace at Persepolis.
Inscription:
3. (12-24.) Darius the King says: May Ahuramazda bear me aid, with the gods of the royal house; and may Ahuramazda protect this country from a (hostile) army, from famine, from the Lie! Upon this country may there not come an army, nor famine, nor the Lie; this I pray as a boon from Ahuramazda together with the gods of the royal house. This boon may Ahuramazda together with the gods of the royal house give to me!
In Darius the Great's "Behistun Inscription" the Lie is mentioned twenty one (21) times:
Inscription:
55. (4.36-40.). Darius the King says: You who shall be king hereafter, protect yourself vigorously from the Lie; the man who shall be a Lie-follower, him do you punish well, if thus you shall think, "May my country be secure!"
The Changing Face of Egyptian Rule
Egyptian
Greek
Roman
Turk
Modern
Somewhere along the way, the White man decided that it was not enough to proclaim himself superior, he must make Blacks "Inferior" (for reasons that will be explained). To this end, he instituted something that was not known to the world before, "Racism". No one knows exactly when it began, but it evolved into one of mans most vile creations. In the United States of America, it reached its zenith with the Dred Scott decision.
Dred Scott
In March 1857, the Supreme Court of the United States answered a question that Congress had evaded for decades: whether Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in the territories. The case originated in 1846, when a Missouri slave, Dred Scott, sued to gain his freedom. Scott argued that while he had been the slave of an army surgeon he had lived for four years in Illinois, a free state, and Wisconsin, a free territory, and that his residence on free soil had erased his slave status.
Dred Scott
Roger Brooke Taney
Chief Justice of the United States
Chief Justice Taney delivered the opinion of the Court....
In the opinion of the Court the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument....
They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic whenever a profit could be made by it. This opinion was at that time fixed and universal in the civilized portion of the white race....
No one, we presume, supposes that any change in public opinion or feeling, in relation to this unfortunate race, in the civilized nations of Europe or in this country should induce the Court to give to the words of the Constitution a more liberal construction in their favor than they were intended to bear when the instrument was framed and adopted....
And upon a full and careful consideration of the subject, the Court is of opinion that, upon the facts stated in the plea in abatement, Dred Scott was not a citizen of Missouri within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States and not entitled as such to sue in its courts.
The White man taught racism in his Schools and Universities; and since by now, he controlled most of the World and its media, everyone was taught racism!
The New Student's Reference Work (1914)
Negroes
Ne′groes, a name given to most of the races inhabiting Africa, though it does not include all the inhabitants. The inhabitants of northern Africa, as the Abyssinians or Nubians, and the Hottentots of the south do not belong to the negro race. The physical characteristics of the true negro are black skin, woolly hair, flat nose and thick lips. Their skin is soft, and in the infant is a dull red, becoming black very soon. The negroes of the Guinea coast, who are rude savages, have a deep-black color and ugly features. Other tribes of the interior are tall, well-formed and warlike, and have some ingenuity in making implements from iron. The skull is long and narrow, with low forehead, prominent jaws and retreating chin. As a rule they are of a low order of intelligence, mechanical in their work but capable of great endurance. They are of a less nervous disposition than whites, more frequently color-blind, have smaller lungs and larger livers. The negro has long been a prey to the slave-traffic, being captured in large numbers and sold as slaves in other countries. The first slaves were brought to the United States in 1619, and this traffic was not discontinued until 1794, when it was prohibited by act of congress. The Spaniards began the trade, and King James and Queen Elizabeth both issued patents to companies. Between 1794 and 1840 the trade was confined mostly from the African coast to the West Indies and Brazil. The coast of Guinea was the largest slave-market, but inasmuch as they sold none of their own people but relied on those captured in war or by strategem, most of the slaves sent to the United States were of the pure negro type of the interior; while most of those taken to Brazil and the West Indies were closely allied to the Kafir and Zulu stock of the eastern coast. The mortality among the negroes is greater than the whites, attributed in the south much to the fact of their low condition and inattention to the laws of health, in the north to their inability to withstand the cold and variable weather, as the diseases from which they suffer are mostly those of the respiratory organs. Therefore the publication, at frequent intervals, of accounts of long-lived negroes may be ascribed to the ignorance of their ages, and not to any exceptional tenacity of life. In disposition the negro, as a rule, is cheerful and peaceable, unconcerned for the future, inclined to live in colonies and of emotionally religious instincts. Common among them even to the present day is the exercise of a certain form of witchcraft, called voodooism, prosecuted by means of charms, philters and fetiches.
But not content with the lie of speech, the White man in the 19th. and 20th. centuries, created scientific lies to bolster his claim.
Samuel George Morton (1799-1851), one of the inspirers of physical anthropology, collected hundreds of human skulls from all over the world and started trying to find a way to classify them according to some logical criterion. Influenced by the common theories of his time, he claimed that he could judge the intellectual capacity of a race by the cranial capacity (the measure of the volume of the interior of the skull). A large skull meant a large brain and high intellectual capacity, and a small skull indicated a small brain and decreased intellectual capacity. By studying these skulls he decided at what point Caucasians stopped being Caucasians, and at what point Negroes began. Morton had many skulls from ancient Egypt, and concluded that the ancient Egyptians were not African, but were White.
Morton's big mistake here was evidence (there were just too many Egyptian statues hanging around, which clearly showed that Egyptians were of course Black people). Thus, this was too big a lie, even for the White man; so Morton and his theories quickly fell into disrepute. But an indication of just how pathetic some Whites are as regards to race - Some still believe that Egyptians were White people (You really really have to WANT to believe it, for that to make any sense at all).
Has anyone noticed the virulence of the words used above? Those were not words of description, or even words of criticism, they were words of hatred and Damnation! What could it be that compels the White man to use such hateful words against another Human being? More follows:
